Windows 8's uptake falls behind Vista's pace

Status
Not open for further replies.
Right. Both W7 and W8 have the problem of taking out the sub folders in the start menu.

If I want to for example, put all the video editing tools in a sub folder, I can't do that. I have to remember the freaking name of the subtitle tool I used once last year in order to bring it up. However I usually only remember the color/shape of the program icon. This is not a problem with XP.

That's why I got a X301 which still support XP drivers.

The lack of sub menu is a problem in W7 you can get around with a few hacks. Its a lot worse in W8's UI. Also when I said the text only UI, I meant the Windows Phone 7 UI specifically.
Wouldn't adding those video editing tools to their own tile work (would show their icons)?
Or adding them as sub-folders on the start menu and show all apps (would show them grouped by their sub folder)?
 
Right. Both W7 and W8 have the problem of taking out the sub folders in the start menu.

If I want to for example, put all the video editing tools in a sub folder, I can't do that. I have to remember the freaking name of the subtitle tool I used once last year in order to bring it up. However I usually only remember the color/shape of the program icon. This is not a problem with XP.

That's why I got a X301 which still support XP drivers.

The lack of sub menu is a problem in W7 you can get around with a few hacks. Its a lot worse in W8's UI. Also when I said the text only UI, I meant the Windows Phone 7 UI specifically.

Can you not just make a subfolder in All Programs?
 
Because many people (including me) are right brain people, we don't memorize item by their names, but rather the shapes and colors of items. Its vitally important to include icons with vibrant colors for the applications/apps. That's how we search an app and launch it.)

That's why a human interface, with text only, is very bad UI ergonomic.

Whoever designed MS's "metro" interface, are clearly ignorant of this idea.

What? Do you know anything about design, at all? Metro was chosen because it's the same design style found in almost every single airport, transit station and subway system in the world. Combining simple icons with text is easy to look at and conveys it's message well - and you say it's an awful design decision? Give me a break.

Plus it uses a grid structure which is even better than an arbitrary list of tiny program icons in older start menus...
 
Right. Both W7 and W8 have the problem of taking out the sub folders in the start menu.

If I want to for example, put all the video editing tools in a sub folder, I can't do that. I have to remember the freaking name of the subtitle tool I used once last year in order to bring it up. However I usually only remember the color/shape of the program icon. This is not a problem with XP.

That's why I got a X301 which still support XP drivers.

The lack of sub menu is a problem in W7 you can get around with a few hacks. Its a lot worse in W8's UI. Also when I said the text only UI, I meant the Windows Phone 7 UI specifically.

There are still sub folders in W7 unless I'm missing what you're talking about.
 
No idea what you're even talking about now. Was this somehow related to the quoted? No, I don't think you understood the vein of conversation. Like, at all.

and lol @ "..for more than 20 minutes...". I'm up around 100 hours now (3 format & reload-style clean install and setups WHILE teaching others the ropes). Not even sure what that moment of venting was about, but I lol'd anyway. Fanboys will be fanboys.


You misunderstood. My issues with Xbox Music are far, far deeper than simple search. That was just an issue among many (in the case of music search, more options hidden under menus like right-clicking in IE for tabs, lol). But that was just more of a concern than anything else. The real criticism (if you'd like to call it that) is that Xbox Music isn't a very good application (design), irrespective of the search option location. That's what we were talking about and a number of others in this and the OT commented in agreement. The UI of the entire application compared to other applications (like Zune OS and Zune music player on Windows UI; not just where search was. It's just very plain-jane. Dry. Devoid of any meaningful features (even in the hidden settings section). Tons of space wasted. No way to quickly get to say...the R artists outside of Search (at least, not with a mouse and keyboard). Or, no way that's particularly intuitive or obvious. Let me know when you catch up. I don't know; I just figured that with how nice the Zune OS was and how nice the Zune Windows app was, some of that style and smoothness would have carried over to this music app but nope. It's probably the worst looking, uninspired and feature-devoid music app I've ever used. 3 cheers for more options than the default metro music app, though.

So you've used the os for 100 hours, and you state everything in Start is new.....

Okaaaay.

Start in 8 contains a few select Metro apps by default and the usual Shortcuts the old start had....

You are either massively over complicating what Start is, or after 100 hours you still don't understand it...

Apple and Android both have poor apps also, it's nothing new, but we aren't even discussing apps.
 
Right. Both W7 and W8 have the problem of taking out the sub folders in the start menu.
7vaXb.png
 
i guess microsoft needs to unlock windows upgrade hole again to boost sales figures? lol.
Still havent install my win8 copy...like no point especially when games performance suffered dips from win7.

hate to use metro with my mouse. hate the whole apps apps apps thingie.
 
i guess microsoft needs to unlock windows upgrade hole again to boost sales figures? lol.
Still havent install my win8 copy...like no point especially when games performance suffered dips from win7.

hate to use metro with my mouse. hate the whole apps apps apps thingie.

What games?
 
You either never watched the video or have trouble understanding English. He was using a touchpad. Movement from the far edge of the touchpad is interpreted as a swipe motion. Did you see the part where the settings window is empty? That never happens in 7.
touchpad gestures are meant to mimic a touch screen. So yes there is swiping. But when using the touchpad like a mouse, (moving the cursor) there is no swiping, you use the left corner to do the task switching and the scroll bar to move left, right.
 
Watching it crash and burn is incredibly pleasing. Bring back the traditional interface, banish the idea of the store forever.

Hopefully Microsoft will see the error of their ways and go back to a formula that works with Windows 9. Maybe they'll even start to make amends as soon as SP1 rolls around, that would be a nice gesture.
 
How do you create a new empty folder in Start menu> "All programs?"
The same way that you switch tabs in Metro apps, apparently... by using an unexplained process

Creating sub folders in the start menu is a power user function; switching tabs is basic square fucking one functionality, on the other hand.
 
The same way that you switch tabs in Metro apps, apparently... by using an unexplained process

Creating sub folders in the start menu is a power user function; switching tabs is basic square fucking one functionality, on the other hand.

I don't know what the fuck you guys are talking about. Show me a video how to create new sub folder in w7 start menu.
 
vista was great after a while
the "perception" that is sucked ass would never go away though so

I don't know, I am using Vista right now and it's still quite shitty compared to W7. Of course it was W2000 shitty at first, even worse even, but Windows 7 really took all the good features from XP and Vista and left most of the shitty ones behind. Only thing W7 misses is fucking tabs in Windows Explorer and W8 still doesn't have that.

I don't know what the fuck you guys are talking about. Show me a video how to create new sub folder in w7 start menu.

C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs. Create new folder etc.
 
Nobody liked the ribbons but Microsoft. For everyone else, they've been lateral moves. Just a change to accept and learn, not something many particularly enjoy.

Bullshit. Ribbons UI was a necessary move in order to make Office more userfriendly, because with all the options implemented in Office applications, the interface was more and more complex and clunky. Ribbons helped exposing options that many people didn't even know exist because they were hidden behind complicated menu trees. With ribbons all options are visible and easily available. While designing the whole ribbon interface Microsoft did a lot of usability research with users - both experienced ones and unexperienced. Just watch this presentation: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2008/03/12/the-story-of-the-ribbon.aspx

The same applies to implementing ribbon in Explorer. Many options, that were hidden behind menus, right-click or shortcuts are now exposed. So someone, who doesn't know that Ctrl + A selects all items, now can simply click the "Select all" icon that is right there in the toolbar.
 
Windows 8 and Metro was clearly designed with the tablet in mind. And for a desktop/laptop that doesn't use touch, this is wrong. How can you even defend that?

I've used Windows 8 on the new laptop that I got for my parents. It's confusing as hell. The only thing that makes it usable is the old desktop. I used the metro IE. Switching tabs feels like an impossible and frustrating task.
 

good read.

Bullshit. Ribbons UI was a necessary move in order to make Office more userfriendly, because with all the options implemented in Office applications, the interface was more and more complex and clunky. Ribbons helped exposing options that many people didn't even know exist because they were hidden behind complicated menu trees. With ribbons all options are visible and easily available. While designing the whole ribbon interface Microsoft did a lot of usability research with users - both experienced ones and unexperienced. Just watch this presentation: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2008/03/12/the-story-of-the-ribbon.aspx

The same applies to implementing ribbon in Explorer. Many options, that were hidden behind menus, right-click or shortcuts are now exposed. So someone, who doesn't know that Ctrl + A selects all items, now can simply click the "Select all" icon that is right there in the toolbar.

did you have your browser open to a page from a week ago or something? we've long, long, long moved past talking about ribbons. catch up.

nobody liked the ribbons at launch. they grew to accept them over time, like most changes.
 
did you have your browser open to a page from a week ago or something? we've long, long, long moved past talking about ribbons. catch up.

nobody liked the ribbons at launch. they grew to accept them over time, like most changes.
Well...exactly! When you're a company like Microsoft and hundreds of millions of people are affected by even the tiniest change, of course you're going to hear a lot of noise about it, despite whether or not its justified. But just like ANYTHING, people will eventually accept it. Same thing will happen with the Metro UI.
 
did you have your browser open to a page from a week ago or something? we've long, long, long moved past talking about ribbons. catch up.

If by "week ago" you mean "yesterday", then... still no. ;) Just wanted to put my 2 cents in.
And I really recommend watching the video.


nobody liked the ribbons at launch. they grew to accept them over time, like most changes.

Dunno about "nobody", but many people didn't like ribbon without even trying it just because it was different. I know, because I was such a person. I didn't want to install Office 2007 because I thought the ribbon is stupid just by looking at the new UI. And I know at least few people who acted the same way. However, once I used it, I didn't want to go back.

People will always be opposite to drastic changes simply because it forces them to relearn stuff. Doesn't always mean those changes are bad.

That said, I still think Metro UI in Windows 8, on desktop, isn't carefully thought out. It is functional, but there are many annoyances that makes things unnecessarily complicated or hard to learn/understand.
 
If only Microsoft added a 5 minute tutorial when you first install Win8. Most of the "where the hell is this?" or "how do you do that?" questions and bad impressions will be avoided.
 
If only Microsoft added a 5 minute tutorial when you first install Win8. Most of the "where the hell is this?" or "how do you do that?" questions and bad impressions will be avoided.

that is what I dont understand. a short video intro would have been easy to implement and helped a lot. but whatevs, I could use windows 8 perfectly the first time i used it, since I actually informed myself.
 
that is what I dont understand. a short video intro would have been easy to implement and helped a lot. but whatevs, I could use windows 8 perfectly the first time i used it, since I actually informed myself.

There is a video that plays when you log in for the first time. It shows you how to get to the charms with a mouse and with touch, if you have touch hardware on your PC. It's very simple, but gets the job done, because that's really all you need to know from the start.
 
vista was great after a while
the "perception" that is sucked ass would never go away though so

Though I agree that the negative reaction to Vista was overblown, let's not re-write history to make it some sort of innocent victim of hysteria. Vista deserves to go down in infamy if only for the 'Vista Capable' disgrace. Microsoft in collaboration with hardware vendors knowingly sold a defective product to millions of people.
 
There is a video that plays when you log in for the first time. It shows you how to get to the charms with a mouse and with touch, if you have touch hardware on your PC. It's very simple, but gets the job done, because that's really all you need to know from the start.

That's assuming everyone sits in front of their PC while Windows 8 is installing. Which is funny when you consider that MS has gone on record to make it one of their goals with Vista onward compared to XP is quicker more streamlined installs that require less interaction from the user.
 
Just picked up the Lenovo Yoga, and its my first experience with windows8. I think it even booted up to a quick tutorial (very basic). I was pretty much functional within the first 15 - 30 minutes, then spend the better part of a day just playing with it. Reading about the keyboard shortcuts; it's almost all about the windows key + ..., and search. I cant stress this enough: Windows key+X/Win + C are your friends.

The only real problems I've come across are the "white list" in IE 10 and general application compatibility issues (specifically GNS3). Outside of that it boots wicked fast, runs wicked smooth, and I frequently jump in and out of metro to the desktop and visa versa. The desktop is for very granular editing, creation oriented stuffs, and meaningful configuration changes, while metro is mainly a consumption interface. as I say, I swap in and out of both effectively, and this is also the first time I've actually enjoyed using IE! (at least until we get a metro version of chrome)

I've only had this for about 72 hours, but I like it, plus the hardware takes great advantage of the OS by going full tablet when needed.
 
nobody liked the ribbons at launch. they grew to accept them over time, like most changes.
I actually liked them, though I did have to do some relearning to use them. They follow a lot of good user interface principles.

Though, I really wish you could search for menu commands by name. I've wished for that for years, but recently discovered Ubuntu lets you do that.
 
Windows 8 and Metro was clearly designed with the tablet in mind. And for a desktop/laptop that doesn't use touch, this is wrong. How can you even defend that?

Because this is slow:

original.jpg
 
If only Microsoft added a 5 minute tutorial when you first install Win8. Most of the "where the hell is this?" or "how do you do that?" questions and bad impressions will be avoided.
That would help, but the core problem is that the OS feels like two different OSs welded together. One for tablets and one for desktops. The fact that it's not intuitive is a huge mark against it.
 
Because this is slow:

original.jpg
Because you don't like someone's customised start menu? That's not what it looks like by default under Windows 7.

Unless I've customised mine so much that I no longer remember the default... I'm pretty sure the focus is on recently used programs. Search and pinned programs do the rest.
 
Because you don't like someone's customised start menu? That's not what it looks like by default under Windows 7.

Unless I've customised mine so much that I no longer remember the default... I'm pretty sure the focus is on recently used programs. Search and pinned programs do the rest.

Twirling down folders is just as bad. What if the program isn't recently used? What if you can't remember the name of the program you want?

I don't know why people are so enamored with the Start menu, I've always found it slow and clunky as a launcher.
 
The old start menu is better for businesses that have dozens of apps and want there to be consistency with app launch placement. Basically you need to learn to hit WinKey+ type app name if you do software development, otherwise you'll have to parse people's start screens or go to all apps to find what you want. The pitfall of customized start screens, which I favor for home use, is that it makes things different per PC at work.
 
Twirling down folders is just as bad. What if the program isn't recently used? What if you can't remember the name of the program you want?

I don't know why people are so enamored with the Start menu, I've always found it slow and clunky as a launcher.

You don't have to use it if you don't want to. There are a number of ways to open up paint in a traditional windows environment.
 
Good lord, replace Paint with any program. It was just the first picture I found. I'm not basing my workflow around the fastest way to launch Paint lol
 
Good lord, replace Paint with any program. It was just the first picture I found. I'm not basing my workflow around the fastest way to launch Paint lol

But you can pin any program there. Or you can make a shortcut. Or you can type it in the search. Or you can put it on the quick launch bar. Hell, you could have it start with Windows if you'd like.
 
Windows 8 is primarily a tablet OS, right? Apple and Google have spent years building up their library of apps and fine tuning their OSes. What good reason does anyone have to go for Windows 8 when you could go for iOS or Android?
 
you mention pin to start menu, that's the whole concept of Start Screen, personalizing so you don't have to through cascaded menus.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom