I want a Ilvermony book or movie so bad.Should've just made a straight-up Grindelwald/Dumbledore movie or an Ilvermorny movie or something. No one wants to watch Eddie Redmayne for 2 hours.
I want a Ilvermony book or movie so bad.Should've just made a straight-up Grindelwald/Dumbledore movie or an Ilvermorny movie or something. No one wants to watch Eddie Redmayne for 2 hours.
There's that, but the Maximoff twins were Magneto's children until Marvel decided to wipe those dirty X-men connections off of them, and they remained co-owned.
Marvel really seemed to cut themselves a shitty deal over those Fantastic Four rights. Stan and Jack used that 100 issue FF run to create half of the Marvel Universe.
Marvel has the Celestials and The Eternals, anything beyond that is just gravy
True. But with the recent X-Men films: First Class, Days of Future Past and Apocalypse and Deadpool being generally viewed as good films, it's a step in the right direction, but yes you are correct, there is a lot of work to be done.
Though I think FOX realizes as such and are keen to do these characters justice as moving forward, their film slate will mostly be comprised of this in the near future (and they need everything to work well for them as they don't have the machine Disney has or the wealth of properties to work with):
- James Cameron projects (Avatar, Alita)
- Marvel/ Projects (X-Men, Deadpool, Fantastic Four)
- Ridley Scott projects
- FOX staples (Apes, Predator, Alien)
- FOX Animation (Blue Sky, Dreamworks)
I'm happy they kept the later Kirby stuff. But half of Marvel Cosmic is locked into Fox ownership. No Skrulls, no Shiar, no Badoon, no Galactus, no Surfer, no Negative Zone.
Maybe we'll get some Kymellians or Dire Wraiths at some point.
Marvel has the Celestials and The Eternals, anything beyond that is just gravy
I'm happy they kept the later Kirby stuff. But half of Marvel Cosmic is locked into Fox ownership. No Skrulls, no Shiar, no Badoon, no Galactus, no Surfer, no Negative Zone.
Maybe we'll get some Kymellians or Dire Wraiths at some point.
Fox definitely isn't hurting for IP. Universal is having a resurgence, but I would have placed them third after Disney and WB before that. They might still be third if they can manage the Marvel stuff better.
Yeah, and now with Dr Strange and the upcoming Thor movieopening up the doors for more space/mystical threats, Marvel has a lot of cosmic bad guys to play with who can be as dangerous and menacing as someone like Galactus.and Agents of Shield
I wanna see some elder gods.
IIRC marvel CAN use the skrulls, but chose not to for Avengers 1. Only super skrull (and almost certainly power skrull, his shitty knockoff) is off limits.
Fox definitely isn't hurting for IP. Universal is having a resurgence, but I would have placed them third after Disney and WB before that. They might still be third if they can manage the Marvel stuff better.
X-Men Apocalypse was considered a good film? News to me.
You will not disrepect Paibok THE POWER SKRULL!!!!
everyone disrespects the power skrull.
Based on the above, FOX have the broad rights to produce, distribute and exploit a theatrical motion picture based on the X-Men comic book universe. It does not state that the header "X-Men" must be included in the title in order to be counted as a feature film from the 1993 agreement.
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/220/289/2533881/
It's going to be a $600M performer for WB, J.K. Rowling gets richer, Universal Studios is happy as it keeps the Potterverse alive.
If not, FOX will try to tie up some of the Fantastic Four characters in future X-Men films so that their rights don't lapse. They are already doing that with X-Men and Deadpool, may as well complete the trifecta.
Marvel really seemed to cut themselves a shitty deal over those Fantastic Four rights. Stan and Jack used that 100 issue FF run to create half of the Marvel Universe.
X-Men Apocalypse was considered a good film? News to me.
If I see a kymellians on screen i will literally screen like a 8 year old girl and dare anyone to say anything to me about it.
They wouldn't exactly be out of place in Guardians. I hope that James Gunn continues to dig deep, even if it's only for easter egg stuff.
I don't think they can do that without Marvel's approval.
