Meh. After I win the lottery tonight I am departing for Mars to chill in my clock.
It has a height of nearly 22 km (14 mi). This makes it the second tallest mountain in the Solar System
Olympus Mons is kind of boring. It sound really cool at first but then you find out the slope is so gradual that you wouldn't even be able to tell you were standing on a mountain, let alone the second-tallest in the solar system.
aww thats no fun
Can't we put like a giant vacuum into orbit to suck up all the ash?
If the ash cloud covers most of the world for about 2 years (and it might well do) then pretty much everything green will die, then regrow from seeds once the sun comes back. That'll destroy the food chain and probably eradicate upwards of 90% of life on the planet.
Humans are extremely adaptable, but we'd need to know about this years in advance to plan for it. If we had the time, I suppose you could build up enough tinned food supplies for everyone to last that time, but with all the energy networks down and the weather being far colder than normal, some people will, unfortunately, be fucked. Merry Christmas
You want to put a vacuum into the vacuum of space?
I would love and be terrified to see the political reaction to such a massive weakening to America if this were to erupt.
The blast would affect the whole world though by messing up weather patterns, possibly causing food shortage because it would block out the sun. Worldwide we only have a surplus o food that can last 60 days, imagine a summer without crops.
Krakatoa that exploded in the 1880's caused the "year without a summer" in England.
We should fire off all our nukes if it starts to erupt; make sure nobody tries to fuck with us in our weakened state.
The worst part is that this can happen ANY DAY NOW.
That's all I can think of when I hear about stuff like this. Wouldn't it shift the balance of world powers significantly?
I feel like there's a movie idea there.
We should fire off all our nukes if it starts to erupt; make sure nobody tries to fuck with us in our weakened state.
Could the eruption be large enough to shift the plates in CA to cause a massive earthquake?
animals are using their animal instincts
wonder if they'd even warn you it was about to erupt, I mean of course you'd feel it but they would probably announce it at the last second
Science said:On Sunday morning, 30 March, a magnitude-4.8 quake struck Yellowstone National Park, centered about 6.4 kilometers northeast of the parks iconic Norris Geyser Basin. That temblor, the largest to strike the park since 1980, is part of a series of at least 25 quakes that began in the area on Thursday, 27 March. Besides the main shock, the largest quake in this group measured magnitude 3.3.
Is such seismic activity normal?
Yes. There have been three clusters, or swarms, of earthquakes beneath Yellowstone in the past 6 months, says Robert Smith, a geophysicist at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City. Sundays quake is notable only because its somewhat larger than recent temblors. On average, the park experiences about 3000 quakes per year, he notes: Yellowstone never stops shaking.
What caused the quakes?
In general, the presence and movement of molten material at shallow and intermediate depths beneath Yellowstone is what triggers much of the seismic activity there. (The heat from that molten rock, of course, is the driving force for the parks iconic geysers.) Sundays magnitude-4.8 quake was centered in a region where instruments have measured the landscape rising and falling for the past several months. That connection, too, is normal: A previous period of uplift in the same area between 1996 and 2003 was also accompanied by increased seismic activity. Nevertheless, Smith says, the causes of specific quakes and swarms are difficult to pin down. There have been spates of quakes without uplift, and there have been extended periods of uplift without abnormally high seismic activity.
Are these quakes related to those in southern California?
Probably not. Although its possible for a quake in one area to trigger others along faults in a distant region, the Yellowstone quakes are much more likely to be related to geological changes taking place locally within Earths crust.
Do the Yellowstone quakes pose a future threat?
Unlikely. Theres no sign that the current swarm of quakes is any different from those experienced there in recent months or years, and it doesnt seem to be linked to any volcanic processes, he notes.
Whats next?
A field team from the U.S. Geological Survey arrived in Yellowstone on Sunday. Theyre assessing the area near the quakes epicenter to see if the event altered the terrain, and theyll also check to see if the seismic activity has changed the size or eruption frequency of geysers in the area.
We should organize a large orgy before the volcano kills us all.