I don't know if I'm the first to point it out or if it's intention but this thread's title has extremely uncanny parallels to the results of election.
I am a little bit happy by the way that the european numbers are down. I was really annoyed how Rowling marketed her fancy american school, that so much better then the european shithole of Hogwarts is. Now she gets her payback.
Also it shows that she needs to move on. Cursed Child was stupid shit, this seems to flop. Do something else.
LOL, cant wait to not care about the remaining 4 movies
$8.75M in previews for Fantastic Beasts. Lower those expectations.
I saw it was headed for a $90M OW...is that lower than expectations?
Deadline's early Friday number is $30M including previews and mid 70s this weekend.
Also, Doctor Strange was around $525M worldwide as of yesterday. It will pass X-Men Apocalypse worldwide on Saturday. Domestically, it already passed Apocalypse on Monday.
Honest question. How big would the X-Men be under Marvel studios?
The presence of Fantastic Beasts isnt exactly rising the tide for other pics out there, with frosh titles getting squashed. STXs The Edge Of Seventeen is currently filing below its $8M-$10M projection with $5M-$7M. However, this is a great movie that needs to be discovered, and with Fantastic Beasts pulling in 53% female, 54% over 25 and 37% between 18-24, that doesnt help this James L. Brooks comedy production.
Open Road didnt even report a Thursday night preview number for its boxing movie Bleed For This, which is not a good sign. The Ben Younger-directed biopic about world champ boxer Vinny Paz is punching low between $2.5M-$4M, under the $5M the distributor was hoping for. Open Road snapped up Bleed For This for $4M at the 2015 Cannes Film Festival.
Sony/TriStar/Studio 8s Ang Lee soldier PTSD movie Billy Lynns Long Halftime Walk at 1,176 screens is forecasted to walk away with $2M-$3M. The adult-demo movie is off to a horrible start with critics at 42% Rotten.
Maybe if Marvel waited a decade. I think audiences are largely done with the X-men for the foreseeable future.
Before the Avengers, they were the biggest superhero team. They were better known to the general public than The Avengers or The Justice League.Honest question. How big would the X-Men be under Marvel studios?
Honest question. How big would the X-Men be under Marvel studios?
Also, Doctor Strange was around $525M worldwide as of yesterday. It will pass X-Men Apocalypse worldwide on Saturday. Domestically, it already passed Apocalypse on Monday.
Youtube views never lie.
Honest question. How big would the X-Men be under Marvel studios?
They can just wait Fox out and have the X-Men when they inevitably reboot the MCU.
Maybe if Marvel waited a decade. I think audiences are largely done with the X-men for the foreseeable future.
Rupert Murdoch's FOX will not be handing out the X-Men license to Marvel in any foreseeable future. If FOX were to be finished with the X-Men IP following Logan's release, Marvel would still have to wait until 2024 before the rights revert back to them. Good luck.
I don't think that's the case. That's FF's rumored contract.
XMen is probably under the same kind of deal as Spiderman's contract (i.e. 3 years to have a movie in pre-production/5 years to release IIRC).
The highest viewed trailer has about 12M, which is very low for this kind of film. Looking at youtube views doesn't take into account other social media platforms, of course, but I've found trying to parse that information very difficult now that companies have started to tout trailer views in marketing.I thought Fantastic had a healthy amount of youtube views?
Well, we were considering the hypothetical of Marvel getting the rights now, anyway.Rupert Murdoch's FOX will not be handing out the X-Men license to Marvel in any foreseeable future. If FOX were to be finished with the X-Men IP following Logan's release, Marvel would still have to wait until 2024 before the rights revert back to them. Good luck.
For your information, Deadpool has a different contract in place and is not considered to be part of the FOX deal with Marvel and X-Men.
Well, we were considering the hypothetical of Marvel getting the rights now, anyway.
There were rumors recently of another X-men film with Fassbender, McAvory, and Lawrence too, right?
If I'm not mistaken Deadline had an article about FOX's Marvel rights (I'd have to find it) and both stipulated that FOX had rights to Fantastic Four and X-Men with a seven year time lapse (add one year if in pre-production).
I don't think that's the case. That's FF's rumored contract.
XMen is probably under the same kind of deal as Spiderman's contract (i.e. 3 years to have a movie in pre-production/5 years to release IIRC).
If you could find that article that would be great, but I think that's for the FF.
How is my $250MM domestic and $700MM worldwide prediction looking?
Man now I imagining a Russo brothers plotted fight with Beast
I think we can't judge a Marvel owned Xmen till we see how Spidey performs next year.
Does Fox retain the rights as long as they make anything with mutant characters in it? There are a ton of movies they could make without the word X-Men in the title if they want to string along those rights for a decade or two while hunger for X-films has some time to recuperate.
Spider-man Homecoming is still a Sony film. Marvel Studios is producing, but Sony is free to fuck up its ad campaign and other details as much as they like.
Monster Trucks gives me hope that someone will greenlight my own shitty movies.
God bless America.
Beast is only gonna do mid 70s this weekend? Wasn't it tracking for $90- $100 million a few weeks ago? What happened?
Was cursed child really that bad?Maybe Cursed Child did more damage than anyone thought, or maybe the name doesn't have the recognition WB thought it would.
Was cursed child really that bad?
By the way, it's not only the rumored "Fantastic Four" contract that FOX had with Marvel that had a seven year time lapse - Daredevil and Elektra had the same terms.
Daredevil's IP rights reverted to Marvel in 2012 following Elektra's release in 2005 (7 year time lapse) given that FOX had nothing tangible for a Daredevil feature film.
In regards to the article, trying to find it but nothing currently.
Daredevil rights from Deadline: http://deadline.com/2013/04/toldja-daredevil-rights-revert-from-fox-to-disney-481886/
Correct: "400 characters that Fox owns"
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/deadpool-guardians-galaxy-2-were-because-a-mixup-947712
I think we can't judge a Marvel owned Xmen till we see how Spidey performs next year.
I'm surprised Beasts is tracking so low. What's the budget again?
I'm not sure they are going to make it through 5 more movies or whatever the heck they had planned
Correct: "400 characters that Fox owns"
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/deadpool-guardians-galaxy-2-were-because-a-mixup-947712
It might be 70s..A $90 million opening for Fantastic Beasts isn't terrible, but probably way less than WB expects/hopes.