Xbox community criticizes DF's bias (in Thumbnails) towards the new Xbox console in their coverage

If you think that's bad, they outsourced their reaction to Switch 2:
YR5209yXl7xsqxJL.jpg
When you need to take a shit but you remember you just superglued your butthole shut.
 
🤣 this fucking schizo man.

yes, the overall bandwidth per second is lower than the peak possible bandwidth of the fast memory. that is still not even remotely comparable to what the 970 did, as that card inevitably ran into compatibility issues where part of the memory was simply not detected at all by the game, making it effectively a 3.5GB card. and on top of that, the memory speed difference was insane. it was a fraction of the speed of the rest of the VRAM, while on Series X, all it really does is push down the average GB/s by maybe ~20% at most, if even that.

the VRAM setup of the 970 meanwhile, when it was actually detected correctly by the game, could completely crash the speeds and introduce massive stutters whenever the slower memory was accessed.


now, stop schizo posting

The memory bandwidth when accessing the SX's two RAM pools drops to LESS than the PS5's memory bandwidth

Learn to shut up, you idiot.
The Xbox SX is a piece of shit for Azure.
The 1.8GHz clock speed, a garbage downclock, is because it's a conservative server clock for Azure.
The split memory is because Azure uses an SX with 20GB of RAM to run four Xbox One instances.
The Xbox SX is shit because they committed to Azure. YOU, the idiot who bought the SX, subsidize the Xbox Cloud servers with Azure.

But the old idiot from DF thought it was the PS5 with a "last-minute overclock."

While it was MS that was making everyone, the "12tf" fans, look like idiots and whores.
 
Last edited:
Same DF that were inventing myths about PS5 bottlenecks and were provided with Xbox Series reveal hardware back in 2020? Uh-uh.

People do have memory of a goldfish.
 
Top Bottom