Because there's still the chance a rock might slam into it one day.
If humanity is going to survive beyond a few million years or whatever, we probably need to be living on more than one planet. Our chances and longevity increase even more if we actually manage to live in more than one solar system.
Dude, we can't even manage to get the "leaders of the free world" to think 4 years ahead of the next ellection cycle, much less 1000 years. Imagine trying to win an ellection platafform built around "survivability of the human species" while your ellectorate dwelves in post-scarcity abundance. Snowball in hell chance.
I wouldn't be surprised if most intelligent alien civilizations are trapped inside a cycle of technological utopian apex => meteorite smash => rebuilding civilization from scratch. Hell, several human civilizations have had to start all over here on Earth due to short-sighteness. Technological and social progress is much less linear and inevitable than we would like to think.
Dude, we can't even manage to get the "leaders of the free world" to think 4 years ahead of the next ellection cycle, much less 1000 years. Imagine trying to win an ellection platafform built around "survivability of the human species" while your ellectorate dwelves in post-scarcity abundance. Snowball in hell chance.
I wouldn't be surprised if most intelligent alien civilizations are trapped inside a cycle of technological utopian apex => meteorite smash => rebuilding civilization from scratch. Hell, several human civilizations have had to start all over here on Earth due to short-sighteness. Technological and social progress is much less linear and inevitable than we would like to think.
We're slowly destroying the Earth, why would they want to land here?
Personally I think we have hit an evolutionary dead end and won't advance much further unless it's by complete chance. If there are aliens who have been watching they're likely to leave us alone and wait for the birth of new species after our extinction IMHO.
Because of the Fermi Paradox.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wait-but-why/the-fermi-paradox_b_5489415.html
The idea that there *must* more advanced life is really just a secular re-jig on one version of the idea of a supreme being. There's as much a chance that we're #1 as there is we're #33123 on the 'Most Advanced Civ' list.
Imagine one day we do find hard evidence of alien life. But rather than being super cool advanced aliens, they're super dumb neanderthal aliens that are tens of thousands of years behind us on the evolutionary arc.
That would be such a buzz kill.
The common fear is that a civilization that advanced would most likely be a conquering one.
Why does everyone talks as if the "Aliens" were all the same race/civilization?
if technological advanced species are relatively common, one should expect different motivations from them, enough that no prime directive or war or whatever would stop all of them.
this leads to the only real possible explanation, space faring civilization are rare to the point that we are effectively alone in the galaxy
We're slowly destroying the Earth, why would they want to land here?
"Prime Directive" is one of the theories postulated for the Fermi Paradox. Something similar is the "Earth as a zoo" theory. Basically, they're watching us and making sure no one impedes our natural development.
We're slowly destroying the Earth, why would they want to land here?
The idea that there *must* more advanced life is really just a secular re-jig on one version of the idea of a supreme being. There's as much a chance that we're #1 as there is we're #33123 on the 'Most Advanced Civ' list.
I would say there is less chance of us being #1 than there is of something else out there being #1. As I said before, we've not been here very long at all. Life developing on another planet just 500 years earlier could look like gods to us. Let alone at some point in the billions of years before that.
Imagine going back to the 1500s and what they'd think of the shiny things you'd take back (and not be able to use because no electricity)
What if the dinossaurs have never existed? Would the mammals had dominated the world much early, and so the Home Sapiens could also have arrived earlier?
What if the dinossaurs have never existed? Would the mammals had dominated the world much early, and so the Home Sapiens could also have arrived earlier?
We're slowly destroying the Earth, why would they want to land here?
I'm not sure about this. Civs with the wrong priorities like warmongering or conquest would far more likely destroy themselves first over internal conflicts before reaching interstellar tech level. To reach that kind of tech you'd need a very long period of worldwide political stability with a prime focus on scientific research and a high degree of cooperation.
They sure as hell don't wanna bother with the worst species on the planet.
I'm not sure about this. Civs with the wrong priorities like warmongering or conquest would far more likely destroy themselves first over internal conflicts before reaching interstellar tech level. To reach that kind of tech you'd need a very long period of worldwide political stability with a prime focus on scientific research and a high degree of cooperation.
What if we are the aliens and the original Human race are living underneath the earth and we're slowly killing them with global warming.
We're slowly destroying the Earth, why would they want to land here?
THIS.Earth will be fine. It's us that will be dead.
Earth has survived much worse than a few billion humans.
Come on, we can identify which bacterium lived in which dino's anus 200 million years ago. Don't you think if aliens already visited us, we wouldn't have found out?
Since as far as we know they have not been here just adds evidence that civilizations don't make it that far along, or they don't exist at all.
Yeah well, you wrote a lot but the amount of dismissal and mental gymnastics you have to perform to convince yourself that it was nothing far and away surpasses the typical amount of effort it takes to dismiss an occurrence. Books have been written about this incident. Our own military described it as "a classic which meets all the criteria necessary for a valid study of the UFO phenomenon". Your "big meteor shower." disabled then re-enabled an F4 Phantom's weapon systems, not its' nav, not its radar. Multiple primary radar rerturns. Transponder singnals. Meteor shower = swamp gas, in this case.I think it can....