This election we are seeing the two most disliked nominees in our history. While people seem to have a general understanding of why Trump is so disliked, it is commonly asked why so many people dislike Hillary Clinton.
Here are my reasons for why I do not like Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate (note, I find her to be an okay candidate on domestic issues, but when it comes to the role of commander and chief, her record on foreign policy and national security is is abysmal)
She supported regime change in Iraq, voting in favor of the Iraq war
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/107-2002/s237
She voted for the patriot act twice, and continues to defend unwarranted national surveillance
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/L...ote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00313
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/109-2006/s29
She voted to recognize Iran's revolutionary guard as a terrorist organization, effectively giving then president Bush the authority to expand the war on terror into that country
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.co...ote-on-iran-resolution-shows-flawed-judgment/
She supported regime change in Libya, which includes the killing of prominent tribal leaders, and the destabilization of that region
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/06/03/libya-is-obamas-biggest-regret-and-hillarys-biggest-threat/
As secretary of state she suggested the US give a "green light" for an Israeli air strike on Iran's nuclear facilities
http://swampland.time.com/2014/01/1...ed-u-s-approval-of-an-israeli-strike-on-iran/
As secretary of state she pushed for the failed troop surge in Afghanistan (VP Joe Biden opposed the surge), which lead to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th deadliest years of that war
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...en-versus-hillary-clinton-20150903-story.html
She condoned a military coup in Honduras that ousted an elected leader
http://www.democracynow.org/2016/4/13/hear_hillary_clinton_defend_her_role
When the UN voted on the mere recognition of Palestine's existence (not to become a UN member), she called the decision "unfortunate and counter productive" and then has the audacity to claim she's for a two state solution.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/polit...erproductive-un-palestinian-resolution-150685
She pushed for regime change in Syria (as if the blunders in Iraq and Libya are not enough) http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-17578802[
]http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/12/hillary-clintons-insane-plan-for-a-no-fly-zone.htm
and her desire to establish a no fly zone over Syria is a significant difference between her and the Obama administration. Obama is against the no fly zone, and people from within his administration have gave warning of the dangers of a no fly zone over Syria http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/18/politics/axelrod-axe-files-ben-rhodes-syria/ The purpose of a no fly zone is not to fight ISIS, because ISIS has no air force. To enforce a no fly zone, we're talking about shooting down Syrian and possibly Russian jets who refuse to comply. Hillary had this to say about the no fly zone
"To have a no-fly zone you have to take out all of the air defense, many of which are located in populated areas. So our missiles, even if they are standoff missiles so were not putting our pilots at riskyoure going to kill a lot of Syrians. So all of a sudden this intervention that people talk about so glibly becomes an American and NATO involvement where you take a lot of civilians
At virtually every given opportunity to make a decision on foreign policy and national security, Hillary has chosen the more aggressive rout. At best she is the lesser of two evils, but she is by no means a good candidate
Here are my reasons for why I do not like Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate (note, I find her to be an okay candidate on domestic issues, but when it comes to the role of commander and chief, her record on foreign policy and national security is is abysmal)
She supported regime change in Iraq, voting in favor of the Iraq war
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/107-2002/s237
She voted for the patriot act twice, and continues to defend unwarranted national surveillance
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/L...ote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00313
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/109-2006/s29
She voted to recognize Iran's revolutionary guard as a terrorist organization, effectively giving then president Bush the authority to expand the war on terror into that country
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.co...ote-on-iran-resolution-shows-flawed-judgment/
She supported regime change in Libya, which includes the killing of prominent tribal leaders, and the destabilization of that region
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/06/03/libya-is-obamas-biggest-regret-and-hillarys-biggest-threat/
As secretary of state she suggested the US give a "green light" for an Israeli air strike on Iran's nuclear facilities
http://swampland.time.com/2014/01/1...ed-u-s-approval-of-an-israeli-strike-on-iran/
As secretary of state she pushed for the failed troop surge in Afghanistan (VP Joe Biden opposed the surge), which lead to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th deadliest years of that war
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...en-versus-hillary-clinton-20150903-story.html
She condoned a military coup in Honduras that ousted an elected leader
http://www.democracynow.org/2016/4/13/hear_hillary_clinton_defend_her_role
When the UN voted on the mere recognition of Palestine's existence (not to become a UN member), she called the decision "unfortunate and counter productive" and then has the audacity to claim she's for a two state solution.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/polit...erproductive-un-palestinian-resolution-150685
She pushed for regime change in Syria (as if the blunders in Iraq and Libya are not enough) http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-17578802[
]http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/12/hillary-clintons-insane-plan-for-a-no-fly-zone.htm
and her desire to establish a no fly zone over Syria is a significant difference between her and the Obama administration. Obama is against the no fly zone, and people from within his administration have gave warning of the dangers of a no fly zone over Syria http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/18/politics/axelrod-axe-files-ben-rhodes-syria/ The purpose of a no fly zone is not to fight ISIS, because ISIS has no air force. To enforce a no fly zone, we're talking about shooting down Syrian and possibly Russian jets who refuse to comply. Hillary had this to say about the no fly zone
"To have a no-fly zone you have to take out all of the air defense, many of which are located in populated areas. So our missiles, even if they are standoff missiles so were not putting our pilots at riskyoure going to kill a lot of Syrians. So all of a sudden this intervention that people talk about so glibly becomes an American and NATO involvement where you take a lot of civilians
At virtually every given opportunity to make a decision on foreign policy and national security, Hillary has chosen the more aggressive rout. At best she is the lesser of two evils, but she is by no means a good candidate