Would you prefer Switch be higher priced with more power, or cheaper with less power?

Honestly, as cheap as possible.

I'd be happy with WiiU graphics/performance (mabye limiting resolution or frame rate in portable mode, assuming the rumours about the base giving extra power are true)

Outside of a niche I don't see the market for a super expensive Nintendo console


I think it's going to be underpowered and slightly overpriced to be honest
 
Cheaper, because I don't want a device tailored to me as a hardcore niche consumer that will struggle to find mainstream adoption.

I want this thing to sell and for Nintendo to do well.
 
Honestly, as cheap as possible.

I'd be happy with WiiU graphics/performance (mabye limiting resolution or frame rate in portable mode, assuming the rumours about the base giving extra power are true)

Outside of a niche I don't see the market for a super expensive Nintendo console

Agreed. The cheapness and portability is going to set them apart from PS4/XBO. If Nintendo tried to directly compete the console would bomb miserably. Those systems already have established libraries, online users, ecosystems, etc. It would be suicide to try and mimic them especially when Sony and MS are about to enter a spec arms race as well.

Nintendo pivoting to this hybrid is a brilliant move and it will pay off imo.
 
Anything that keeps the price under 300 atleast, wouldn't mind at all if it was even 200 if the footage we saw in the trailer is what we would get with it. I built a PC with 1000 euros so that covers my need for graphical fidelity and 60 fps gaming. I'd like a cheap console to play exclusives not on PC and taking the machine on the go is really big positive. So cheaper option for me please!
 
I don’t care if the Switch gets games with worse graphics than the PS4 or XOne, but I do care about still getting them. I need a console that can receive the same games as the competition, even if worse graphics, since portability can be a nice trade-off.

My hope is that Switch is flexible enough to receive ports from the same games that will come out on PS4 and XOne.
 
Higher and better. I'd pay 30% more for 30 more fps, or whatnot. Put a Turbo button on the dock.

I expect Nintendo to go for a lower entry point for maximized market penetration and aim to profit from hardware sales as soon as possible.
It'd be interesting if they went the Scorpro route right out of the gate, but if there are multiple SKU's I reckon they'll be the standard.
 
portable only
199 - upgraded wiiu

with base
249 - if passive - same as portable
299 - active base (approaching xo)
349 - active base (at/approaching ps4)
 
I would prefer Switch to be successful so it will be supported with relevant games more than 3 years. I think the best way to achieve that is to be cheap enough. I don't understand where the more power will come from, we know it's powered by Tegra? SCD? I would prefer that to be optional.
 
Cheaper. Nintendo has for a very long time not been at the vanguard of power under the hood and yet they still manage to pump put games of incredible quality and playability.

Less money spent on the barrier to entry also means more money to spend on games. You know, the reason the hardware exists.
 
Melius abundare quam deficere.

You can always find money later or buy a second hand switch from the internet, you can't buy more graphics.
 
Lower end at low price, because otherwise I fear it will tank and we will see release schedules similar to the WiiU with a severe lack of third party support.

(I think the quality standard in terms of tech needs to be >WiiU and therefore development time won't be like 3DS titles anymore).
 
299 would be a great price...but if it needs to be 349 or 399 even to ensure we have a console powerful enough to play the multiplats with the portability, I'm in.
 
You can always find money later or buy a second hand switch from the internet, you can't buy more graphics.

That would assume there will be enough people buying it first hand. And buying a lot of games. In order to, you know, keep getting games by the time you buy it second hand.
 
Cheap enough that it's a success, and they support it.

I've seen nothing to indicate that there's a viable market for an expensive powerful Nintendo console. It's a misnomer that power is the major hurdle to third party support too.

On a side note, I've been replaying Mario Galaxy with my nephew, and it holds up remarkably well, really emphasising what they can do with less. Nintendo just need enough power to allow for clean image quality and some interesting gameplay hooks. Their art design does the rest.
 
I'd pay a lot for it, but I think the prices in USA will be as follows:

Standalone NS (just the tablet and side controllers): 299$
Launch pack: NS + dock + Joy-Con central unit + Zelda BotW: 349$
Standalone dock: 49$
Pro Controller: 49$

So the product is 299$, but you end up happily paying 399$ for the pack and the Pro controller.
 
i'd rather it be cheaper.

i mean look at the current market, both PS4 and Xbox One were supposed to be the powerhouse systems on release, yet performance issues on them didn't exactly disappear. plus there is another version of those systems coming out, "even more powerful", and it looks to have those same issues.

power seems kind of a waste to me imo. like chasing a dragon that will never be caught.

the games are all that matters. Mario Kart 8 might run on a less powerful system but it is way more impressive to me.
 
I'd pay a lot for it, but I think the prices in USA will be as follows:

Standalone NS (just the tablet and side controllers): 299$
Launch pack: NS + dock + Joy-Con central unit + Zelda BotW: 349$
Standalone dock: 49$
Pro Controller: 49$

So the product is 299$, but you end up happily paying 399$ for the pack and the Pro controller.

Nintendo Switch standalone is an aberration. That's Nintendo Still or something.
 
Nintendo Switch standalone is an aberration. That's Nintendo Still or something.

Well, it has to happen if your two sons want a Nintendo Switch but you only have one TV at home.

Remember Nintendo is the same company that doesn't include a charger with your 3DS just in case you already have one.
 
Well, it has to happen if your two sons want a Nintendo Switch but you only have one TV at home.

Remember Nintendo is the same company that doesn't include a charger with your 3DS just in case you already have one.

Not at launch if they learned anything from Wii U failure. One product, consistent and simple communication.
 
Higher price and power. I want Zelda NS to be a vast upgrade over Zelda U, which at this point is looking uncertain. If what they showed is actually the NS version, there is basically no upgrade at all.

On the other hand, I'll mainly buy this thing for Nintendo games, so it'd be nice if it's cheap. The Wii U costs as much as a PS4, which is ridiculous and not remotely worth it. I might have bought one at like $150 or something, but they just won't drop the price.
 
Higher price with more power. I have concerns about this. I know they like to make profit on hw and if they sell for too high a price, it could end up stalled in sales. That said, for me, it needs to be powerful to maintain my excitement.

Overall, I just need to see more. I've been positive I'd preorder NX for ages, then it arrives as Switch and I find myself really unsure. I need to know if it supports multiple tablets per base, what the power is like, what the battery life is, and what's going on with the launch/first year library.
 
I can't believe people are content with low power in 2017. It should be capable of 1080p (or thereabouts) in docked mode.
 
I can't believe people are content with low power in 2017. It should be capable of 1080p (or thereabouts) in docked mode.

Wii U was capable of 1080p for certain games (Smash, Wind Waker HD, Twilight Princess) and it was a low-spec machine.

I don't see why the Switch, which is rumored to be 3x as powerful (give or take) wouldn't be capable of also having a few 1080p native titles when docked.

I don't think hitting 1080p for all titles is as important as having a good introductory family-friendly price that attracts an audience. A higher audience will yield a lot more interesting software (especially from Japanese third parties) than more power at this point. Plus, the architecture is modern enough to allow for 3rd party AAA ports to be scaled down into portable versions for a 720p screen (again, only if the audience is there).

This isn't another Wii U or 3DS situation. You can come in at the low end of the power spectrum and still have hardware that all major devs will be familiar with and have the skillset to support (again, only if the audience is there).

Pricing the Switch for under $300 (hopefully $250) is absolutely essential. This will be competing with the Xbox One S and the PS4 Slim which are already priced around there.
 
Cheaper. Less power.

I am primarily a PC gamer and this will be my side console. I dont wanna spend more than 200 USD on it. I am willing to wait a year or two if its more than that.
 
Cheaper, less power, more battery life, Nintendo is awesome and they're able to create wonderful experience and artistic graphics without needing much power. I already have a Windows 10 gaming PC for when i want my jaw dropping for realistic graphics and special effects

PS:Being a mobile device Switch is already powerful, i mean it could actually be possible to have a faster mobile hardware, though battery would last 1 hours then
 
I'd pay a lot for it, but I think the prices in USA will be as follows:

Standalone NS (just the tablet and side controllers): 299$
Launch pack: NS + dock + Joy-Con central unit + Zelda BotW: 349$
Standalone dock: 49$
Pro Controller: 49$

So the product is 299$, but you end up happily paying 399$ for the pack and the Pro controller.

