Maybe not in terms of raw GPU horsepower, but (as someone mentioned upthread) for all we know, it could require a component like a tesselator that Wii U's GPU might lack. That's the issue.
Why would Wii U lack a tesselator unit, though?
Maybe not in terms of raw GPU horsepower, but (as someone mentioned upthread) for all we know, it could require a component like a tesselator that Wii U's GPU might lack. That's the issue.
Why would Wii U lack a tesselator unit, though?
Umm... I'm a Nintendo fan, just as big of one as the most of you. In fact I'll even admit that I'm biased towards games from them or even exclusive games on thier platforms. I want them to succeed more then any other company in the world.I'll also take this moment to heartily laugh at those who like to cast wide statements regarding Nintendo fans. We're a pretty varied group, and have our share of "intra-family" food fights regarding gaming issues.
Place the discs with your wiimote OR the touchscreen!so there is a toilet fresh duck game coming to WiiU?
what else have I missed?
so there is a toilet fresh duck game coming to WiiU?
what else have I missed?
Power isn't everything.
New info has surfaced that the Nintendo Juicy will be at about the same power level as a 360, maybe a bit less.
I think there was some other stuff we covered, but it wasn't power-related, so I didn't pay too much attention..
Place the discs with your wiimote OR the touchscreen!
Umm... I'm a Nintendo fan, just as big of one as the most of you. In fact I'll even admit that I'm biased towards games from them or even exclusive games on thier platforms. I want them to succeed more then any other company in the world.
It just irks me when I go into Wii threads and everybody is like "graphics don't matter" then we have the same people in this thread praying for a strong console and shunning anyone saying anything "negative" about the Wii-U's power and praising anyone saying anything "positive" about the Wii-U's power.
A lot of you are just as bad as the trolls who said they couldn't play Wii games because they "didn't look good enough".
Ohh I see.. well, I had to ask
it was easy because I've seeN this duck's commercial since the 90's LOL
hurr...germany got rid of that duck! we now have a superior.....TRIANGLE!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oo5U1dlxr6w
http://i.imgur.com/YwYmj.jpg[IMG]
BACK TO TOPIC NOW! :3[/QUOTE]
Oh god, what the fuck? That's horrible! When it zoomed out at the start, I laughed though :)
It amazes me how many people seriously don't understand what an engine and its limiting factors are. I'm going to keep quoting this in every thread necessary until people stop spreading FUD. An engine's theoretical limits do not represent the barrier for entry.I wonder how many people here seriously thought this thing would come even close to running UE4...
Nintendo fans never fail to amuse.
I'm just going to reiterate what I said on the previous page. People need to stop thinking that engines and their editors are intimately tied and scaled to top of the line specs and hardware as a baseline. Whether or not UE4 is supported on Wii U is merely limited by what technology components they deem integral to the operation of UE4. For example: what level of DX or GL does X card support? Does it support fixed or flexible pipelines? It is not based on the raw power of the device, as the idea of an engine is to be flexible, powerful and as low-impacting as possible, so you can squeeze as much as you can out of it.
SOURCE: someone whose job it is to make/maintain an editor and its engine.
Oh god, what the fuck? That's horrible! When it zoomed out at the start, I laughed though![]()
Captain Smoker said:
Umm... I'm a Nintendo fan, just as big of one as the most of you. In fact I'll even admit that I'm biased towards games from them or even exclusive games on thier platforms. I want them to succeed more then any other company in the world.
It just irks me when I go into Wii threads and everybody is like "graphics don't matter" then we have the same people in this thread praying for a strong console and shunning anyone saying anything "negative" about the Wii-U's power and praising anyone saying anything "positive" about the Wii-U's power.
A lot of you are just as bad as the trolls who said they couldn't play Wii games because they "didn't look good enough".
For me it's irrelevant: 3000US$ PC, 3340px? Is there even a TV doing this? And lol at the brown blur, it's almost a cliché.Could they look like the GTA IV iCEnhancer Mod? ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBw0R1AUU64 ). Or even better?
Yeah that's something I was asking myself earlier. I'm not a 3D tech guy, but do some web programming. I use a pretty powerfull framework that can be compared in some way to a 3D engine, I can built great web apps with it but it also does Hello World demos. I mean, Nintendo can very well make a Wii Sports 1 on UE3 if they wanted, isn't it?It amazes me how many people seriously don't understand what an engine and its limiting factors are. I'm going to keep quoting this in every thread necessary until people stop spreading FUD. An engine's theoretical limits do not represent the barrier for entry.
New info has surfaced that the Nintendo Juicy™ will be at about the same power level as a 360, maybe a bit less.
I think there was some other stuff we covered, but it wasn't power-related, so I didn't pay too much attention..
For me it's irrelevant: 3000US$ PC, 3340px? Is there even a TV doing this? And lol at the brown blur, it's almost a cliché.
Yeah that's something I was asking myself earlier. I'm not a 3D tech guy, but do some web programming. I use a pretty powerfull framework that can be compared in some way to a 3D engine, I can built great web apps with it but it also does Hello World demos. I mean, Nintendo can very well make a Wii Sports 1 on UE3 if they wanted, isn't it?
