ShockingAlberto
Member
Except the 360.phosphor112 said:As they do for ANY console released.
Except the 360.phosphor112 said:As they do for ANY console released.
I think they will assuming they're using non 6900 series tesselation which are terrible and not really worth the transistor cost which would be better spent on more stream processors or something else which would increase performance. The tesselation unit in R700 isn't a lot better than the one in the 360 and that one is borderline useless and has only been used on a few titles very sparingly.blu said:That is under the assumption Nintendo would remove tessellation capabilities from their rumored GPU, correct?
EatChildren said:That is not my stance nor intention and I'd appreciate it if you didn't pigeon hole me, thanks.
EatChildren said:Tessellation will be a deal breaker, I think. I expect the PS4/Xbox3 GPUs to be fully equipped for heavy tessellation, whereas I'm not so sure about the Wii U. Tessellation can be hit and miss when half arsed, but when done right it adds a tremendous amount of detail a scene. It would be a fairly affordable addition to a next generation console GPUs with significant graphical advantages.
EatChildren said:I agree with this, but I do think early on tessellation will be one of the graphical show pieces for next generation consoles. It will be a great way to make your game's geometry look a hundred fold more detailed at a minimal cost, which will really stand out against Wii U releases (assuming they're lacking tessellation).
Shots fired. :lolShockingAlberto said:Except the 360.
phosphor112 said:Oh yeah, definitely. In this day, there is no reason NOT to have a GPU with Tessellation. Not to mention that would allow some complex cloth physics as well. It's not just that though, Sony and MS will show off their power in new ways. Not just graphics, but engines that do things we haven't seen before on consoles, and maybe even PC's. That's the great thing about consoles. Heavy optimization allows you to take complete advantage of the hw, and I think they will brag as much as they can about it.
And like I said.. connectivity. I think PS4 will also support Vita remote play for all PS3 games, Maybe even PS4. MS will up the stakes with XBL, and Sony will push new PSN features that Nintendo can't touch. As I said before, even with EA helping them, the infrastructure is new for them and they have A LOT to catch up with. Hell, they can't even do a basic game online.
Daschysta said:Because nintendo isn't retarded and there is no reason to remove it, almost any graphics card they could possibly use would support it, and devs seem to be happy with the specs. It's far, far more likely that they support tesselation than the other way around. It's not like the wii, where they made a concious decision to not go HD, the wii-u uses modern hardware, and to remove the tessellation would be neither cost saving, nor beneficial.
most initial devkits are a mess...sometimes final devkits are a mess as well (360 lol).Smiles and Cries said:are we talking about a PC or WiiU here?
We have rumors that devs are happy but just months before we had rumors that the WiiU devkits are a mess. We can hope for the best but to expect such a thing without a word of it is setting yourself up for a meltdown
Nintendo isn't retarded is a hard thing to prove -_-
where is my Xenoblade NOA?
Smiles and Cries said:We have rumors that devs are happy but just months before we had rumors that the WiiU devkits are a mess.
phosphor112 said:GT5 and any other racing sim. Not only do the physics calculations take a crap ton of processing. iRacing lets you turn down the graphics to look like poop just to make sure you can run their physics engine. This is a sim that has NO AI and still needs a lot of power.
You seem so sure about this...
I've always had lag issues. Though Ad-hoc mode for Mario Kart DS runs perfectly, even on game share.
The cell blade =/= CBE for PS3. Not to mention pretty much all CPU manufacturers are looking into symmetrical processing.
As they do for ANY console released. It's not like costs will be much higher to look at something newer.
But because it's Nintendo we're talking about it's "OMG FUCKING NINTENDO'S FUCKING UP!"Shin Johnpv said:Every first gen devkit is a mess. This isn't anything new or different.
"It's definitely a possibility for the future. We'll look at any platform that will support that games we're trying to make, but that's the key thing - the console has to support the game as it is designed.
"The more changes we have to make to a game the less and less palatable it becomes because making a game is an enormous process. Just doing 360, PS3 and PC - I don't think people understand the amount of work that goes into that. All of the localisation you have to do... all of the testing you have to do... on every platform in every language... It's a pretty huge undertaking.
So you aren't just supporting the Wii U; You're supporting it in English, French, Italian, German and Spanish.
"We'll see. It's definitely a possibility."
Smiles and Cries said:are we talking about a PC or WiiU here?
We have rumors that devs are happy but just months before we had rumors that the WiiU devkits are a mess. We can hope for the best but to expect such a thing without a word of it is setting yourself up for a meltdown
Nintendo isn't retarded is a hard thing to prove -_-
where is my Xenoblade NOA?
Smiles and Cries said:Nintendo isn't retarded is a hard thing to prove -_-
where is my Xenoblade NOA?
If by CC2 you mean CC1 with online MP and new dungeons.Andrex said:Crystal Chronicles 2 (on Wii U, with multiple tablet controllers) will be infinitely better than 13-5 or whatever the main series is crapping out nowadays. Mark my words.
Smiles and Cries said:excite
I want an exclusive racing series on WiiU that is not F-Zero or Mario Kart /this is not a dream
And art by Yoshida.Lonely1 said:If by CC2 you mean CC1 with online MP and new dugeons.