Hasn't Nintendo said they are positioning this as a home console primarily? If so I cant see them selling this in ANY configuration without the dock.
 
It doesn't need to be the graphical quality of Xbone. But it must have the games.

Playing Overwatch, Destiny 2, the next Bethesda game will all be important. Sports games WILL ALSO BE IMPORTANT. FFVII remake and RE 2 Remake will also be important.


They can't just have Nintendo and niche Vita games. It won't sell. Its probably a $299 with dock if it can play Xbone ports. If it can't play Xbone ports than it needs to be $199 to $250 at max.
 
$299 is probably the absolute highest the price can be if they want it to be successful, so whatever amount of power that gets me.

This was my thought as soon as I saw it. I want the price and power to be whatever it'll take to sell enough of these things to attract some good and unique games. $299 was the number that came to my mind.
 
This is a double edged sword, personally would love to have a more powerful console at a higher price, but i know that if it was a premium product it is pretty much dead on arrival. If it is less powerful the 3rd party support will be minimal. All in all i really want Switch to do well but not sure it will just because it's really needs to find the perfect balance.
 
I could not care less about portability, so higher price and more power. Considering what Nintendo's artists have been able to do with hardware thats a half generation behind, Id love to see Zelda and Mario on beefy hardware pushing them.
 
Either higher priced
Or
A tiered pricing model:
1. Enthusiast SKU - More power than what's rumored, more focused on playing at home.

Basically I'd like the console base to be very powerful. At least powerful enough to fall somewhere between the PS4 and Pro.

2. Portable/affordable SKU - less power, focused on portability.
The base for this SKU basically just serves as a charging/TV out/USB hub.

I know that's not gonna happen but I'd love it.
 
Enough power to avoid issues with third party content like the wii u did. Otherwise, it does not matter, power is not the selling point of theSwitch
 
While id personally be fine with a more premium device, it would likely have to be cheaper to find the mainstream adoption it needs for software support.
 
Do you anticipate a future where the Switch is someone's second (or third) dedicated gaming device? Lower price is preferred.

Do you anticipate a future where the Switch is the only hardware people will buy? Good luck, but high price works here.
 
I would always want more power but I would leave it as is vs cheaper and less power.

I honestly think the multi platform 3rd party environment is gone from Nintendo consoles.

Ecosystems. Wee see it play out in mobile phones. I dont think Madden, NBA 2K, GTA, etc will ever be a big seller on Nintendo consoles. Or big enough that 3rd parties will care about releasing future games on their system.

Would be wild seeing GTA on a Nintendo home console again tho.
 
Definitely has to be lower-priced. PS4/X1 will have a 3.5 year headstart, and even PS4 Pro will beat it out of the gate with X1.5 on its heels, so for a lot of people this will be a 2nd console. Most people who buy it will be doing it for a) Nintendo exclusives and b) Taking current gen games on the go, so for it to succeed it's gotta be priced for that market.

Wii U started at $350 and it's barely gone down from there, but it was essentially two major pieces of hardware in one box. By combining those into one unit with the Switch, that's a nice chunk of change shaved off production costs.

Next most important is power for the sake of keeping the barriers to third party ports as low as possible. We don't know the final specs, but we've heard it's about where the X1 is, probably a little under that, and that should be plenty for keeping up with third party ports through the end of the gen.

Last is battery life. Though portability is probably the biggest factor that sets Switch apart from the competition, it needs to be a viable platform first and it can't do that if it's too expensive for people to buy or if it's too weak for third parties to support. It'll just be a repeat of the Wii U. 3 hours is exactly what I expected, and not even the worst we've had with other systems that were handheld-only. Nintendo has to leverage it against power and I think their priorities are in the right order here.

That said, it needs to aim for $250. Especially with the 4K consoles out at $400 and presumably even more for X1.5, $250 or less will be the sweet spot.
 
I wonder how much they'll limit game size because of the storage limitations that the memory card will have. I mean, you'd only be able to fit one maybe two modern PS4 AAA games on a 64 gb cart.
 
I like most people HERE would vote for more power, higher price. However, I recognize the other option might be the best way for Nintendo to go. Having at least crappy ports of the big 3rd party games is all I ask for, honestly.
 
Top Bottom