Just for the sake of argument (LOL), people are not going to buy PS5s to open them and then take out that laser source, power it and aim it at their eyes.
Because I have news for you... old-school CD and DVD lasers are also harmful to human eyes. Thankfully, not only are optical disc readers properly sealed to prevent the laser from being emitted to the outside, people have also historically not been stupid enough to do what I described above... as far as I know.
Also of note, that "research" you pointed at fails to take note that not all blue-light LEDs are Blu-Rays. Blu-Ray laser actually is near ultraviolet (edge of the visible spectrum).
Another curiousity: HD-DVD and Blu-Ray both use near ultraviolet wavelength (with the higher data storage density of Blu-Ray discs owed to optics, with higher power lenses).
Take some time to sink that in, OP. By your own argument, HD-DVD could be just as lethal as Blu-Ray.
(Edited a technicality).
Hell, Dollar Store laser pointers are harmful to your eyes (and your poor cat's mental state), but only dumb shits point them at their eyes for periods of time.
Don't even get me started on the sun. We need an alternative to that stupid celestial fraud.Hell, Dollar Store laser pointers are harmful to your eyes (and your poor cat's mental state), but only dumb shits point them at their eyes for periods of time.
It is very simple to explain why your SSD's won't help and why the BR format will hinder many of the "revealed" PS4 features, as vindication is received:
https://www.quora.com/Why-are-Blu-ray-players-so-slow
This doesn't change if a bluray is "installed" on to an SSD. The checks still happen and because of that as shown, consumers are wondering why there is constant slowness with Bluray movies. When you install the game or movie to the SSD or even faster than BR HDD, the codecs and DRM are still there and they still run the check. But they do it the same way as if the disc was still in a Bluray player, so unlike modern digital files that check near instant the installed Bluray files will still move at Bluray place SSD or not. At the same slow speeds and nowhere near the instant speeds that modern open digital files have. As Bluray is proprietary.
buying media that supports a higher write speed presents no direct benefit, BR is a WORM (Write Once, Read Many) type media, write/read speeds of SSD drives should be much of a concern since you are only installing to a singular drive, and that single SSD does not have enough alone to FORCE a significant speed upgrade. At best, if you're lucky, you'll get a bit of a speed boost depending on the software on the disc, but it will be marginal.
Even on Neogaf.com you can see conversations of this:
This is because the Pro SSD is hindered by the same source Bluray cap as the regular PS4 that uses a SLOWER SSD. Yet both SSD drives are faster than BR, so why are things still slow for both? That's because the software of the Bluray is still in the files once you install them to the SSD. The cap is a real thing, at best you get a marginal loading boost, mostly for menu's, and in many cases you don't notice.
This guy says Sony but it's actually not Sony's fault, it's Blurays. Sony has to design the transfer speeds around the disc drive and the software that supports it, they couldn't make the cap higher because it would be pointless. You can't get around the Bluray cap. People keep thinking there's no Cap but there is a software cap and since the installed BR files are now digital since they are no longer attached to hardware there's no way to brute force speed increases. With physical you can brute force speed increases with 16x, 32x BR drives, but once it's digital that can't work, even with SSD.
So with this, it's also not the CPU or GPU's (obviously) fault. So the only thing left is literally the software in the Bluray. It's the only thing that can be blamed, there's no way around it. It's the only thing left that can cause an obstruction great enough to impact transfer speeds.
So the software as it's downloaded to the SSD, is still the same software in the Bluray disc, not a virtual drive like some people in the thread said because they are getting hardware and software mixed up. The software in the BR, is designed with the BR drive in mind and the common format rules of the BR corporation group. So that all BR players play BR's the same way across the board for every OEM, outside drive speeds, which are physical ways to brute force speed increases. You can't so it digitally.
But them we have to get into the health reasons as well why Bluray should be scrapped.
