[Little Witch Academia] - 4
To avoid sounding like a completely joyless automaton, I do have to say that there are some things I liked about this episode:
- Good faces, as always.
- Lotte did stuff.
- Lotte & Akko interacted in a manner which actually helped resolve the story.
- Some side characters got a little bit of characterisation.
- Akko continues to be a character with no moral compass. Last week she had no problem cheating to win, this week she steals food because she feels like it. I consider this a positive because at least it makes her a little different from all the other protagonists she resembles.
Meanwhile, there's a number of things that I am less than thrilled about:
- What purpose does Sucy serve again? Why is she involved in anything?
- Lotte is characterised but her characterisation is predicated entirely her around her otaku-ish love for a series of novels. People aren't solely defined by their interest in one particular hobby, so I hope we can see her new found personality applied more widely than this one case.
- Speaking more generally of Lotte's story this week - she doesn't have one. She starts and ends the episode in the exact same place. She has obstacles she has to overcome (getting out of school, finding Annabel and persuading her to write) but these are all ultimately in service of nothing. She is not changed by the conclusion, nor has she apparently learnt any lessons. We, as an audience, certainly know more about her, but that's about it.
- Now there's actually two stories going on in this episode which are intertwined - Lotte's and Annabel's. I didn't find anything particularly compelling about Annabel's story either because we spent so little time with her. We meet her, learn about her problem, and resolve it all within the space of about 2 minutes. Its extremely rushed and, as such, it doesn't really mean anything to us when Lotte helps resolve the issue - because we don't care.
- I understand that the theme of this episode was essentially "Love what you want to love, don't listen to people who tell you otherwise" but I can't say that the way the episode made that argument was particularly compelling. What's being defended in this episode is a literally endless series of increasingly trashy and hacky novels. I don't know if the show actually spends enough resources explaining why this particular method of escapism (or any escapism) is worthy of defence.
- A great deal of the background art in this episode was charmless.
- The whole "Twilight Parody" thing was rather awkwardly transparent.
Basically what I'm saying is - find a better writer. These concepts aren't that complicated. Even Mari Okada could implement them better.