ThoseDeafMutes said:REAL STICKS OR BUST.
Asus says <1 ms lag for a 1080p stream, which is almost imperceptible, far less than any online game you play on Live.KAL2006 said:interesting, but isn't that line of sight (no walls), also isn't that just streaming video content where lag does not matter at all, but with games it does.
I think it is a +5Mb connection, but bandwidth its one part of the problem. The other is latency. If you are some Kilometers away from an onlive server the experience is quiet acceptable but not balls out flawless yet. But i suscribe to the idea that if something like onlive is possible with a 720p compressed image no less, then i could see Nintendo sending a SD or SubSD feed localy withouth much issues.Completely forgot about this, how does On Live work exactly and don't you need super fast internet for that
That's beautiful, did you made it?MYE said:I know we are way past this shit but moving from the GC pad mockups and taking into consideration the "closest mockup to the real thing" rumor, I'm imagening a final product that looks something like this:
http://i.imgur.com/LVP3G.jpg
Jax said:that thing looks like it should cost $200++
MYE said:I know we are way past this shit but moving from the GC pad mockups and taking into consideration the "closest mockup to the real thing" rumor, I'm imagening a final product that looks something like this:
Big as shit but why not? As long as its not too heavy and thick.
The back of the tablet/controller would have "bumpy" grips to prevent this thing from sliding off your hands and the triggers/shoulder buttons would still respect the height of the left slider and 4 face buttons in the front.
It would be something diferent alright
edit: Removed the stupid blur effect
Refreshment.01 said:That's beautiful, did you made it?
Refreshment.01 said:But like you said too big. A way to go if asuming the screen would be embedded in the controller can be a clamshell design. My opinion is that is too lazy and uncreative for Nintendo to just take a tablet and slap some traditional buttons.
Skiesofwonder said:I think you should move the analog and buttons/d-pad to the side of the screen, making the controller much smaller.
But still my favorite mock-up yet.
That looks fantastic.MYE said:I know we are way past this shit but moving from the GC pad mockups and taking into consideration the "closest mockup to the real thing" rumor, I'm imagening a final product that looks something like this:
http://i.imgur.com/jTOin.jpg
Big as shit but why not? As long as its not too heavy and thick.
The back of the tablet/controller would have "bumpy" grips to prevent this thing from sliding off your hands and the triggers/shoulder buttons would still respect the height of the left slider and 4 face buttons in the front.
It would be something diferent alright
edit: Removed the stupid blur effect
Sell it as a flatpack. DIYcontrollers.Jax said:that thing looks like it should cost $200++
MYE said:I know we are way past this shit but moving from the GC pad mockups and taking into consideration the "closest mockup to the real thing" rumor, I'm imagening a final product that looks something like this:
Big as shit but why not? As long as its not too heavy and thick.
The back of the tablet/controller would have "bumpy" grips to prevent this thing from sliding off your hands and the triggers/shoulder buttons would still respect the height of the left slider and 4 face buttons in the front.
It would be something diferent alright
edit: Removed the stupid blur effect
Well theres disadvantages and advantages. Clamshell gives you a controller of more manageable and traditional size. The concept i imagined has 2 modes. One where the surface of the control is just the touch screen with just the 2 thumbsticks and 4 trigger buttons accesible. Then in the same controller the touch screen can be lifted and rotated to face the user, and reveals A,B,X,Y plus the D-pad.MYE said:yup. Thanks
Clamshell controller? hmm, dunno if i like that. Not very fond of hinges
Other thing with something that big, is that at some point it will need to rest at something other than your hands. I.E. if you are operating the left stick and trigger while at the same time using the touch screen.MYE said:Only reason i didnt do this was because having both your hands so low would leave alot of "dead wieght" on top of the controller.
I also tried to keep the hands as centered as possible without putting half the screen bellow finger level. It would be harder to rest my hands on my lap if there was too much controller in the bottom.
Leonsito said:I would put all the buttons/sticks below the screen, gameboy style.
Not really - a refresh cycle is 17ms, as long as the connection is stable there's no reason to ever hold the entire picture screen-side.Graphics Horsebut said:you probably need to add the time it takes to send the entire image.
Wow, I love this! Best mock-up so far by a mile. I just wish that all the rumors weren't saying that the controller looks like a GC controller so there was a chance that this was the real thingMYE said:I know we are way past this shit but moving from the GC pad mockups and taking into consideration the "closest mockup to the real thing" rumor, I'm imagening a final product that looks something like this:
http://i.imgur.com/jTOin.jpg
Big as shit but why not? As long as its not too heavy and thick.
