aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah haahahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaMecha_Infantry said:United Kingdom important country
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah haahahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaMecha_Infantry said:United Kingdom important country
anonnumber6 said:That got 715 million viewers, still far short of 2 billion
Jenga said:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah haahahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Ponti said:I couldn't give a fuck either but the amount of really bitter posts in here is hilarious. America isn't in the spotlight so commence the shit talking it seems.
We need to chip in to a paypal account to get Korey & Jenga tickets to the wedding (and maybe some little Union Flag bowler hats?). Their feigned indifference is painful to watch and I'm starting to feel bad for living their dream whilst they stand on the sidelines, shouting through bitter tears.Ponti said:I couldn't give a fuck either but the amount of really bitter posts in here is hilarious. America isn't in the spotlight so commence the shit talking it seems.
gerg said:Bear in mind, though, that her marriage probably wasn't as well and as thoroughly broadcast through the various forms of media as Will and Kate's will be.
Kurtofan said:Will Camilla Parker Bowles become the queen of England when Charles is King?
Wes said:Aww jeez. Camping for a spot/interview? Really?
And Kate Middleton?Mecha_Infantry said:
Kurtofan said:Will Camilla Parker Bowles become the queen of England when Charles is King?
Actually, should could be, but has chosen not to take the title.Mecha_Infantry said:
What I was wondering.. right to ascension would take precedent over any powers the Queen possesses correct? So technically when the time comes, the Queen can't really say "Sorry Charles, it's going to be William". Charles would have to abdicate correct? Unless there's some rule where the entire Royal Family can align against him.gerg said:Better question: will Prince Charles become King of England?
pestul said:What I was wondering.. right to ascension would take precedent over any powers the Queen possesses correct? So technically when the time comes, the Queen can't really say "Sorry Charles, it's going to be William". Charles would have to abdicate correct? Unless there's some rule where the entire Royal Family can align against him.
Yeah that's what I meant, the consort type, not the ruler type.StuBurns said:Aren't there two 'tiers' of Queens? The current one is Regent, but you can be some lame Queen too I believe.
pestul said:Actually, should could be, but has chosen not to take the title.
Kurtofan said:And Kate Middleton?
Mecha_Infantry said:Isn't against the law/whatever it's called that a divorcee can't be a King/Queen?
I'm just going by Wikipedia, which is probably wrong lol.Mecha_Infantry said:Isn't against the law/whatever it's called that a divorcee can't be a King/Queen?
Camilla's style and title in full: Her Royal Highness The Princess Charles Philip Arthur George, Princess of Wales and Countess of Chester, Duchess of Cornwall, Duchess of Rothesay, Countess of Carrick, Baroness of Renfrew, Lady of the Isles, Princess of Scotland.[34]
Because the title 'Princess of Wales' remains strongly associated with the previous holder of that title, the late Diana, Princess of Wales, Camilla is referred to with the feminine form of her husband's subsidiary title, Duke of Cornwall.[3] Also, unless a specific Act of Parliament is passed in the United Kingdom to the contrary, Camilla will, upon the accession of her husband, legally be queen.[35][36] However, it has been indicated that when the Prince of Wales accedes to the throne, Camilla will remain styled as Her Royal Highness, with the title of The Princess Consort,[37] similar to the style of Prince Albert. Note that this is not the same usage as her father-in-law, HRH The Prince Philip, whose official title does not include the word "consort."
gerg said:This, too.
Although I thought that she couldn't even be a Princess, so maybe I'm wrong on this as well.
Wiki said:A queen regnant (plural "queens regnant") is a female monarch who reigns in her own right, in contrast to a "queen consort", who is the wife of a reigning king. An empress regnant is a female monarch who reigns in her own right over an empire.
Queens regnant possess and exercise sovereign powers. The husbands of queens regnant do not usually share their wives' rank, title or sovereignty. Queens consort share their husbands' rank and titles, but do not share the sovereignty of their husbands.
gerg said:This, too.
Although I thought that she couldn't even be a Princess, so maybe I'm wrong on this as well.
Wiki said:A queen regnant (plural "queens regnant") is a female monarch who reigns in her own right, in contrast to a "queen consort", who is the wife of a reigning king. An empress regnant is a female monarch who reigns in her own right over an empire.
Queens regnant possess and exercise sovereign powers. The husbands of queens regnant do not usually share their wives' rank, title or sovereignty. Queens consort share their husbands' rank and titles, but do not share the sovereignty of their husbands.
Wes said:If Charles does ascend to the throne Camilla would technically be a queen but would be titled The Princess Consort. The public would not stand for her being titled Queen. Much in the same way now she is referred to as the Duchess of Cornwall but she is also the Princess of Wales but for obvious reasons people dont call her that.
Meus Renaissance said:Honest question. Would you rather attend/watch this wedding or the wedding of a Gaffer? If i had an invite to attend either, I would go to the Gaffers wedding.
Pakkidis said:Can someone explain the power the Royal Family has and why they are so important. I get the feeling it is more about status than it is about any actual power.
OMG Perfect. I fucking love Koodo. The turkey with popcorn and binoculars in the iTunes thread and now this. I can't stop laughing.Koodo said:R I P
Jedeye Sniv said:I'm going to enjoy going into town tomorrow afternoon to get lunch and seeing how deserted it is. Although I am worried that nothing will be open. Fair play to the couple, I hope they're happy but I've got no desire to join in the frothing anticipation. I've got my own wedding next week to worry about, I'm sick of the bloody things now!