Did that actually happen? I feel like I would have noticed that.
Yeah that happened. I did a double take since I didn't know what was going on when I saw that.
Did that actually happen? I feel like I would have noticed that.
I would have preferred Sting not come back for this. He was right all along.
Huh. I must have been really bored at that point. I don't know how I could have missed something like that.Yeah that happened. I did a double take since I didn't know what was going on when I saw that.
Ah, smarks rationalizing what people are thinking based on how they're walking to the ring never gets old.
I've never disliked Reigns. I was happy that WWE was finally putting a young guy with a lot of potential front and center in their biggest show, but just felt that Reigns was a bit underdeveloped in some key areas.New resepct for Roman I hope you guys have a little bit more for him too.
I would have preferred Sting not come back for this. He was right all along.
He likely got paid a shit load of money for minimal work.This is what is really dumb about it all.
If Sting was too disgusted by WWE's portrayal of WCW guys, why'd he come back at all, especially when he's old as fuck? It makes no sense.
I would hope, and think, that there will be more to all of this than what we saw last night, but it is the WWE, soooo....This is what is really dumb about it all.
If Sting was too disgusted by WWE's portrayal of WCW guys, why'd he come back at all, especially when he's old as fuck? It makes no sense.
Did that actually happen? I feel like I would have noticed that.
Hi WrassleGAF,
What's the difference between a MARK and a SMARK?
Thank you for your time.
Yes it did. Had to do a double take last night. Also, what time is Rusev's career's wake and graveside service tonight?
A mark gets caught up thinking the show is real. A smark prides themselves on not being marks, but think they know the inner workings of the show well enough that they can tell what's scripted or not. They can be just as easily manipulated as "casual marks." Everyone is a mark honestly.Hi WrassleGAF,
What's the difference between a MARK and a SMARK?
Thank you for your time.
This"We Win Again" -- JBL
Yeah, pretty much says it all.
As I said over at the WM 31 post on the Off Topic. My problem with that match was the illogical thinking behind the aftermath and the hand shake.
Wasn't Sting cutting a promo on HHH's heel tactics scathing him for how he had manipulated his way to the top not a week before this match? So HHH uses heel tactics to win the match and then Sting shakes his hand afterwards like it all meant nothing?
Then an hour later, HHH is out there verbally burying him with the whole "We're the Authority and we always win" shtick.
The problem for me is that none of this makes sense within the context of the story they were building to begin with. The story was never about WCW vs. WWE, it was about Sting standing up to HHH's corruption. Once they started introducing the WCW element, I knew that Sting was most likely destined to be buried. Like everything, they start off with a good idea and then they somehow manage to screw it up.
This was burial 101. They gloated with the whole "we won" bit. Hell, the only way that the authority got their just desserts was at the hands of their own home grown talent (and Rousey)
I've seen people try to defend this, but the whole thing just reeked of burying for the sake of burying. Can't say I was too surprised either. As soon as they started playing up the whole WCW part of it, I just knew there was no way they were letting someone attached with WCW stigma go over at Mania.
So I can't say I was too surprised, I honestly was expecting this...
And this!No, the real problem with Sting/HHH was the commentary constantly shitting on WCW like it was 2001 all over again.
Exactly! Don't know what Sting was thinking.I would have preferred Sting not come back for this. He was right all along.
Mark = your casual wrestling fan who gets excited about everything WWE wants you to get excited about
Smark = your "smart" wrestling fan who follows backstage news and complains and can still get excited about certain things when WWE wants you to be excited
I would have preferred Sting not come back for this. He was right all along.
Yes it did. Had to do a double take last night. Also, what time is Rusev's career's wake and graveside service tonight?
This is what is really dumb about it all.
If Sting was too disgusted by WWE's portrayal of WCW guys, why'd he come back at all, especially when he's old as fuck? It makes no sense.
Can we get Axel vs Hulk next year? That dude is hilarious, getting crowdsurfed out the battle royal had me in tears.
I don't understand what they were going for during the Sting/HHH match. I just don't understand.
Can someone compile a list of the last twenty matches HHH has wrestled, and how many he's won? I guess the biggest positive will always be that he wasn't given the streak, and Lesnar was. Thank God for that.
Somehow I feel like HHH will feel like he's the best one to retire the Undertaker, though.
I never once fantasized about a match between HHH and Sting. What a waste.
Nostalgia match. That and Vince can't have a WCW guy beat a WWE guy. Standard HHH backstage politics really.
I don't know about his last 20 matches, but he's basically like 50/50 in his last 3-4 years of matches.
Maybe I'm just still hurt that he beat Brock and made Brock look weak for a bit.
just re-watching god the camera work is terrible in the wwe like close up after close up after close up with a slow zoom out, you miss all the good things. ex 1. seth rollins going for 2nd curbstomp on brock, brock lifts him up, zoom in on brock and his torso and you just see reigns going for the spear a second after, your barely see it, right after that seth going for curbstomp on regins why the fuck do you zoom in on seths upper chest and face, then cut full screen right after he hits it.....wtf are they thinking