Umm... I'm a Nintendo fan, just as big of one as the most of you. In fact I'll even admit that I'm biased towards games from them or even exclusive games on thier platforms. I want them to succeed more then any other company in the world.
It just irks me when I go into Wii threads and everybody is like "graphics don't matter" then we have the same people in this thread praying for a strong console and shunning anyone saying anything "negative" about the Wii-U's power and praising anyone saying anything "positive" about the Wii-U's power.
A lot of you are just as bad as the trolls who said they couldn't play Wii games because they "didn't look good enough".
Seriously, how some gafers can still write "same power than Xbox360" after all the infos saying the contrary ?
...
well you know, kids gotta know that it is cool to put chemical stuff that touched your dirty toilet in your eye!
EDIT:
![]()
Methinks HylianTom was playing around Ideaman. He doesn't seem like the type of guy who holds that opinion truly.
Seriously, how some gafers can still write "same power than Xbox360" after all the infos saying the contrary ? It's so difficult to read all the sentences of a message + take into consideration all the other data that points to a completely different situation ? Wii U =/= Xbox360, it's crystal clear, it's a fact, well, even better, it was a fact some months ago, so it can only get better. And i'm talking tech-wise but also even with the results on screens. Even for "just" third-parties ports. So you can expect to say wow for optimized and tailored-for-the-system first parties and exclusive titles.
Some have the extrapolating-illness![]()
I don't know what the French term for it is, but in English it's called "confirmation bias."
Umm... I'm a Nintendo fan, just as big of one as the most of you. In fact I'll even admit that I'm biased towards games from them or even exclusive games on thier platforms. I want them to succeed more then any other company in the world.
It just irks me when I go into Wii threads and everybody is like "graphics don't matter" then we have the same people in this thread praying for a strong console and shunning anyone saying anything "negative" about the Wii-U's power and praising anyone saying anything "positive" about the Wii-U's power.
A lot of you are just as bad as the trolls who said they couldn't play Wii games because they "didn't look good enough".
... and to think what Zora's Domain might look like... hnnnggghhhh.
I'm starting to doubt IdeaMan... is that... wrong?
I'm starting to doubt IdeaMan... is that... wrong?
AWWWWW YEAAAHHH...
![]()
WAIT! :3
I'm starting to doubt IdeaMan... is that... wrong?
We know the controller. We know the storage media. We know Nintendo games will be the prime draw. U's capabilities and the multiplatform situation are the big, related unknowns.Well it's pretty obvious that the vast majority in this thread think otherwise because the overwhelmingly popular topic for 45,000+ posts has been about the power of Wii-U.
Was a source for that ever given? Because I don't remember it either.HylianTom said:Yep. Other than missing/forgetting about rumble, I've been paying attention.![]()
I find it amazing, that despite everything that's been heard, some people insist on clinging to some fantasy that Wii U is going to rival the next gen consoles, and not the current gen. When this strategy makes no sense for Nintendo, not for pricing, not for getting current gen ports.
All of a sudden, just so some people can do some tech spec. dick waving, it's no longer good enough that Nintendo is putting out an HD console that is going to have some fantastic looking first party content, and likely will get a lot of the third party content that the Wii missed out on last gen.
- For the last goddamn time, the ability to run UE4 is going to depend more on required feature sets than it will on the ability to push polygons. Expecting UE4 on Wii U is not unreasonable. At all. Especially since we have no clue whatsoever what's going to be required to run it. None. Zero. Nada. Zilch.
Methinks HylianTom was playing around Ideaman. He doesn't seem like the type of guy who holds that opinion truly.
I'm writing an entire psychology research paper in 3 hours so I won't be here much today but are you guys seriously still arguing about power? I might take a break from posting in here until the next investors meeting, this is getting sad.
edit: the people who are being dramatic should either stop caring about the Wii U or wait until e3 to voice your disappointed opinion because you're just blowing hot gas at this point.
I'm starting to doubt IdeaMan... is that... wrong?
You contradict yourself in the same point.
You contradict yourself in the same point.
http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/news/29563NintendoWorldReport said:The cheap or potentially free downloadable shooter on Wii U will have DLC.
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Online, which is coming to Wii U around the system's launch, is slated to have in-game purchases, according to a member of the development team.
The game is currently in beta on PC, and shows off a store lets you buy new items with in-game currency that you can earn while playing or you can buy "Ghost Coins" with real-world money. According to our source, this will be nearly identical to how it works on the Wii U.
The developer didn't mention many specifics about the controller, but did make the point to say that you'll be able to hot-switch your weapons and gear between respawns, which is a likely use for the touch screen on the Wii U controller.
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Online is currently in beta testing on PC. It's been in development on Wii U since approximately March 2011. You can read our E3 2011 preview and impressions for more info.
Tell me what's wrong
How can i try to alleviate your doubts ?
Well, i know some members will still not believe in my information even after my efforts to try making them legit. Keep your critical mind, it's the thing to do with second-hand knowledge info and not straight facts from the manufacturer. Even in the latter, it's not always the truth so![]()
cell phone shots of the dev kit, of course.
So this is going to take the F2P route?