The back of the tablet/controller would have "bumpy" grips to prevent this thing from sliding off your hands and the triggers/shoulder buttons would still respect the height of the left slider and 4 face buttons in the front.
It would be something diferent alright
edit: Removed the stupid blur effect
Doesn't look less comfortable than a 3DS. If anything, I'd move the D-pad and right analog up a bit, but that's pretty much it.Kandinsky said:It might be uncomfortable, but it looks soooooo goood.
radioheadrule83 said:I would not be against this!
Absolutely, the botton part of the device can have ergonomic curves a like a normal pad. Dont get why people are so dead set in portable designs.TheRagnCajun said:I think the problem with a lot of these mockups is they are modeling after a portable device, in terms of form factor. This device doesn't need to be flat, its not going anywhere. I'm envisioning a more conventonal and ergonomic shaped constroller, with a screen thrown in somewhere.
I would think that's where Nintendo is going with this but I hope that somewhere in Japan Iwata is lurking on GAF and sees MYE's mockup. Not only would something like that represent a real revolutionary controller change but seeing will probably make Steve Jobs spit coffee all over his beautiful cinema display.TheRagnCajun said:I think the problem with a lot of these mockups is they are modeling after a portable device, in terms of form factor. This device doesn't need to be flat, its not going anywhere. I'm envisioning a more conventonal and ergonomic shaped constroller, with a screen thrown in somewhere.
Krev said:MYE's mock-up is beautiful. If you could make a version based on Joey Fox's refinements, I imagine you'd have something close to what we'll end up with.
The crucial thing is the back of the controller. It needs to be ergonomic. Fortunately, Nintendo are trustworthy in that department.
Joey Fox said:Shittacular refinement of MYE's mockup.
TheRagnCajun said:I think the problem with a lot of these mockups is they are modeling after a portable device, in terms of form factor. This device doesn't need to be flat, its not going anywhere. I'm envisioning a more conventonal and ergonomic shaped constroller, with a screen thrown in somewhere.
SovanJedi said:Do you think having the controller come with its own screen (and some speculation pointing to it being used as a screen for when the TV is still being used by other family members) is an attempt for Nintendo to try and capitalise on the fact that the Japanese market has moved away considerably from normal consoles and more to handhelds? Granted you can't leave the house with it, but otherwise it still would have a lot of the same properties of handheld gaming.
rabhw said:As gigantic as a Nintendo fan as I am, I'm still not really sold on the whole controller with a big screen thing, with the streaming to the controller capability.
Why would I want to stream Mario Galaxy (using MYE's mockup as an example) to a small screen when I'm in my house. Particularly if I'm on my couch in front of my...TV, a much nicer, larger screen?
Is the idea that it becomes a "portable console within your house" so you can play in bed? Surely the latency of playing it further than that would make it useless.
What applications do you guys foresee developers using the second screen / streaming capability for? The common one that comes up is "picking your play in madden", but what else? I'm curious!
Da Sh!T! You find adding buttons to a tablet revolutionary? Your Brain most have exploded when you saw the Wiiremote then, and can't even imagine what happened what reaction the Kinect unleashed on you.Saint Gregory said:I would think that's where Nintendo is going with this but I hope that somewhere in Japan Iwata is lurking on GAF and sees MYE's mockup. Not only would something like that represent a real revolutionary controller change but seeing will probably make Steve Jobs spit coffee all over his beautiful cinema display.
I wonder if that same marketing (showing people playing the game) will work this time againMYE said:I know we are way past this shit but moving from the GC pad mockups and taking into consideration the "closest mockup to the real thing" rumor, I'm imagening a final product that looks something like this:
Big as shit but why not? As long as its not too heavy and thick.
The back of the tablet/controller would have "bumpy" grips to prevent this thing from sliding off your hands and the triggers/shoulder buttons would still respect the height of the left slider and 4 face buttons in the front.
It would be something diferent alright
edit: Removed the stupid blur effect
Refreshment.01 said:Da Sh!T! You find adding buttons to a tablet revolutionary? Your Brain most have exploded when you saw the Wiiremote then, and can't even imagine what happened what reaction the Kinect unleashed on you.
Joey Fox said:Shittacular refinement of MYE's mockup.
http://i.imgur.com/WFqF8.png[IMG][/QUOTE]
Not sure it would be an improvement. A diagonal relative positioning would make the D-pad and right analog stick easier to reach without changing the way you hold the controller. It's not a coincidence if all the home console controllers use that sort of setup.
On the 3DS Nintendo probably had to put the D-pad below the circle pad because of size/form factor limitations leaving them with no choice, and it shows. Switching between them is not exactly comfortable.