ANOTHER BIG REASON why Bluray needs to be kicked from the PS5, is because people ARE DYING. Bluray has been dangerous for years, but because money has pushed it artificially to the frontlines for years, it's been causing damage to peoples bodies, making them blind, giving them cancer and other illness related diseases, produced radiations, and other big problems:
https://www.gearbest.com/blog/how-to/the-harm-and-source-of-blu-ray-3224
Most people are ill-informed so don't realize the many things they use daily causing massive permanent harm to the. But the millions of people sick or deceased due to the dangers of Bluray as shown above is something that corporations should be forced to answer for. Especially Sony and Microsoft which have been pedaling the format into the electronic consumer gaming industry.
The damage is irreversible.
Nah, it's just fantasy.
Thats a shame. : [He’s disappeared and never made that room. :-(
Not intentionally, it seems.Is this satire?
Is this satire?
Once the truth comes out, you will regret your words and deeds.Lock thread, Ban OP.
Sony replaced him with a convincing facsimile after the real Cerny died in an unfortunate Blu-Ray laser accident. It's all a big cover-up.This is the lunacy of fanboyism... it's complete and utter lunacy.
BTW are we calling into question whether it was actually "Cerny" who was being interviewed? That's what I gathered from the use of the quotations around his name...
It's ridiculous, if someone's going out of their way to be struck by a bluray laser in the eye, they might as well eat the microchips and experience the internal damage.1) Yes Blu-Ray lasers are harmful. So were the lasers in portable CD players of the 90's. And every other disc-based console you can think of. This topic is about whether a SSD will make an improvement in a system with a Bluray drive; the question of how harmful they are is irrelevant, but if we're discussing it, decades have shown an acceptable utility vs risk scenario for optical drives. It's also utterly irrefutable that cars can kill people. Since I can't refute that, should we ban cars? A pencil can kill you, everything in existence comes with risks that must be weighed against utility and cost.
Freedom Gate Co. has done a great job steering this thread toward excellence.Ok, it's quite obvious that some of us have fallen for what is now confirmed to be an elaborate trolling attempt. I'm glad he's this adamant about keeping it going. I miss this kind of trolling on the internet.
Very fun thread. 10/10, avoid blu rays getting into your eyes.
Late April fools joke my friend, late April Fool.What the fuck did I just read?
This doesn't change if a bluray is "installed" on to an SSD.
I thought the whole point of NuGAF is that fun was allowed again. I mean this thread is fun. No one is taking it seriously. Just laugh at the OP along with the rest of us and enjoy yourself for a change.The fact that op hasn't been banned just goes to show you can post literally anything on this forum these days with no repercussions.
HVD is right around the corner don't worry (not really)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_Versatile_Disc
EDIT.
Oh, its the "blu ray is the devil" poster again
I was interested in this until I watched 10 mins, I couldn't listen to him anymore. Tim sounds like he is using a text to speech app or somethingOff-topic but Tim (Kotaku) has a great series on YouTube about the translation of FF VII. Recommend it if you are a fan of either Tim or FF VII
Try copy-pasting the content of the OP into a text-to-speech reader. Pick the most nasal voice you can find and play it back.I was interested in this until I watched 10 mins, I couldn't listen to him anymore. Tim sounds like he is using a text to speech app or something
Another person who can't man up and refute the article. I guess maybe one day a gaffer will come and do so, or maybe not ever, since's it's actually right, as admitted by watnau above.
Nintendo does not use SD chips.If Switch can do microSD cards, surely MS or Sony can too. By the time, PS5 and Xbox X2 come out, 64-128gb cards should be cheap.
Of course not as cheap as a BR disc. But if Nintendo can use SD chips, so can the others.
Why waste money on a SD card if you are going to install the game on the faster SSD anyways?If Switch can do microSD cards, surely MS or Sony can too. By the time, PS5 and Xbox X2 come out, 64-128gb cards should be cheap.
Of course not as cheap as a BR disc. But if Nintendo can use SD chips, so can the others.
Why waste money on a SD card if you are going to install the game on the faster SSD anyways?