If the contract language is the same as the one established for the X-Men rights, they can. They need Marvel's approval if the character's powers are altered - hence why FOX licensed Ego the Living Planet for Guardians of the Galaxy 2 in order for Marvel to sign off on altering Negasonic Teenage Warhead's powers in Deadpool.
I don't know if you watch the cartoon, but they had Luntik(the prototype Lobo one), shocked the hell out of me. Almost as much as them playing "The boys are back in town" in a kid's cartoon.
I really want to be that guy that does the research for them on characters and shit to use.
As a matter of fact, even this latest spidey deal is crap for them, unless some info is not publicly known.
My nephew is really in love with Tony Stark and Miles Morales. I am trying to do better by himI don't watch cartoons anymore, but that's pretty cool. Maybe I'll convince my daughter to go through some of the better stuff on Netflix with me when she is a year or two older. She already likes Spider-man in his capacity of being on a ton of licensed crap. Batman is a no-go, since her older cousin was watching an episode of one of the newer series that featured Clayface, She thought it was the snow monster from Frozen (which she's terrified of). Now Batman is bad.
Disney bought back the merchandising rights. Given that Sony Pictures will have to die before giving up the franchise, I am sure they are fine with that, being able to use Spider-man in Avengers stuff, and whatever modest cut they are getting from Homecoming and its sequels for their production credit.
Cage downplays his Coppola name as much as he can though. And I think he's just starred in 400 shitty movies since 2005 because he just really likes working. Gotta respect the dude's ethic.
Did Marvel sign off on Darwin, cause they fucked up his powers
I am still mad
Doesn't he have insane alimony or paternity payments?
If the contract language is the same as the one established for the X-Men rights, they can. They need Marvel's approval if the character's powers are altered - hence why FOX licensed Ego the Living Planet for Guardians of the Galaxy 2 in order for Marvel to sign off on altering Negasonic Teenage Warhead's powers in Deadpool.
Disney bought back the merchandising rights. Given that Sony Pictures will have to die before giving up the franchise, I am sure they are fine with that, being able to use Spider-man in Avengers stuff, and whatever modest cut they are getting from Homecoming and its sequels for their production credit.
Disney bought back the merchandising rights. Given that Sony Pictures will have to die before giving up the franchise, I am sure they are fine with that, being able to use Spider-man in Avengers stuff, and whatever modest cut they are getting from Homecoming and its sequels for their production credit.
Nic Cage made your average NFL player look fiscally responsible when he was younger. Dude made over $100M in the 90s/early 2000s, but is now stuck taking whatever jobs he can get to pay his bills/debt.
Wasn't Nic Cage in serious tax trouble for a while? Like jail time tax trouble.
That's a big if. I wouldn't put it past Marvel to make such a shitty deal, but based on what I have seen, Fox can't cross FF over to XMen and vice versa without Marvel's approval.
The Mara girls' paternal line founded, co-owned, and adminstered the New York Giants for like 80 years. I doubt she's ever worried about paying rent.
I'm pretty sure Cage owns some weird European castles or something
I'm pretty sure Cage owns some weird European castles or something
I don't think they can do that without Marvel's approval.
So how big of a dent did Beasts put into Strange?
So how big of a dent did Beasts put into Strange?
When was the last time such similar movies appealing to pretty much the same audience have gone head to head?
57-59% drop from last weekend. Last Friday was inflated though.
So how big of a dent did Beasts put into Strange?
Is that good? Its not the 60% drop you talked about last week or is this just a thing in the first week?57-59% drop from last weekend. Last Friday was inflated though.
Is that good? Its not the 60% drop you talked about last week or is this just a thing in the first week?
Weekend Studio Estimates:
1) Fantastic Beasts- $75M
2) Doctor Strange- $17.6M - $181M total
3) Trolls - $17.5M - $116M
4) Arrival - $11.8M - $43M total
$572M for Doctor Strange worldwide. Chinese total is now past $100M.
Kids don't care about the Potterverse. Only 18% of the audience was <18
No kid characters in Fantastic Beast's marketing either, unlike Harry Potter.