Lonely1 said:If by CC2 you mean CC1 with online MP and new dugeons.
manueldelalas said:What is the technology of the Wii U streaming?
...do you even know how Remote play works? Sony can easily enforce a mandatory memory/proc allocation for the PSV remote play on all games. Obviously you can't play all PS3 games remote play on Vita, but if KZ3 can do it, I'm sure most other games can do it as well, it's just a matter of people going back to optimize the software.Daschysta said:Vita isn't capable of playing all ps3 games via remote paly (the ones that push ps3 hardware) It won't be capable of playing ps4 games.
Is something known about this technology?StevieP said:We don't know, but it's certainly not Wifi. It probably shares more similarities to WiDi than it does Wifi.
Smiles and Cries said:Nintendo Defense Force is deep in here, making me sound like Drinky Crow vs Ninthings
dammit forgot about the excite series... no do not want that one.
I want something to go against Forza and GT - don't make me settle for 3rd party Dirt game or EA racing
oh no Crusin' series keep it dead
phosphor112 said:...do you even know how Remote play works? Sony can easily enforce a mandatory memory/proc allocation for the PSV remote play on all games. Obviously you can't play all PS3 games remote play on Vita, but if KZ3 can do it, I'm sure most other games can do it as well, it's just a matter of people going back to optimize the software.
Hell, the PSP can run GTA4 (though with lag) just by clicking a checkbox.
It will support tessellation. If you think Nintendo will be dumb enough to completely remove an essential feature, that is beyond cynical. There's not even a precedence for them doing such a thing. AFAIK, they didn't remove any features from the 3DS GPU, so why would they do so for Wii U? What would be the point? There's no logic behind that level of cynicism.EatChildren said:Correct.
Forgive me, but when it comes to video games I live in a bleak, cynical world of bitterness. Especially when it comes to console hardware, and especially when it comes to Nintendo. I don't like applying 'out of the box' hardware features to devkits. Things can change, people make decisions, sometimes right sometimes wrong. No matter how probable or what the devkit cards are based on, I wont be convinced (nor unconvinced, for that matter) that the Wii U has decent tessellation support until I hear it. Neutral I remain.
Smiles and Cries said:Nintendo Defense Force is deep in here, making me sound like Drinky Crow vs Ninthings
dammit forgot about the excite series... no do not want that one.
I want something to go against Forza and GT - don't make me settle for 3rd party Dirt game or EA racing
oh no Crusin' series keep it dead
Nintendo is not going to do that game, why? because they don't know how to make them, because even if their close third party developers know, those games are EXTREMELY expensive to make if they want to do something like Forza or GT, and it won't sell.Smiles and Cries said:Nintendo Defense Force is deep in here, making me sound like Drinky Crow vs Ninthings
dammit forgot about the excite series... no do not want that one.
I want something to go against Forza and GT - don't make me settle for 3rd party Dirt game or EA racing
oh no Crusin' series keep it dead
manueldelalas said:You could as well wait for an Uncharted killer or a FF killer from Nintendo.
Smiles and Cries said:Nintendo Defense Force is deep in here, making me sound like Drinky Crow vs Ninthings
dammit forgot about the excite series... no do not want that one.
I want something to go against Forza and GT - don't make me settle for 3rd party Dirt game or EA racing
oh no Crusin' series keep it dead
I've got ideas, but no funding.Ubermatik said:Yeah man, I hear you. We need WiiU exclusives - GOOD Wii U exclusives. A solid FPS/Racing/Adventure title is what the system needs.
Lol, playing it right now; but it isn't a FF killer, let me explain.Ushojax said:That already happened. Xenoblade, baby.
Gravijah said:so you want nintendo... nintendo. to make a sim racer. a sim racer.
Smiles and Cries said:damn guys they have to start some where
MS had to start its racing somewhere.
The only reason Nintendo never made a serious racer is because you guys wont stop buying Mario Kart
cannot wait for Mario Kart 8! yay :|
Was MK announced? EXCIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITE!Smiles and Cries said:damn guys they have to start some where
MS had to start its racing somewhere.
The only reason Nintendo never made a serious racer is because you guys wont stop buying Mario Kart
cannot wait for Mario Kart 8! yay :|
You have some serious issues...Smiles and Cries said:damn guys they have to start some where
MS had to start its racing somewhere.
The only reason Nintendo never made a serious racer is because you guys wont stop buying Mario Kart
cannot wait for Mario Kart 8! yay :|
Smiles and Cries said:damn guys they have to start some where
MS had to start its racing somewhere.
The only reason Nintendo never made a serious racer is because you guys wont stop buying Mario Kart
cannot wait for Mario Kart 8! yay :|
Ubermatik said:I actually can't.
Ubermatik said:Yeah man, I hear you. We need WiiU exclusives - GOOD Wii U exclusives. A solid FPS/Racing/Adventure title is what the system needs.
*EDIT*
Didn't realise you meant Nintendo - you kerazy. I'm talking about a 3rd party exclusive.
Lol, playing it right now; but it isn't a FF killer, let me explain.
Although the game is better than any single FF game released, it CLEARLY doesn't have the production values of any FF since VII. I was speaking of production values... as in expensive to make.
Nintendo said third parties'll be able to do 3D, right?
StevieP said:The third party exclusive is pretty much dead. Thank dev costs.
.