I still don't get how they could just keep the baby like that. Assuming she didn't give it up because it doesn't say one way or the other. They're putting it in child services? Isn't that pretty much child theft and kidnapping if she was against it?
So you are saying it is not easier for somebody to commit espionage against the USA if they are in the US on a work visa versus if they are a citizen and granted a security clearance?
no. no, we shouldn't.We should probably have a serious discussion on repealing the "born on american soil gives you american citizenship" thing. Seems like people go to great lengths and dangers to try and give birth in places that can technically get them into this country.
How did she bring on labor? Did she use one of those hook things to break her waters as soon as she was comfortably inside US airspace?
If they grew up in a foreign country, the background check for the security clearance would reveal that. And since the parents of these babies don't have authorization to live in the US, they would usually grow up in a foreign country. The idea of such sleeper babies doesn't make much sense. You already have many foreign-born citizens that naturalize through legal reasons, and they already face tougher barriers to granting security clearances. Heck, I know third generation Chinese-Americans born and raised in the US, with parents that were not born in China/Taiwan that face difficulties getting security clearances because of some distant father's cousin uncle or something that works for a Chinese city's department of motor vehicles or something.So you are saying it is not easier for somebody to commit espionage against the USA if they are in the US on a work visa versus if they are a citizen and granted a security clearance?
think carefully about it for a second.
To the folks wondering why we kept the baby here; pretty sure putting a newborn on a flight isn't the safest idea. The child will be reunited with the mother as soon as it is safe to do so.
no. no, we shouldn't.
The baby's an American citizen. American citizens can't be deported. INS doesn't have the authority to let her take the baby.
I had a work friend who was in America on a work visa and had a kid while in the Bay Area. He lived in terror of our company failing, because he and his wife would be sent back to Canada, but their kid would stay behind and be put in foster care.
It's a totally screwed up system.
The real tragedy is that while we all understand that this was in her best interests for the baby, we find it better to talk about whether or not it is legal and not the fact that it sucks to live in other parts of the world.
And if your friends were jumping off a bridge, would you do it too?Why isn't it something worth discussing? Canada and the U.S. are unique in having birthright citizenship compared to similar countries.
Pack it up. I've heard it all.....
And if your friends were jumping off a bridge, would you do it too?
Why is the European way of dealing with citizenship any better than ours? Well, other than entrenching white power.
It's ours now.
you know taiwan isn't some hellscape right?
Or your work friend would just take the child with him....
Your friends scares make no sense...
We should probably have a serious discussion on repealing the "born on american soil gives you american citizenship" thing. Seems like people go to great lengths and dangers to try and give birth in places that can technically get them into this country.
Yeah that doesn't make any sense. The child is also Canadian through its parents. The Americans can't forcibly split the child from its parents.
Okay, here's a serious discussion of it: it's impossible to repeal, because it's the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. It's in there because it was passed after the Civil War to guarantee that never again would America deprive people born in America, or brought into America, of their civil and constitutional rights. So getting rid of it would be very difficult and also literally a stepping stone towards tyranny, which is bad.
The real problem with people trying to give birth on American soil is that they're doing it because they can't get into America and don't think their children will be able to either. Since every immigrant adds to the average wealth of every American by producing labor, this is a straightforward failure of our immigration system, and the correct solution is not to remove birthright citizenship, but to make it much easier to immigrate to America.
Prepare the baby catapult.
So aside from infiltrating the upper echelons of American government via espionage, or (some) Chinese people having an easier time going/sending their kids to college here, what are the actual dangers that this phenomenon presents?
What makes it unfair? Couldn't others also give birth in the US on tourist visas? The US tourist visa for Chinese citizens was recently extended to 10 years, making it "fairly" easy to do this now.Its an unfair abuse of a system that millions of others are doing properly.
What makes it unfair? Couldn't others also give birth in the US on tourist visas? The US tourist visa for Chinese citizens was recently extended to 10 years, making it "fairly" easy to do this now.
Okay, but they are not going to restrict the 10-year visa if there is a possibility that you are going to give birth in the 10-year period, which is absurd. I don't think they are waving bills around at the US embassy or consulate that grants these visas.Technically if you are near giving birth you are not even allowed to get a Visa in the first place but like most things in life wave some bills around and the restrictions suddenly get overlooked.
Its nice to live in a fantasy land. The whole point of birth tourism has nothing to do with contributing to America or any other delusion. Its game the system then go back home then in 18 years game the system again.
Its an unfair abuse of a system that millions of others are doing properly.
I can't help but feel that some people don't know how hard life can be just by being born in the wrong place at the wrong time, like say during an influenza epidemic- or at the base of an active volcano.
Or you know, in a first world country.
Heck I'm lucky to be alive, my grandparents along with my mother fled conscription and the destruction of the Yugoslav empire while on my fathers side they were escaping conscription and the London blitz. If things went any differently my grandfathers could of very well shot each other should they have stayed in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Our generation might be remembered as the 'well armed rich xenophobic' generation.
What benefit are you suggesting they get in 18 years?
Birth tourists are not fleeing war and pestilence. They are spending upwards of millions of dollars to get into the country in direct violation of laws and procedures.
You can be absolutely sympathetic to the plight of war refugees, general immigrants etc and still see this for what it is.
Taiwan is a nice place to live in. 1st world and all that.The real tragedy is that while we all understand that this was in her best interests for the baby, we find it better to talk about whether or not it is legal and not the fact that it sucks to live in other parts of the world.
Birth tourists are not fleeing war and pestilence. They are spending upwards of millions of dollars to get into the country in direct violation of laws and procedures.
You can be absolutely sympathetic to the plight of war refugees, general immigrants etc and still see this for what it is.
Having US citizenship makes being in the espionage business against the US a hell of a lot easier.
Yeah, I've heard of this sort of thing occurring often enough from the PRC and other places, but Taiwan? That's more than a little odd.
Could be several things, but wages have been stagnating in Taiwan for a while now. I think they are in many sectors higher in mainland China.
Could be some of their underdeveloped industries.Could be several things, but wages have been stagnating in Taiwan for a while now. I think they are in many sectors higher in mainland China.
And if your friends were jumping off a bridge, would you do it too?
Why is the European way of dealing with citizenship any better than ours? Well, other than entrenching white power.
Okay, here's a serious discussion of it: it's impossible to repeal, because it's the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. It's in there because it was passed after the Civil War to guarantee that never again would America deprive people born in America, or brought into America, of their civil and constitutional rights. So getting rid of it would be very difficult and also literally a stepping stone towards tyranny, which is bad.
I still don't get how they could just keep the baby like that. Assuming she didn't give it up because it doesn't say one way or the other. They're putting it in child services? Isn't that pretty much child theft and kidnapping if she was against it?