[QUOTE=SovanJedi]Do you think having the controller come with its own screen (and some speculation pointing to it being used as a screen for when the TV is still being used by other family members) is an attempt for Nintendo to try and capitalise on the fact that the Japanese market has moved away considerably from normal consoles and more to handhelds? Granted you can't leave the house with it, but otherwise it still would have a lot of the same properties of handheld gaming.[/QUOTE]
I'd say it's actually pretty likely.
beje said:Think on multiplayer card games where you're the only one allowed to see your hand, that's the easiest concept to grasp. Minimap and inventory management will be also very common if the screen is actually a touchscreen (would be idiotic not to do it). Some people really need to think out of the box and see further than "trollololol nobody wants to game on a 6" screen, gimme a huge TV".
I don't think that'll be the main use (I don't even think most games will support it's use that way).rabhw said:As gigantic as a Nintendo fan as I am, I'm still not really sold on the whole controller with a big screen thing, with the streaming to the controller capability.
Why would I want to stream Mario Galaxy (using MYE's mockup as an example) to a small screen when I'm in my house. Particularly if I'm on my couch in front of my...TV, a much nicer, larger screen?
Is the idea that it becomes a "portable console within your house" so you can play in bed? Surely the latency of playing it further than that would make it useless.
What applications do you guys foresee developers using the second screen / streaming capability for? The common one that comes up is "picking your play in madden", but what else? I'm curious!
MYE said:Flat panels are all the rage. People will look at something Ipad or Iphonish and feel like they are buying something new, modern and expensive looking.
Ergonomically, it would all depend on how they would shape the backside of the controller.
Yes it has been though, That would allow to have every control method but a transformable controller doesn't seem so hot with manufacturers. Explains why MS hasn't explored a split controller to complement Kinect yet.Mael said:Anyone thought it could actually be something like a wiimote attaching to a tablet with a nunchuck attaching on the other side?
That's not saying much really. One could claim theres a lot of revolutionary uses you can come up with a traditional dual thumbstick controller. Another thing is some of the possible uses of the screen has already been explored by Sega and NIntendo.agrajag said:The controller itself may not be revolutionary, but the new ways it might interact with the console sure is.
yeah... i've been trying to figure out how this would work... something more modular, so you don't always need to have a 6" screen attached. you'd need a lot of separate battery compartments...Mael said:Anyone thought it could actually be something like a wiimote attaching to a tablet with a nunchuck attaching on the other side?
rabhw said:Why would I want to stream Mario Galaxy (using MYE's mockup as an example) to a small screen when I'm in my house. Particularly if I'm on my couch in front of my...TV, a much nicer, larger screen?
That's clearly exactly what they're shooting for. I don't think that Nintendo designed this for large western households where everyone has their own TV but more for smaller Japanese households were consoles really battle for TV time.SovanJedi said:Do you think having the controller come with its own screen (and some speculation pointing to it being used as a screen for when the TV is still being used by other family members) is an attempt for Nintendo to try and capitalise on the fact that the Japanese market has moved away considerably from normal consoles and more to handhelds? Granted you can't leave the house with it, but otherwise it still would have a lot of the same properties of handheld gaming.
How would you describe it then? Those controllers are/were revolutionary and I certainly wouldn't describe using a tablet as a main console controller as evolutionary.Refreshment.01 said:Da Sh!T! You find adding buttons to a tablet revolutionary? Your Brain most have exploded when you saw the Wiiremote then, and can't even imagine what happened what reaction the Kinect unleashed on you.
rabhw said:As gigantic as a Nintendo fan as I am, I'm still not really sold on the whole controller with a big screen thing, with the streaming to the controller capability.
Why would I want to stream Mario Galaxy (using MYE's mockup as an example) to a small screen when I'm in my house. Particularly if I'm on my couch in front of my...TV, a much nicer, larger screen?
Is the idea that it becomes a "portable console within your house" so you can play in bed? Surely the latency of playing it further than that would make it useless.
What applications do you guys foresee developers using the second screen / streaming capability for? The common one that comes up is "picking your play in madden", but what else? I'm curious!
Refreshment.01 said:Yes it has been though, That would allow to have every control method but a transformable controller doesn't seem so hot with manufacturers. Explains why MS hasn't explored a split controller to complement Kinect yet.
Or not it's not like battery pack for handhelds are expensive anyway.birdchili said:yeah... i've been trying to figure out how this would work... something more modular, so you don't always need to have a 6" screen attached. you'd need a lot of separate battery compartments...