DefectiveReject
Banned
No I'm not.BurntPork said:Nintendo's not going to risk putting out a poorly cooled machine like Apple. The last thing they want is a machine that overheats by design. If you were to play intense games daily on your Mac Mini, it will die eventually. That's why the Mac Mini isn't intended for gaming. You're making a totally pointless comparison.
I stated in both freaking posts the WiiU will use far more efficient processors and the WiiU merely has to play games, and do some network communication.
And I think I may of mentioned the WiiU will have 40in3+ of space to put in some decent cooling.
Regardless my iMac is on 24/7 as Will the Mac Mini Server, as servers generally tend to run 24hrs a day.
My iMac does rendering, image and media processing for 12-14hrs a day and has NO problems at all.
I also noted both will do different jobs but it was an example of HOW MUCH you can get into a small space with good and efficient design.
I mean CNET did a Mac Mini review a short time back, and tested it against an HP slimline, which was slightly higher spec but a windows equivalent. Although it's casing was >2x the size of a Mac Mini, and some parts where higher spec (better graphics card, more memory, different CPU with higher clock speeds) you didn't get 2x more performance out of the HP. The mini beat it in some aspects and lost out in others, but not by a lot. So space and size doesn't necessarily = performance
So taking the punch in a Mac Mini and making it gaming relevant WITH THE ADDITIONAL SPACE WiiU has over a Mac Mini, your argument about size being an issue is in my opinion wrong.
So no I'm not saying a WiiU is a mac mini. Only that you can be small and powerful and don't have to let size matter.
Oh and yeah with WiiConnect24 running my Wii runs hot. Running hot != overheating