• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

WrestleMania |OT| Look at the adjective,

Status
Not open for further replies.

MaulerX

Member
I've seen pensioners on Bum Fights, I don't need to see it again. Sting could barley do a scorpion death lock and if Taker was anymore sluggish, he would have actually been crawling around in goo.



As someone who has followed Stings career from the Jim Crockett days, I can tell you that when a match is not booked for Stings opponent to submit, Sting NEVER locked the Scorpion fully and NEVER fully sat down on it. It's just a way to give his opponent wiggle room to move around and reach the ropes.
 

IconGrist

Member
No, the real problem with Sting/HHH was the commentary constantly shitting on WCW like it was 2001 all over again.

The commentary was ruining a lot of things last night to such a point I cut the volume almost all the way down. I didn't even know Rollins was coming down until they cut to him entering the arena.
 
One of the biggest what ifs of this generation will be "what if Brock Lesnar never left WWE". I wonder whether Cena / Lesnar becomes Austin / Rock. Bret / Shawn, etc.
Lesnar's stint in the UFC definitely gave him a credibility that no other superstar outside of Kurt Angle has touched. Hard to say exactly how things would be different had he never left, but I'm glad it worked out the way it did. A dominant champion who lurks in the shadows and sadistically chews up elite superstars is one hell of a novelty. He's so damn over he's not even a face or a heel anymore. He's a spectacle. I can't think of anyone else in the history of the business who could have pulled that off outside of a prime Undertaker.
 

Khrno

Member
If Daniel Bryan hadn't been hit with multiple pedigrees, wrestled two matches in a night, and hit with an RKO / Batista Bomb combo onto the announce table, and then sprung up off a gurney and took out both Orton and Batista..I feel like there might be more to this complaint.

WWE always book their top faces like Superman; I don't think they know how to do it otherwise.

On one hand it is the super guy, on the other hand it is pretty much every Rocky fight.
He gets his ass beat round after round, wearing the opponent down until he gets his opening and the oppoent slows and then he opens up and lays into him.

But they did paint him that way. It wasn't out of character or anything. And it's not exactly like this is a problem specific to Reigns. Brock dominated Rollins and Cena with a "broken rib" just two months ago. That's basically Cena's entire gimmick.

I mean I get why that's frustrating or at least could be frustrating for realism's sake but it added a little bit to Roman's character here. He saw Brock was hurt and stunned and went at him. The title was on the line, Roman's reputation is on the line. From a storytelling perspective I was more than fine with that playing out in that way.

My main problem is not the come back, but how little do finishers mean nowadays. They should make the finishers big deals, but people now kick out of them left and right.

Since Cybit brought Bryan into the conversation, his finisher (the running knee) was protected for year and a half until Reigns kicked out of it, that was a huge deal.

But going on three Lesnar matches, it took three F5s to beat Taker, I can't remember how many did Cena take on Summerslam but it was more than one since he did one at the beginning of the match, and Reigns took four F5s last night, the last one wasn't a pin since Lesnar was actually selling and then Rollins came in.

So yeah, the finishers need to become a bigger deal again, Reigns kicking out of Bryan's running knee impressed me for how it had been protected as devastating move, but the F5 is something that isn't protected and it's a shame. Same goes for every finisher of every guy in the company, even if they are jobbers.

My solution for that would be, counter the finisher, perfect example with Reigns and Bryan, instead of kicking out twice of the knee, Reigns countered with a spear and got the pin and another example from last night, Orton countered the Curb Stomp into an RKO and won.

So if a finishing move doesn't hit, it is more "believable" that way in my opinion. If no one kicks out of a F5, a Curb Stomp, an RKO, an AA, a ZigZag, etc, next time someone actually does it'll be a huge deal for that guy who didn't get pin with it and turned the match around.

Going back to last night's match, had Reigns only kicked out of one F5, the one at the beginning, and then the second F5 would have been the one prior to Rollins entrance which Lesnar didn't get to do the cover, it would have been less bullshit.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
My main problem is not the come back, but how little do finishers mean nowadays. They should make the finishers big deals, but people now kick out of them left and right.

