Who is he?
If he's a Sony exec, then that's a very good sign.
I googled him, he is an SCEA producer.
Who is he?
If he's a Sony exec, then that's a very good sign.
How though? There's no reason to do sales now, it would be like feeding the stray cats gathered outside your door some extra nibbles out of pity.If that's the case, I feel we would all be better off in a full-on Steam type situation. Less confusing than this half measure, and you might see better sales.
I would love it if I had some goddamn games to play on it. But I know Nintendo will deliver some classics, which is why I bought it.
Doesn't stop me from feeling like a fool for buying it at launch though.
I don't understand why people are OK with this but weren't OK with the older news.
Going by a Google search, he's a SCEA executive producer.
this is good guys, a real fucking good sign.
If Sony does ANYTHING like this, I don't fucking care if it's only SLIGHTLY like Xbone, I swear I will be a PC + Wii U only player this generation. It is a matter of principle
I LOVE this guy's quotes.
Highly doubt that.I don't see where his twitter account is verified? Maybe its a fake?
A couple of us brought this up about a week ago but I dont think most of GAF really believed that this surveillance was happening. It is happening, and collecting information from the Kinect peripheral would be even more useful than phone conversations and internet logs.
•You are in control of what Kinect can see and hear: By design, you will determine how responsive and personalized your Xbox One is to you and your family during setup. The system will navigate you through key privacy options, like automatic or manual sign in, privacy settings, and clear notifications about how data is used. When Xbox One is on and you’re simply having a conversation in your living room, your conversation is not being recorded or uploaded.
•You are in control of when Kinect sensing is On, Off or Paused: If you don’t want the Kinect sensor on while playing games or enjoying your entertainment, you can pause Kinect. To turn off your Xbox One, just say “Xbox Off.” When the system is off, it’s only listening for the single voice command -- “Xbox On,” and you can even turn that feature off too. Some apps and games may require Kinect functionality to operate, so you’ll need to turn it back on for these experiences.
•You are in control of your personal data: You can play games or enjoy applications that use data, such as videos, photos, facial expressions, heart rate and more, but this data will not leave your Xbox One without your explicit permission. Here are a few examples of potential future scenarios:
◦A fitness game could measure heart rate data to provide you with improved feedback on your workout, allow you to track your progress, or even measure calories burned.
◦A card game could allow you to bluff your virtual opponent using your facial expressions.
At least whenever they come and you buy them you'll be able to do whatever the fuck you want with them, considering that they will 100 percent belong to you.
Crazy concept, I know.
Anti-piracy, among other things. Mandatory security updates during check-in.
I would love it if I had some goddamn games to play on it. But I know Nintendo will deliver some classics, which is why I bought it.
Doesn't stop me from feeling like a fool for buying it at launch though.
I LOVE this guy's quotes.
"And you know I always buy things new - I just like having access to it with as few strings attached as possible."
"Yeah, but that still doesn't make it feel any better. Can't collect what you don't really own, right?"
Superb!
Apologies if this has been discussed before, but do we have any concrete info on what "participating retailers" actually means?
I finished Zombi U and sold it to a mate for £20. I used that money to buy NSMBU brand new on Amazon. I then traded that in at CEX for cash and used that money to buy some eshop games on the 3DS.
with the Xbone, none of that would have been possible. I'm absolutely amazed by how fucked it all is.
If it's about principle why would you have a console that restricts digital purchases to a single, specific piece of hardware?
I don't see where his twitter account is verified? Maybe its a fake?
Highly doubt that.
Based on what?
That's not happening.
Participating retailers would need to be hooked up to a Microsoft database to transfer games from one user to another. Gamestop will be a participating retailer. I'm not sure who the other participating retailers will be.
Yeah of course it is dude.
No.
Based on what?
http://youtu.be/ryB-hdtpQRw - Angry Joe
I don't understand why people are OK with this but weren't OK with the older news.
But that is something easily avoided by buying games like we have for the past decade. On a disc.
Two 'optional' systems are not necessarily the same.
A key point is what the default position is.
With Microsoft's system, opt-in means a publisher allows the limited trade of second hand games. Opt-out means that trade won't work at all.
In another optional system, opt-in might mean a publisher allows the limited trade of second hand games, while opt-out means second hand games work as they always did before.
There's a pretty big difference between the two systems. The first is crafted so that publishers opting in look like relative 'good guys', and completely eliminates the possibility of other publishers undermining them by going DRM free or whatever.
The second system is crafted so that publishers opting in look like relative 'bad guys' and leaves the market open to competition from DRM-free pubs, or open to influence from consumer behaviour that attracts pubs to DRM-free games.
To date, when people have talked about an opt-in Sony system, I think they've been thinking of the second kind of system. But with MS opening a whole new world, who knows... we shall see. Just don't assume one 'opt-in' system is the same as another.
That's not happening.
Then why not straight up allow users to be able to turn on and use the XB1 without Kinect? After we learned what's happening today and how easily the NSA can access the data you've uploaded to the internet, do they really expect people to just blindly trust a company like Microsoft that they're going to protect that data?
Facebook and GMail tell you the same kind of shit, but they're off giving the government every single thing you ever do.
I don't understand why people are OK with this but weren't OK with the older news.
The Kaz one is obvious satire. This guy looks legit.Again take anything coming out of that account with a grain of salt. His account is not verified and could be like the fake Kaz twitter.
The 24 hour check up is required otherwise the whole system of licencing falls apart. Unless every system is telling the server what game license is active, on a specific account, and on what system it is active, the whole thing could easily be circumvented. The lockdown after that 24 hour period is exactly for preventing people from taking that disc and giving it to a friend to play while their one is offline. You can get away with it for a few hours, but eventually the system will prevent you from playing until it verifies you are legit.
Detecting piracy and auto downloading security updates are simply a bonus for microsoft.
I would imagine they want a game to be able to say: "We're going to need to turn on XYZ Kinect functions to support this game mode, mmmK?"Then why not straight up allow users to be able to turn on and use the XB1 without Kinect? After we learned what's happening today and how easily the NSA can access the data you've uploaded to the internet, do they really expect people to just blindly trust a company like Microsoft that they're going to protect that data?
How though? There's no reason to do sales now, it would be like feeding the stray cats gathered outside your door some extra nibbles out of pity.
Don't have to buy digital.If it's about principle why would you have a console that restricts digital purchases to a single, specific piece of hardware?
Giant LoL @ the social media advertising accounts on the first few pages of this thread. Microsoft really went full retard this time around.
Based on logic, common sense, and his LinkedIn profile.
but you know what, why don't you get onto Twitter and ask him if he's real or not? You can share your findings with us afterwards if you wish!
You better ask yosp if he's real too! After all, he's not verified!!
It's definitely the best solution I've seen. So basically like this?
- Games require a one-time internet connection to be activated.
- Once activated:
--- A license check occurs every 24 hours
--- They can be played without a disc as long as the license has been verified
--- If they can't verify that you own the game (ie, if you're offline) you need to insert the disc to play
Also, I'll add:
- If you activate the game on your console, the license is revoked from the previous owner
Basically allows you to trade the game between anyone and everyone, and doesn't require always online to play.
MS could've easily gone with this. Unfortunately I think they're bending over backwards for publishers.
So Microsoft has to approve of me (like a doting parent) playing a new game I bought every 24 hours.
Since I can't rent, I won't be inclined to buy a game unless I fully wait for several reviews. So there goes any day 1 sale. And if I can't buy used (if the publisher says no-no), then I will wait until its marked down so low the publisher probably won't see a dime when I buy it.
If I take my console anywhere for more than one day (like I do my Wii / Wii U at Christmas) that does not have internet, I'm boned.
No word yet on if I also have to pay Microsoft for the pleasure of playing online.
Not...finding a lot to get me racing to a pre-order here. And I agree with the others - if you're making a product so cumbersome that a pirate will have an easier time using it (ignoring cost) then the average consumer...shame on you.
I don't understand why people are OK with this but weren't OK with the older news.
Exactly. The 24-hour check thing defies explanation.I don't think that's needed.
It could just register that copy of the game to an account the first time it's put in.
If someone else took the disc and tried to install/activate, it should fail and say it's already linked to another account since that first activation is saved in the system.
It's no different than PC games/software with CD keys that require activation online. If the number of installs is used up, it won't activate.
No need for daily checks to stop piracy as the system can just block any installs/activations if that copy of the game is already linked to another account.