Trojita
Rapid Response Threadmaker
True best boy
You support bullying?
True best boy
Should I stop posting?
Legit question...
Should I stop posting?
Legit question...
No, that's the wrong thing to take from what Jex just said.
Should I stop posting?
Legit question...
You support bullying?
I support powerful good looking characters that grow and develop over the course of an anime for the better.
I'd pay to see this.If I felt so inclined, have no fear, I would do that overtly.
Except for you. Please refrain.No one's been asked to stop posting.
You wanna go bruv? Leggo bruv..If I had a problem with someone in particular, have no fear, I wouldn't hesitate to bring that up, and directly.
It seems pretty serious to me.
Good on Narag for calling out patterns of behaviour that he feels are negatively impacting the thread/community. He clearly wants to promote a better community overall and sometimes doing that requires taking people to task over certain issues. This goes beyond whether people have done something overt like broken the rules of the forum and instead deals with more nuanced matters.
I don't encourage randomly taking people to task over every little personal gripe in a bitchy manner, that rarely leads to any good outcomes. However, you can criticise someone in a well reasoned manner that hopefully leads to a more reasonable discussion. Woofington, for his part, has responded reasonably and at length to Narag's comments, so good on him for taking that on.
Also, I don't think that everyone needs to rush in to 'calm' people down if there's something actually objectionable going on in the thread. I don't enjoy engaging in conflict with others, but sometimes it has to be done.
This isn't really about Woofington and Narag though. Their dialogue is emblematic of wider issues in the community as a whole and that is one of thread leadership/domination.
I think it stands to reason that in any community on the internet, in the absence of extremely vigorous moderation, a power vacuum will eventually appear. Someone will appear with more time or interest or dedication than everyone else and their voice/voices, if unchecked, will eventually become a defining factor of that community. This is problematic for a variety of reasons:
1) Such figures generally tend to narrow the field of discussion by bringing an exaggerated focus to their personal interests.
2) This, in turn, attracts more people like them to the discussion, further reducing the variety of opinions in the community.
3) When a singular voice dominates, people who have differing approaches/interests tend be put-off from engaging in the community. This is especially true when someone is playing some kind of 'character'.
4) Now, nearly everyone puts on some kind of personality when posting online - we all play a certain characters, wear certain masks for certain people etc.
The problem is that these 'dominating' figures in the thread tend to have a very exaggerated character that appears to be formed simply to garner attention and generate more interest in their own posts. Many people find the artificiality of this to be at best, tiresome and at worst obnoxious.
4) When someone dominates in terms of sheer force of post count they're generally watering down the signal to noise ration of useful commentary in the thread because their spamming a bunch of filler 'noise' into the thread. This means that the thread becomes less readable because its filled with fluff (not so much a problem at the moment, but it was emblematic of the Cajun era).
It's not really interesting to read a thread where a couple of people make up most of the posts because, by definition, it's harder to see the other opinions that come from other 99% of people who post in the thread.
So, in short, it's nearly always interesting to see a variety of people with interesting opinions post just a bit, then to see or two people swamp a thread with their content.
This could all be solved by a Group Watch of AO.
I am against, however, things like, "I like anime X" and a person responding "ugh, you shouldn't like anime x."
This stifles actual discussion more than anything, and gets people to either leave the community or devolve the discussions. Neither of which I think this community wants.
I'm starting Motto Ojamajo Doremi soon. PLEASE BE EXCITED.
I support powerful good looking characters that grow and develop over the course of an anime for the better.
Why can't we go back to the days when our nasty feuds were over who posted the news first?
On episode 16!I'm still waiting, bruv.
I already told Cornbread that I was in for a group watch of AO!This could all be solved by a Group Watch of AO.
People here may not think much of it and it seriously much less intense right now, but the quick negativity some people here have over some title clearly must keep people away.Yeah. I'm fine with 'I dislike this anime you like for reasons 1,2 and 3', not so much 'anime x is terrible and anyone who disagrees is doing anime wrong'.
Why can't we go back to the days when our nasty feuds were over who posted the news first?
This could all be solved by a Group Watch of AO.
That sounds more like a suicide pact.
Usually, more "veterans" of AnimeGAF use this as a joke. But to more newcomers, it can come across as demeaning and anti-newcomer.
I am with you in spreading more discussion and less noise. But what happens when people perceive a sincere opinion as noise? Or as disingenuous? Who is to say that a person is being genuine with how they feel about any one particular show?
I am against, however, things like, "I like anime X" and a person responding "ugh, you shouldn't like anime x."
This stifles actual discussion more than anything, and gets people to either leave the community or devolve the discussions. Neither of which I think this community wants.
I loved it. KyoAni saving what KyoAni ruined, specifically reaction faces.
Holy shit, I totally forgot about that.Why can't we go back to the days when our nasty feuds were over who posted the news first?
Yuasa's second film for this spring, Lu Over the Wall, has just been announced with a snazzy trailer. Opens May 19.
I'm curious, we need to do this.. lol
On episode 16!
Imagine a SAO sequel where everything you loved about SAO got retconned in the worst possible way and pulled out all the stops to ruin the happy ending that you loved in it as nothing more than a "fuck you", where at the same time you can barely figure out what's going on or piece together what anything going on in the sequel has to do with what was good in the original.
That's what Eureka Seven AO is.
That sounds alright for SAO
I thought this was a Rebellion hatepost.Imagine a SAO sequel where everything you loved about SAO got retconned in the worst possible way and pulled out all the stops to ruin the happy ending that you loved in it as nothing more than a "fuck you", where at the same time you can barely figure out what's going on or piece together what anything going on in the sequel has to do with what was good in the original.
That's what Eureka Seven AO is.
I thought this was a Rebellion hatepost.
I thought this was a Rebellion hatepost.
Imagine a SAO sequel where everything you loved about SAO got retconned in the worst possible way and pulled out all the stops to ruin the happy ending that you loved in it as nothing more than a "fuck you", where at the same time you can barely figure out what's going on or piece together what anything going on in the sequel has to do with what was good in the original.
Megumin2 is back. Also, a lot of Megumin in this episode, no Darkness and Aqua getting eaten. Nice.
Wait, you guys had feuds on who posted news first? lol I never noticed that.