UnblessedSoul
Member
2 billion watching...what
Wes said:Yeah I really don't know how busy the high streets will be. Nothing really to judge it against. Could be dead, stuff could be closed, or could be busy with so many off work. I imagine there's a fair few who have taken this week to go abroad anyhow.
Best of luck to you on your big day too!
I already made this argument.Jeff Albertson said:It seems like every third post in this thread is either, 'no way 2 billion' or 'I'm not interested it's boring'
If you're not interested why post in the OT? Do you go through every thread on the gaming side saying 'I am not intersted in this game and can't see why anybody should be'.
Not even close, Diana's funeral was 2.5B and it's the not the biggest according to wiki.Veidt said:I don't believe in the 2 billion watching hypothesis.
The world cup, is the single most televised event in human history. And that brings in about 750 million viewers.
There are alot of old people in the world tho.Veidt said:I don't believe in the 2 billion watching hypothesis.
The world cup, is the single most televised event in human history. And that brings in about 750 million viewers.
Jedeye Sniv said:The last thing i remember that was similar was Diana's funeral, the shops were deserted then (but open nonetheless!). My local comic store is closedthough, that sucks.
And thanks, I'll need it![]()
From what I can tell, anything that claims to have 1B+ viewers is based almost purely on speculation (and I'm sure some highly exaggerated counting methods as admitted by FIFA and the NFL).StuBurns said:Not even close, Diana's funeral was 2.5B and it's the not the biggest according to wiki.
I didn't see this answered, but I thought it was fairly well established that Hewitt didn't even meet Diana until Harry was around 2 years old. Besides, even if he was, Harry doesn't have much better to look forward to:SmokyDave said:On the left is Diana's 'friend', James Hewitt...
![]()
Mmm hmm.
Apple Sauce said:ITT: Americans act confused at people's displays of irrational, mindless patriotism like they haven't had the monopoly on that shit for decades.
VelvetMouth said:It's just some Gaffers trying to act above it all. For every Gaffer yawning at the wedding there are thousands upon thousands of Americans who can't get enough. Our local news affiliate sent people over to report on the wedding for the past week. If you dare to read Yahoo reader comments on wedding stories, even the Amerika Fuck Yeah! crowd are talking about America and it's good friend the UK and how we will stand together bullshit and how great the Queen is.
Last night I tried to find some news on the tornadoes. CNN and Anderson Cooper were all about the wedding. Tried Fox News, they had a couple of minutes of breaking news to update on the weather and then switched back to SKY news so that we could watch British coverage.
adamsappel said:I didn't see this answered, but I thought it was fairly well established that Hewitt didn't even meet Diana until Harry was around 2 years old. Besides, even if he was, Harry doesn't have much better to look forward to:
![]()
It's all estimation/guesswork/specualtion when you reach such high numbers. Should they not estimate because some people wont believe what they come up with? This is the media, they love throwing around numbers.Xilium said:From what I can tell, anything that claims to have 1B+ viewers is based almost purely on speculation (and I'm sure some highly exaggerated counting methods as admitted by FIFA and the NFL).
Jason's Ultimatum said:More like it shows how tawdry our society really is.
surriously?UnblessedSoul said:2 billion watching...what
Wow, everyone meet the most excited person in the thread.VelvetMouth said:Yes because getting excited over a royal wedding once every 20+ years is so much more tawdrier than watching Jersey Shore, 16 and Pregnant and a bunch of overpaid goons running after a ball every Sunday and then spending hundreds of dollars on jerseys to show your support of said goons.
Mecha_Infantry said:Ps* Jay & Silentbob will be covering it live, so you know I'm going to be watching that!
LQX said:Wow, everyone meet the most excited person in the thread.
Because we haven't seen it yet?Your Excellency said:Why is nobody talking about the dress?!
Cindres said:I'm in the mood to watch this now for some reason... Was gonna just watch it for the laugh but now i actually want to see it for the spectacle. Hell i was doing all the Wiki reading up and jesus it's a very meticulously planned event.
Still you are acting very extra as if those not interested fall into stereotype, many, me included have said we are watching.VelvetMouth said:Silly me. I forgot to go into an OT thread act misserable and uninterested. What can I do to redeem myself, should I type *yawn*, is that edgy enough?
They aint got shit on the Life Guards.verbum said:I just like all the uniforms, insignia, and rituals. Like being back in Victorian England. The Coldstream Guards are a favorite.
Love George MacDonald Fraser books. Especially the Flashman series. And the Patrick O'Brian
books featuring Jack Aubrey.
CHEEZMO said:They aint got shit on the Life Guards.
LQX said:Still you are acting very extra as if those not interested fall into stereotype, many, me included have said we are watching.
Wes said:Hah really? Will it be streamed somewhere?
ROYALE WITH CHEESE!
Me & Mewes cover the Royal Wedding LIVE on Ustream!
At 2am Los Angeles time, 5am New York time, 10am UK time, watch us watch a wedding!
CHEEZMO said:Because we haven't seen it yet?
Frankly, I dont give a toss.Your Excellency said:Yeah but who's it gonna be? Anyone really think she has the balls to come out in the outlandish Alexander McQueen Ice Queen outfit that many seem to be predicting?
Divvy said:I genuinely do not understand why so many people find this interesting.
Suairyu said:Will be watching tomorrow. Unlike people doing their best impressions of ostriches in this thread, I can acknowledge the importance of tomorrow's event even if I don't in theory like the existence of the Royal Family.
Tell the truth politics rarely diverge on to British monarchy so I'm not sure were you are getting that from.Suairyu said:What makes me confused more than anything is the (mostly American, but often not) 'all or nothing' stance that decrees the British monarchy a threat to the very fabric of democracy itself. I believe it comes from the same crowd that labels Obama 'left wing'/'socialist' because he isn't as right-wing as Rush Limbaugh.
Will be watching tomorrow. Unlike people doing their best impressions of ostriches in this thread, I can acknowledge the importance of tomorrow's event even if I don't in theory like the existence of the Royal Family.
Mecha_Infantry said: