I have a middle of the range Panasonic 4k 50 inch tv with HDR, however the HDR aint that good on it and I prefer to leave it with SDR.
But your saying the increased res, higher settings and better textures dont account to anything?
Using your logic ppl might as well get an x1s.
While im typing this I've just been playing titanfall 2 on xbox one fat and im very impressed by the visuals given that its like 900p, but a resolution that's over 4x higher and better textures has to make quite the difference in overall calrity and sharpness.
Also why did you get a pro if HDR is the only benefit? Og PS4 has HDR?
I got a pro for the 1.8 to 2.1 CPU (better stable frame rates) but hardly a 30 to 60 bump, 1600p / 1800p / 2160cb all looks very similar. I hada feeling about this before I bought pro, was on GAF daily praying for Ryzen and Witcher3 at 60 FPS (maybe next gen)....
I also have a Panny 802b 50 inch 4K, and resolution was not that exciting over 1080p. 55 inch LG B7 and I still dont care about 1600 or 1800 or 2160, HDR really stands out against jet blacks though and suprised me allot, and is more the TV quality of a top end 2017 model I guess....and there are a few OG Ps4 60 FPS titles that are 900p which is no good..
If I was xb1 900p then yeah, thats soft as hell, day 1 xb1X - my logic is that 1440p seems to be the sweetspot for noticing resoolution on 50 -55 inches at 8ft.
But once you get to 1440p its who gives a crap (been playing on 4k for almost a year now and kinda stoped looking at res differences in games after a month).
Give it a few months, you also wont care about 1800p vs 2160p and will be reading DF wondering if they managed to squeeze out 60 FPS from the jaguar and who cares about the ground texture 40 ft away that you cant see anyway unless DF are zoomed in on a screencap.
Both Xb1X and Pro are very imbalanced power consoles, I hope next gen we get mega CPU's, more faster memory and fast load times.