HeisenbergLannister
Member
So many females are getting Seth nudes with him only wearing the title right now.
Never, cause reigns was always the guy.Stolen from another board, but dead on
So, when do we all want to admit that Rollins has actually been the chosen one the entire time; and Reigns was a red herring? Because looking back, anyone who didn't read the dirtsheets and immediately believe them would have thought Rollins was the chosen one (especially when you think they had Rollins with Jon Stewart, and not Reigns...or that Rollins was being protected through feuds and having feuds with good opponents unlike Reigns).
Was at a WM party with friends, and his mother (who watched in the attitude era but picked it up again recently) was confused as to why they thought Roman Reigns was the chosen one; she's thought Rollins was the chosen one.
Stolen from another board, but dead on
So, when do we all want to admit that Rollins has actually been the chosen one the entire time; and Reigns was a red herring? Because looking back, anyone who didn't read the dirtsheets and immediately believe them would have thought Rollins was the chosen one (especially when you think they had Rollins with Jon Stewart, and not Reigns...or that Rollins was being protected through feuds and having feuds with good opponents unlike Reigns).
Was at a WM party with friends, and his mother (who watched in the attitude era but picked it up again recently) was confused as to why they thought Roman Reigns was the chosen one; she's thought Rollins was the chosen one.
I counted 3; F5s, German Suplexes, and Slaps.
After the disaster that was RR, I was certain Seth was winning tonight based on how he was being treated.Stolen from another board, but dead on
So, when do we all want to admit that Rollins has actually been the chosen one the entire time; and Reigns was a red herring? Because looking back, anyone who didn't read the dirtsheets and immediately believe them would have thought Rollins was the chosen one (especially when you think they had Rollins with Jon Stewart, and not Reigns...or that Rollins was being protected through feuds and having feuds with good opponents unlike Reigns).
Was at a WM party with friends, and his mother (who watched in the attitude era but picked it up again recently) was confused as to why they thought Roman Reigns was the chosen one; she's thought Rollins was the chosen one.
Because wrestling isn't real?Stolen from another board, but dead on
So, when do we all want to admit that Rollins has actually been the chosen one the entire time; and Reigns was a red herring? Because looking back, anyone who didn't read the dirtsheets and immediately believe them would have thought Rollins was the chosen one (especially when you think they had Rollins with Jon Stewart, and not Reigns...or that Rollins was being protected through feuds and having feuds with good opponents unlike Reigns).
Was at a WM party with friends, and his mother (who watched in the attitude era but picked it up again recently) was confused as to why they thought Roman Reigns was the chosen one; she's thought Rollins was the chosen one.
So here's my question... did Taker need to lose to Brock last year in hindsight?
Brock still has that aura about him, but it wasn't used to put over someone new this year
Because wrestling isn't real?
The idea that wwe was doing a year long work is the smarkest thing I have ever.
We're in OT so awhile.
So here's my question... did Taker need to lose to Brock last year in hindsight?
Brock still has that aura about him, but it wasn't used to put over someone new this year
So, when do we all want to admit that Rollins has actually been the chosen one the entire time; and Reigns was a red herring? Because looking back, anyone who didn't read the dirtsheets and immediately believe them would have thought Rollins was the chosen one (especially when you think they had Rollins with Jon Stewart, and not Reigns...or that Rollins was being protected through feuds and having feuds with good opponents unlike Reigns).
He was? It didn't sound like it.Mania was incredibly fun. Despite the fact that I wasnt a fan of the main event's booking, there was an undeniable big event feel. I think the match was fun (loved Reigns' chuckle while getting his ass beat), though I would have appreciated more moves from both Lesnar and Reigns. Ending was also great.
BTW, people thinking WWE is off the Reigns train are delusional. I spent four days at Axxess. The motherfucker is insanely popular. He's being perfectly groomed to be the new Cena.
So, when do we all want to admit that Rollins has actually been the chosen one the entire time; and Reigns was a red herring? Because looking back, anyone who didn't read the dirtsheets and immediately believe them would have thought Rollins was the chosen one (especially when you think they had Rollins with Jon Stewart, and not Reigns...or that Rollins was being protected through feuds and having feuds with good opponents unlike Reigns).
There's people here who are insistent that WWE just casually gave Rollins MITB for no reason at all. Because they want to pretend they didn't get fooled. It's ok to get worked.
This is all according to keikaku.
So here's my question... did Taker need to lose to Brock last year in hindsight?
Brock still has that aura about him, but it wasn't used to put over someone new this year
Triple H vs Sting, ok, here's the thing, WHAT THE FUCK DID YOU GUYS EXPECTED, UH? It was going to be a boring, slow, gassed out match. We knew it, and it looks that they knew it. nWo vs DX was a smart move to get reactions, and not have an standard match. HHH now officialy has buried the entire WCW guys lol
Wyatt/Taker blew. Why even have it if Bray was gonna lose? Why are you so behind someone in terms of marketing yet ALWAYS have him lose big matches?
It doesn't matter what they're doing with Rollins. The end game is still to get the belt on Reigns. Which means Reigns is the chosen one.How does this reply even make sense
Mania was incredibly fun. Despite the fact that I wasnt a fan of the main event's booking, there was an undeniable big event feel. I think the match was fun (loved Reigns' chuckle while getting his ass beat), though I would have appreciated more moves from both Lesnar and Reigns. Ending was also great.
BTW, people thinking WWE is off the Reigns train are delusional. I spent four days at Axxess. The motherfucker is insanely popular. He's being perfectly groomed to be the new Cena.
I think the fact that he still has that aura is enough. He'll be back and hopefully be facing Daniel Bryan.
Well guess more in the sense that he didn't need to beat Taker to have that aura
I think just being a suplex machine has done wonders for him
you'd think so huh
It doesn't matter what they're doing with Rollins. The end game is still to get the belt on Reigns. Which means Reigns is the chosen one.
Mania was incredibly fun. Despite the fact that I wasnt a fan of the main event's booking, there was an undeniable big event feel. I think the match was fun (loved Reigns' chuckle while getting his ass beat), though I would have appreciated more moves from both Lesnar and Reigns. Ending was also great.
BTW, people thinking WWE is off the Reigns train are delusional. I spent four days at Axxess. The motherfucker is insanely popular. He's being perfectly groomed to be the new Cena.
He is basically one of if not the most talented guy on the roster.I don't know shit about current wrestling other than the casual bitching and stories linked by gaming-industry people on Twitter, but I watch Wrestlemania every year with some buds who are all ex-fans like m (Attitude Era shit).
Was this guy stealing the title a good thing? I don't know a single thing about him, all I know is fans hate Reigns because he's not Daniel Bryan and the guy is being shoved down fans throats as a face yet nobody likes the guy.
Stolen from another board, but dead on
So, when do we all want to admit that Rollins has actually been the chosen one the entire time; and Reigns was a red herring? Because looking back, anyone who didn't read the dirtsheets and immediately believe them would have thought Rollins was the chosen one (especially when you think they had Rollins with Jon Stewart, and not Reigns...or that Rollins was being protected through feuds and having feuds with good opponents unlike Reigns).
Was at a WM party with friends, and his mother (who watched in the attitude era but picked it up again recently) was confused as to why they thought Roman Reigns was the chosen one; she's thought Rollins was the chosen one.
The idea that wwe was doing a year long work is the smarkest thing I have ever heard.
So here's my question... did Taker need to lose to Brock last year in hindsight?
Brock still has that aura about him, but it wasn't used to put over someone new this year
Was at a WM party with friends, and his mother (who watched in the attitude era but picked it up again recently) was confused as to why they thought Roman Reigns was the chosen one; she's thought Rollins was the chosen one.
Rollins has always been one of the guys WWE believes is a megastar in waiting. Reigns clearly is seen that way too. It's been obvious since the Shield split. It's not a zero sum game that there's One Guy.
Reigns was chosen 2 to 3 years ago to be next guy. Thats why the shield was even formed to protect Reigns as he learned to actually wrestle and talk which he hasn't yet. Reigns got to skip NXT after two matches. If your trying to say that WWE planned this two years ago I call bullshit because they can't even plan what they are going to do next week
He was? It didn't sound like it.
Now that Bryan/Cena have the IC/US titles can we please stop having the champion lose EVERY non-championship match? One of my biggest pet peeves.
Also, anyone who wants to push the Rollins as chosen one angle needs to explain why just two weeks ago the WWE made him look like a complete chump when Orton lied to his face and then tortured Seth for 15 straight minutes to end the show.
I'm guessing original plan was Roman beats Brock taking both the streak and title away from him, but loses to Rollins to set up that feud while Brock goes away to UFC.
With his re-signing they had to protect him and the streak for the foreseeable future so we got what happened tonight. Brock still looks crazy unbeatable, Rollins gets the title. Only loose end is Roman looks ridiculously weak which I'm okay with.
So here's my question... did Taker need to lose to Brock last year in hindsight?
Brock still has that aura about him, but it wasn't used to put over someone new this year
Taker winning this year subtly reinforces that Brock winning IS a big deal - that it's more about Brock's strength to win as opposed to Taker's age.
Also, anyone who wants to push the Rollins as chosen one angle needs to explain why just two weeks ago the WWE made him look like a complete chump when Orton lied to his face and then tortured Seth for 15 straight minutes to end the show.
As far as I know they're both married with children - however that isn't a definitive indictment of their sexuality, which I honestly don't care which way they swing. It's not my business.