brotkasten
Member
Should've posted this earlier.
It's on 5 unless it was upgraded in which case the browser is atrocious. They didn't have a competent browser until RIM bought Torch Mobile. I'm comparing IE9 to the browser in BlackBerry 7, Android 2.3, and iOS... like 3 years ago when it was still better than this.It's a company provided phone, so its a curve 9300 and probably BBOS6 (im not sure).
My exprience of web browsing on that phone is unbearable. It is way too slow in rendering, the small screen doesn't help and switiching tabs is so slow it is unusable.
To be fair i suspect all data traffic on that phone goes through encryption, and though my company's blackberry server which probably adds to the slowness.
You should also start working on the new OP
You should also start working on the new OP
Speaking of the OP, are we omitting a numeral for the name? Windows Phone |OT2| instead of Windows Phone 7?
This makes sense.Speaking of the OP, are we omitting a numeral for the name? Windows Phone |OT2| instead of Windows Phone 7?
There's a question mark in the current OP. I doubt well get/need an op anytime soon.You should also start working on the new OP
I'm waiting for AT&T to approve the new OT. They should roll it out with the 8107 update.
That's the plan.
I'm waiting for AT&T to approve the new OT. They should roll it out with the 8107 update.
Ok I Legit lold.I'm waiting for AT&T to approve the new OT. They should roll it out with the 8107 update.
That's the plan.
Sure, but relative to iOS/Android it's lacking in many aspects.WP isn't quality software?
Sure, but relative to iOS/Android it's lacking in many aspects.
Sure, but relative to iOS/Android it's lacking in many aspects.
When it came out, Topolsky said it was on par with iOS 5.
Few weeks later it was only "almost on par" with iOS 5.
Now it's some POS software.
That's because Windows Phone hasn't evolved like the others have. Google squashed hundreds of bugs with 4.04 and iOS updated so that your battery doesn't die from Siri and iCloud. Progress.
I own a Windows Phone and overall I like it but I'm really disappointed at the speed that updates are coming out. Microsoft is late to the party and their attitude seems to be want until Windows Phone 8 to fix the issues and probably after that is wait until Windows Phone 8.5.
They want to work at their own speed but the competition is moving way too fast for them to do one major update a year like Xbox. If they're going go throw money at projects why not get more developers to help them get Windows Phone 8 out faster instead of these stupid smoked by Windows phone ads that back fired on them? Microsoft doesn't seem to understand that users actually like using their phones and like spending time on them so who cares if you can check Facebook 2 seconds faster than IOS and Android.
I'm with Josh in his review, this OS has the potential to be the best but it seems like the execution is not there and the glaring flaws are obvious if someone has ever used another OS. Microsoft needs tough love or else they'll keep pretending everything's all right and going as planned because i don't think for one second they thought they were this far behind from the competition.
Yes, I'm sure the 5.1 and 4.0.4 update completely changed the experience of iOS and Android. I wish Microsoft would finally fix that keyboard bug that was introduced with Mango.
that should of been fixed a long time ago, if not fixed it might not be MS fault but the phone supplier....you are talking about the problem where the keyboard disappears?
Yes, I'm sure the 5.1 and 4.0.4 update completely changed the experience of iOS and Android. I wish Microsoft would finally fix that keyboard bug that was introduced with Mango.
This sarcastic comment will take the place of the one I was about to post.
I own a Windows Phone and overall I like it but I'm really disappointed at the speed that updates are coming out. Microsoft is late to the party and their attitude seems to be want until Windows Phone 8 to fix the issues and probably after that is wait until Windows Phone 8.5.
They want to work at their own speed but the competition is moving way too fast for them to do one major update a year like Xbox. If they're going go throw money at projects why not get more developers to help them get Windows Phone 8 out faster instead of these stupid smoked by Windows phone ads that back fired on them? Microsoft doesn't seem to understand that users actually like using their phones and like spending time on them so who cares if you can check Facebook 2 seconds faster than IOS and Android.
I'm with Josh in his review, this OS has the potential to be the best but it seems like the execution is not there and the glaring flaws are obvious if someone has ever used another OS. Microsoft needs tough love or else they'll keep pretending everything's all right and going as planned because i don't think for one second they thought they were this far behind from the competition.
I agree and disagree. Everyone at this point is releasing one new version of their OS each year, and then minor upgrades/bugs/fixes/tweaks etc... throught the rest. Nobody is really moving faster than anyone else at this point.
That being said you could say MS is behind the curve on certain things so they need to move faster to play catch up, and I'd agree to a certain extent.
The main key here is to see what happens post Win 8. The main block WP has currently is the Kernel, and since MS seems to be switching to a unified kernel across all Win 8 platforms once that hits it might be different. At this point there isn't anything MS can really do with the OS until we get the new kernel.
That being said once the Kernel hits with Apollo all bets are off. MS needs to get on that in terms of updates hard and fast.
HEY dLMN8R
Wait for Apollo, man.
Why would the ecosystem get the same score X months later if the same problems are still there? Seems pretty clearcut to me.It's the fact that the Verge gave the 800 a 7.9 and rated the software and ecosystem much higher than what the Verge rated the 900.(which got a 7.0)
Be consistent or don't but either way don't blame the readers when you aren't consistent and are full of shit.
I'll PM you my PayPal if that's okay.
HEY dLMN8R
Wait for Apollo, man.
I'm surprised that people here have taken such issue with The Verge's review when I of all people completely agree with it.
The ecosystem still sucks. It deserves to be rated worse now than on the Lumia 800 FIVE MONTHS ago. The competition is improving, Windows Phone has not.
The sheen has worn off of Windows Phone for me. When I put something in my pocket, it needs to be able to quickly and efficiently get things done. It needs to trump other devices in its class. It needs to be the best and Windows Phone is far from it at this point.
Now of course you have your twitter trolls going ""LOL Snake"
I think that perhaps one of the things that makes the Verge review stand out, is that he chose to plant his flag right now, and decided to score the OS down for these shortcomings instead of whisking it away with "Sure, it doesn't have this or that, but its a new OS". He seems to make it very clear:
I have read the Anandtech review, and the others on all the other sites. They all vaguely touch on the exact things he mentions, its just that they all feel WP is still comfortably in the "But its new" phase, so they didn't take off review points for it.
This guy did. I think a much more interesting question would have been whether or not he was fair in deciding that the OS is now old enough to be held beside Android and iOS at a 1:1 ratio like that. At least some actual discussion can come from that, especially since that seems to be the real problem. Calling the guy a hipster fanboy is pretty pointless, even if it happens to be true.
while yes it is new, its still late to the party and someone walking into the store doesn't give a shit if it came out in 2010. They care how it compares to the competition.The platform is new though. The Nokia lumia 900 is only a second gen device. Same for the Titan 2. I truly think apollo will make or break the platform.
Cipher said:I have read the Anandtech review, and the others on all the other sites. They all vaguely touch on the exact things he mentions, its just that they all feel WP is still comfortably in the "But its new" phase, so they didn't take off review points for it.
AT&T said last month that when Nokia’s new Lumia 900 phone went on sale April 8, it would benefit from the company’s biggest product introduction ever, exceeding even the iPhone’s.
The big day is here. But nearly all 39 AT&T stores within proximity of Times Square in Manhattan were either closed for Easter Sunday or did not answer phone calls. The few that were open did not have the handset in stock.
When AT&T stores within five miles of Times Square were contacted around noon, 18 of them played an automated message saying they were closed for Easter. Nineteen stores that were authorized AT&T resellers did not answer the phone, and two AT&T resellers that were open said they did not have the Lumia 900 yet.
The stores that played the automated voice message also played a short advertisement for the iPhone 4S and made no mention of the Lumia 900. “Visit our store to see the exciting iPhone 4S and how only AT&T’s network lets your iPhone 4S download three times faster,” a female voice said.
There was some Lumia-related action in Times Square on Friday night, when Nokia sponsored a performance by the pop singer Nicki Minaj to spread the word about the phone. Nokia roped off a section of Times Square and blasted promotional messages on screens for the show, and even served free signature cocktails with names like “Lumia Light” and “Beautifully Different.” There was only a single table of Lumia 900 phones on display, ignored by most of the guests in attendance.
The platform is new though. The Nokia lumia 900 is only a second gen device. Same for the Titan 2. I truly think apollo will make or break the platform.
http://www.theverge.com/2012/4/9/2935314/the-lumia-900-is-indeed-my-next-but-heres-the-problem
is there a reason he lists Gmail as a no? Gmail support is built into the phone. Why do you need a Gmail app?
From further down in the quote section:
- @tomwarren I’m just really accustomed to being able to archive and label. gmail for android seriously spoils you.
It isn't so much the lack of an app, but the functionality that's missing from Android Gmail..
The marketplace and consumers aren't going to give WP a break because it came out late in the game.The platform is new though. The Nokia lumia 900 is only a second gen device. Same for the Titan 2. I truly think apollo will make or break the platform.
ah, ok. I couldn't get the comments to load.
are labels not the same thing as folders? I have a label called "Newsletters" set in Gmail that filters newsletters (obviously). I press "..." and then folders and it's there. I can move emails to and from it and they're labelled in Gmail when I go back.
ah, ok. I couldn't get the comments to load.
are labels not the same thing as folders? I have a label called "Newsletters" set in Gmail that filters newsletters (obviously). I press "..." and then folders and it's there. I can move emails to and from it and they're labelled in Gmail when I go back.
PSGames said:With this thread being in Community and all is there a thread for the Lumia in off topic?
His self-appointed retirement from leaking Microsoft rumors later this month is apparently not stopping the MS Nerd from revealing some new tidbits concerning the upcoming Windows Phone 8 Apollo release in a series of tweets today.
He sheds some light onto Nokias WP8 devices, which will include a PureView flagship (albeit with the Nokia N8′s 12 megapixel sensor) with a ClearBlack 1280×720 display destined for Verizon, and a QWERTY landscape-slider with a traditional 4″ WVGA display set to arrive on Sprint. The rather interesting part here, however, is the chip these devices are supposed to be running on: the MSM8960, part of the Snapdragon S4 family. For readers unfamilar with Qualcomms product range, the S4 is the second generation dual-core Snapdragon that can also be found Android devices such as the AT&T version of the HTC One X; despite only sporting two cores, its CPU performance is actually comparable to if not better than the quad-core Tegra 3 from Nvidia, whereas its GPU performance falls short.
As for the other two major US carriers, MS Nerd claims that T-Mobile will get an HTC device for launch while AT&T is getting two Samsung devices.
Regarding hardware partnerships, Lenovo and ASUS are said to be joining the likes of Nokia, HTC and Samsung as Windows Phone OEMs, whereas theres no sign of LG, Dell or Acer.
Yea there is one. Search for "don't wait for apollo" and we should be there since all we are talking about at this point is the Nokia lumia 900. but I am really lazy.... Like super lazy.....uuggghhhWith this thread being in Community and all is there a thread for the Lumia in off topic?
Does Verizon even have any windows phones? If so, are they selling?Today is the day I gotta hunker down and brave all the 900 pictures and impressions right? (where are they?) Few of you getting one today?
Also, rumors:
So AT&T gets the Lumia. Verizon possible gets super PureView phone. Plausible?
I'm not gonna lie I'll be pissed if Verizon get's that phone and AT&T which has been supporting the platform since the beginning doesn't.