Since Cybit brought Bryan into the conversation, his finisher (the running knee) was protected for year and a half until Reigns kicked out of it, that was a huge deal.

But going on three Lesnar matches, it took three F5s to beat Taker, I can't remember how many did Cena take on Summerslam but it was more than one since he did one at the beginning of the match, and Reigns took four F5s last night, the last one wasn't a pin since Lesnar was actually selling and then Rollins came in.

So yeah, the finishers need to become a bigger deal again, Reigns kicking out of Bryan's running knee impressed me for how it had been protected as devastating move, but the F5 is something that isn't protected and it's a shame. Same goes for every finisher of every guy in the company, even if they are jobbers.

My solution for that would be, counter the finisher, perfect example with Reigns and Bryan, instead of kicking out twice of the knee, Reigns countered with a spear and got the pin and another example from last night, Orton countered the Curb Stomp into an RKO and won.

So if a finishing move doesn't hit, it is more "believable" that way in my opinion. If no one kicks out of a F5, a Curb Stomp, an RKO, an AA, a ZigZag, etc, next time someone actually does it'll be a huge deal for that guy who didn't get pin with it and turned the match around.

Going back to last night's match, had Reigns only kicked out of one F5, the one at the beginning, and then the second F5 would have been the one prior to Rollins entrance which Lesnar didn't get to do the cover, it would have been less bullshit.

I do like Brock's counter of generally "pick the guy out of the air and F5 his ass". When he caught Seth, I legitimately thought he was going to destroy Seth and pin him and walk out champion. I think Lesnar is one of the few people who has been built up to kick out of finishers and not make it seems too over the top; the Superman Punch crescendo was something to behold, as Reigns kept laying into him but couldn't get him to drop. You can just see like the boss's health bar slowly dropping on each hit with Lesnar.
 
To me Reigns just comes off as an asshole, both on the mic and in the ring. Outside of the ring too, from what I've seen/heard. And he doesn't have the talent to outright be an asshole, if you ask me. I'm surprised to hear as much support from him as he has gotten. He's only had two good matches and he was carried in both scenario, if you ask me.
 

RBH

Member
XLc3rrD.png


48z2YjP.png



https://www.reddit.com/r/SquaredCir...ay_wyatt_injured_preparing_for_match_against/

One good thing about MetsFan4Ever not coming though (again) is that more and more people can finally put this fool out to pasture and ignore him. :)
 

BFIB

Member
To me Reigns just comes off as an asshole, both on the mic and in the ring. Outside of the ring too, from what I've seen/heard. And he doesn't have the talent to outright be an asshole, if you ask me. I'm surprised to hear as much support from him as he has gotten. He's only had two good matches and he was carried in both scenario, if you ask me.

Him shoving the fan out of the way last night when he first came out was priceless. I'm sure Vince screamed to cut the camera shot which immediately happened afterward.
 

norm9

Member
I dug the Triple H entrance. I got the feeling he didn't bother telling Sting about the movie cross promotion as he had a real what the fuck expression going on. Match was entertaining but fuck Triple H burying the guy that was supposed to be unstoppable and that weird handshake thing at the end.
 

IconGrist

Member
My main problem is not the come back, but how little do finishers mean nowadays. They should make the finishers big deals, but people now kick out of them left and right.

Since Cybit brought Bryan into the conversation, his finisher (the running knee) was protected for year and a half until Reigns kicked out of it, that was a huge deal.

But going on three Lesnar matches, it took three F5s to beat Taker, I can't remember how many did Cena take on Summerslam but it was more than one since he did one at the beginning of the match, and Reigns took four F5s last night, the last one wasn't a pin since Lesnar was actually selling and then Rollins came in.

So yeah, the finishers need to become a bigger deal again, Reigns kicking out of Bryan's running knee impressed me for how it had been protected as devastating move, but the F5 is something that isn't protected and it's a shame. Same goes for every finisher of every guy in the company, even if they are jobbers.

My solution for that would be, counter the finisher, perfect example with Reigns and Bryan, instead of kicking out twice of the knee, Reigns countered with a spear and got the pin and another example from last night, Orton countered the Curb Stomp into an RKO and won.

So if a finishing move doesn't hit, it is more "believable" that way in my opinion. If no one kicks out of a F5, a Curb Stomp, an RKO, an AA, a ZigZag, etc, next time someone actually does it'll be a huge deal for that guy who didn't get pin with it and turned the match around.

Going back to last night's match, had Reigns only kicked out of one F5, the one at the beginning, and then the second F5 would have been the one prior to Rollins entrance which Lesnar didn't get to do the cover, it would have been less bullshit.

I can't remember where that started. I want to say WM15 when Austin/Rock kicked out of each others finishers which I believe had not been done before. I could be wrong though but I agree. Finishers need to be protected.

However, say finishers were well protected, I still think last night should have played out the exact same way. To my earlier point I believe Roman kicking out was merely to aggravate Brock more than anything and had finishers be as protected as you describe that would have been a huge deal for Roman. It already was but it would have been on a whole other level.

To your point, another thing that bothers me is some superstars are absolutely terrible at selling a pinfall. The amount of times I see a superstar looking up at the ref waiting on the 3 count to happen so they can leave really irritates the hell out of me.

Him shoving the fan out of the way last night when he first came out was priceless. I'm sure Vince screamed to cut the camera shot which immediately happened afterward.

To be fair, that fan was a total dick for getting in his way like that. If you look again the security behind Roman continued to yell at the guy and shove him back. The fan didn't seem very bothered with it though.
 

Khrno

Member
I do like Brock's counter of generally "pick the guy out of the air and F5 his ass". When he caught Seth, I legitimately thought he was going to destroy Seth and pin him and walk out champion. I think Lesnar is one of the few people who has been built up to kick out of finishers and not make it seems too over the top; the Superman Punch crescendo was something to behold, as Reigns kept laying into him but couldn't get him to drop. You can just see like the boss's health bar slowly dropping on each hit with Lesnar.

I do agree with your Lesnar comment, but if it was only Lesnar the one kicking out of finishers that wouldn't be a problem, but everyone, or several people do it.

If Lesnar is that guy that takes 3 finishers to be beaten, fine, but currently anyone pretty much can/has/will kick out of any finisher just because the booking is shit.
 

I Wanna Be The Guy

U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A!
I dug the Triple H entrance. I got the feeling he didn't bother telling Sting about the movie cross promotion as he had a real what the fuck expression going on. Match was entertaining but fuck Triple H burying the guy that was supposed to be unstoppable and that weird handshake thing at the end.
The trips entrance was just funny. A so bad it's good kinda thing. And I'm so glad Triple H won. Other than Seth coming out at the end Trips getting the win was the biggest YES! moment of the night for me. Didn't expect it and I haven't been a fan of Sting for a long time now so seeing Sting lose made me very happy. The handshake was weird though.
 

Khrno

Member
I can't remember where that started. I want to say WM15 when Austin/Rock kicked out of each others finishers which I believe had not been done before. I could be wrong though but I agree. Finishers need to be protected.

However, say finishers were well protected, I still think last night should have played out the exact same way. To my earlier point I believe Roman kicking out was merely to aggravate Brock more than anything and had finishers be as protected as you describe that would have been a huge deal for Roman. It already was but it would have been on a whole other level.

To your point, another thing that bothers me is some superstars are absolutely terrible at selling a pinfall. The amount of times I see a superstar looking up at the ref waiting on the 3 count to happen so they can leave really irritates the hell out of me.

That's why I said that Lesnar should have only done two F5s, the one at the beginning which wouldn't beat Reigns since he is a "tough guy", and the second one at the end where he wasn't pinned due to Lesnar selling. That would have improved the match a lot for me.

As far as pins go, Cena was awful last night in that respect, dude was kicking out right at 2, he wasn't waiting for that 2 and 3/4 or 9/10s, no, it was a two count and he was up already, so those pinfalls felt really week, and that's not Rusev fault at all.

Austin mentions in his podcast quite often the same thing, that the many guys just keep looking at the referee for when to kick out. Ziggler has this problem, but unlike Cena he does kicks out at 2 and 9/10s, but still there's many guys specially in the past that are selling with their eyes shut and do more believable kick outs.

Sting was bad on his kick outs too, but I think that's due to his age, not his timing or looking at the referee, man the guy looked (is) too old already.
 

Hex

Banned
I dug the Triple H entrance. I got the feeling he didn't bother telling Sting about the movie cross promotion as he had a real what the fuck expression going on. Match was entertaining but fuck Triple H burying the guy that was supposed to be unstoppable and that weird handshake thing at the end.

You can not be that much of a mark.
The prep that goes into that kind of thing you can not avoid knowing about. The stage build, practice, outfit. Trips would be telling everyone.
It leaked to the press a day or two before Mania.
Sting was selling.
 

MaulerX

Member
I wish the network has the option to turn off the commentary


Is there anyone out there that does live play-by-play of these events that you can tune into? Kinda like watching any sports game, if I don't like the TV commentary I lower the volume and listen to the radio broadcast instead.
 
Is there anyone out there that does live play-by-play of these events that you can tune into? Kinda like watching any sports game, if I don't like the TV commentary I lower the volume and listen to the radio broadcast instead.

I used to do this with Cubs games when I was half paying attention. Usually the radio broadcast is a few seconds ahead of the game so this doesn't really work if I am truly watching it -.-
 

Mr Cola

Brothas With Attitude / The Wrong Brotha to Fuck Wit / Die Brotha Die / Brothas in Paris
One thing Wrestlemania gave me was Bray Wyatts awesome theme music, been listening to it all day, wonderful stuff.
 

yuraya

Member
Daaang I didn't know Mania is at Jerry's world next year. That is gonna be some massive event.

I hope they deliver.

GIve me:

Lesnar vs Bryan for title

Rock vs HHH

Taker vs Stang

Another ladder match

Cant think of anything for Cena, Rusev, Reigns, Orton or Rollins tho.
 

shoplifter

Member
Finisher stuff.

Why don't they start having guys win matches with stuff that *aren't* their finishers? True 'finishers' only get brought out when shit gets real.

Kobashi only used the Burning Hammer like 7 or 8 times, he could hit other moves to win (Orange Crush/Moonsault/etc) but he always had it in his back pocket if he needed it.

Really, WWE (and ECW/WCW/ETC) did this to themselves by selling the signature moves as the be all end all of a match. They ended up booking themselves into a corner because they didn't have anywhere else to go other than 'welp, lets have you kick out of three+ finishers' and now they're pretty much death on normal TV but in a PPV main they mean nothing. Weekly live TV and monthly PPVs didn't help either because guys got more exposed.

They IMO should take the opportunity to let guys do more with finishes that don't rely on a guy's finisher to be used every single match. It's pretty clear that most of the 'top' guys on the roster could pull this off easily, and it would help give back the mystique that the finisher once had. This would also have the added bonus of matches actually ending on normalish stuff that Cole has to oversell right now, making it sound ridiculous.
 

a916

Member
I've seen pensioners on Bum Fights, I don't need to see it again. Sting could barley do a scorpion death lock and if Taker was anymore sluggish, he would have actually been crawling around in goo.

He's already at that point to be honest... it's boring as all hell.
 
One of the biggest what ifs of this generation will be "what if Brock Lesnar never left WWE". I wonder whether Cena / Lesnar becomes Austin / Rock. Bret / Shawn, etc.

My "what if" senario for a long time now has been what the WWF would've been like in the mid to late 80s and beyond if Vince had a physical freak like Brock back then. Would he be treated like Hogan or if heel like an unstoppable beast or would he end up another monster for the Hulkster to slay?

No, the real problem with Sting/HHH was the commentary constantly shitting on WCW like it was 2001 all over again.

I tuned out the commentary for most of the show. They got two assholes and another guy who half the time is quiet now days.

I think its safe to say that Sting in the WWE was 15 years too late, and I probably don't need to see that again. It really broke my heart.

Pretty much. That's what I've been saying for the last several years with the Sting stuff. It's just sad at this point.
 
Sting should've been went great muta mode and went all bald and got a cool as mask with his design. Imagine him bald with a redesigned scorpion or crow mask. Would be cool as shit if done right. Japan always ahead of the game.
Or just go old school Sting where he already had a close-cropped do.
 
Pretty much. That's what I've been saying for the last several years with the Sting stuff. It's just sad at this point.

I don't think it was sad. It was an ok match. Of course he can't go full time but Sting was the biggest American wrestling star to never appear in their company. He also never talked shit about WWE and refused to be apart of the general stupidity Russo and Ferrerrerrha were lying down. He was a damned hard worker, put people over and didn't try to gut the business out of bitterness. With WWE the last company standing they are holding the keys to The Wrestling HoF in general. They want him in the HoF like he should be; So they get him out for a big Wrestlemania moment and now he can go into the HoF and be honored like he should be.

Any more than this could be sad but last night wasn't IMO.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
Why don't they start having guys win matches with stuff that *aren't* their finishers? True 'finishers' only get brought out when shit gets real.

Kobashi only used the Burning Hammer like 7 or 8 times, he could hit other moves to win (Orange Crush/Moonsault/etc) but he always had it in his back pocket if he needed it.

Really, WWE (and ECW/WCW/ETC) did this to themselves by selling the signature moves as the be all end all of a match. They ended up booking themselves into a corner because they didn't have anywhere else to go other than 'welp, lets have you kick out of three+ finishers' and now they're pretty much death on normal TV but in a PPV main they mean nothing. Weekly live TV and monthly PPVs didn't help either because guys got more exposed.

They IMO should take the opportunity to let guys do more with finishes that don't rely on a guy's finisher to be used every single match. It's pretty clear that most of the 'top' guys on the roster could pull this off easily, and it would help give back the mystique that the finisher once had. This would also have the added bonus of matches actually ending on normalish stuff that Cole has to oversell right now, making it sound ridiculous.

This. This. So much this. DDTs used to end matches. Using Bryan as an example; the Knee (now renamed the Crusher, because he should totally name it the Crusher) would be used in PPV events; but the flying headbutt or even the flurry of kicks ending with the head kick would be how he beats any non Main Eventer.
 
This. This. So much this. DDTs used to end matches. Using Bryan as an example; the Knee (now renamed the Crusher, because he should totally name it the Crusher) would be used in PPV events; but the flying headbutt or even the flurry of kicks ending with the head kick would be how he beats any non Main Eventer.
I agree. WWE wants to have each wrestler maintain their formula of moves that with repetition becomes widely identified by the audience. This tends to lead to formulaic matches, and a homogenization of their in-ring product to an extent, in my opinion.

I believe there should be a wide array of moves that can finish matches.
 
I agree. WWE wants to have each wrestler maintain their formula of moves that with repetition becomes widely identified by the audience. This tends to lead to formulaic matches, and a homogenization of their in-ring product to an extent, in my opinion.

I believe there should be a wide array of moves that can finish matches.

To be fair, this is a carryover from the territories days, when most people only got to see a wrestler once in a while, not on TV, and so they had to have a repeatable formula of moves that worked to build up to the end of the match. It also made working with the talent better... a guy from one territory could wrestle for a month in another territory and they'd quickly have the finishing move set down. It's part of what made Bret Hart such a draw, but was also true of a lot of other guys. Hart was one of the few faces who built to a finisher with successive moves, where as most faces (especially in the 80's WWE) "hulked up" to a finisher and pulled it out of their trunks after being held down by the heel for a while.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom