It can't be that though, it's supposed to be an Xbox One exclusive and that runs at 1080p 60fps so that automatically rules the Modern Warfare Collection out.Oh, wait. They included this.
Gamespot's reliability just sunk through the depths of hell.
Gamespot rumor: Big third-party Xbox One exclusive at E3
- Thread starter nbnt
- Start date
- Status
MasterLeePhD
Member
Sony would do the exact same thing if they had some extra cash in the bank. It's just how businesses work. And it's probably a safer bet than setting up a new studio to then sack the majority of them after the game has shipped.
Steverulez
Member
My personal opinion is that if MS are going to go for third party exclusives (for hire developers like Platinum don't count as a third party in my opinion) they should go for new IPs.
At this stage unless there is a big reason why multi platform development is causing issues (which I severely doubt) then moneyhatting a known franchise would be much more costly than getting a new unknown IP.
At this stage unless there is a big reason why multi platform development is causing issues (which I severely doubt) then moneyhatting a known franchise would be much more costly than getting a new unknown IP.
There's no chance MS would be willing to spend so much money on getting exclusivity for a single game. They care more about money than winning a console war and buying the exclusivity of any of those games would cost faaar too much.
MS are not willing to lose money to win an imaginary war...
iceatcs
Junior Member
I think MS really want PS pie, and willing loss for that.
In my opinion, EA, Activision, Ubisoft and Take-Two are out of the question.
They dont need Microsoft's money and they want to be on as many platforms as they can. (except the Wii U of course).
Capcom, SEGA and Namco Bandai are more likely to take the deal. Of course all this is relevant only if the deal is recent. If the deal was made a year ago then anything is possible.
They dont need Microsoft's money and they want to be on as many platforms as they can. (except the Wii U of course).
Capcom, SEGA and Namco Bandai are more likely to take the deal. Of course all this is relevant only if the deal is recent. If the deal was made a year ago then anything is possible.
Yeah but you see... that strategy didnt exactly work wonders for 360 in the long run...
it came to the point were PS3 had like 10 exclusives coming out in 2013 vs 2 exclusives for 360.
Getting 3rd party exclusives aint gonna seal the deal. Titanfall is a perfect and -recent- example.
sure, but we've had countless 'big news incoming' threads based on website teases, and they're nearly always disappointing.
No point arguing what would objectively be a 'big' exclusive, rather what gamespot would consider enough to tease it as 'big'. And frankly that could be Putty Squad 2
The Rain King
Member
DayZ. Dat console exclusive.
Ganondorfo
Junior Member
They did Killer Instinct (a 16bit game) with that team that made silent hill homecoming.
I think they are going for nostalgia again and making a new Streets of Rage game with Sega with Yuzo Koshiro composing for this game
I think they are going for nostalgia again and making a new Streets of Rage game with Sega with Yuzo Koshiro composing for this game
ajim
Member
:lol :lol :lol
Im sorry but no. They want to make money, they wont pay 1billion+ $ for GTA exclusivity. No chance in hell.
I forgot about smaller games like that. Day Z exclusivity would certainly be pretty big.
Perhaps it's No Man's Sky? There have been rumours of that having console exclusivity...
jeffrockz312
Member
Uncharted 4.
not in such terms, but what people care about for their console wars is which franchises will basically stick around.
i'm trying to bring a lot more structure in determining what is right, since things like '2nd party' don't actually exist in the real world. i think it's better to be more informed and live outside the fictional world of consoles and companies with experience points, hp bars, and limit breaks.
he could really just mean that it's a first-party published title, in which case he would be correct. the last story is a third-party published game, but i don't think people consider it 'a third-party game' when it's copyrighted and trademarked under nintendo. any sort of third-party ownership they may consider is mistwalker, but attributing that much power to the publisher based solely on publishing is incorrect.
well exclusive is exclusive, whether it's timed (perhaps what mass effect was), a deal for just one+ game (sonic lost world/sonic boom), or outsourced first-party ips (excite truck). all of them have their places on list wars, but something like the wonderful 101 is going to be more prestigious than lego city undercover. people who have invested in one platform are going to want more and expect the same level of quality. there's less of a chance with that regarding the first two options. that's when knowing exactly what a property is would be good, when backing up your arguments with facts and stuff.
this all stemmed from rrc1594 asking the difference between 2nd party and 3rd party. there is no such thing as 2nd party in the real world, so the point is to distinguish the purpose of a 3rd party in relation to 1st parties. that's really what it comes down to, and there are a lot of details and variations. dumbing that down does no one any favors.
travisbickle
Member
Interesting to see if and what goes exclusive for this E3.
The Dead Rising franchise was on life support, I'm sure they were touting it out to all console manufacturers. But a successful last gen title going exclusive, after seeing the sales figures, will be interesting.
The Dead Rising franchise was on life support, I'm sure they were touting it out to all console manufacturers. But a successful last gen title going exclusive, after seeing the sales figures, will be interesting.
Must be true then.
Well, technically they don't even know what it is either so we are going off of someone else telling gamespot it's "big".
Steverulez
Member
Lol Thuway. MS probably bought Capcom then.
HORRORSHØW
Member
lmao
Canis lupus
Member
MS is only one can do that. GTA, Mass Effect and RE7, mark my word.
Nope, MS had that ability last gen for a number of reasons: 360 was selling more, it was easier to develop for, PS3 was bombing, MS was willing to moneyhat the big games and only ended up getting a timed exclusive GTA DLC.
No big game will ignore the PS4, they can't afford to.
Lol, you don't need him to tell you it isn't RE.
Tatersalad
Member
This. I'm pretty sure what gamespot considers 'big' and what the people posting here think is pretty different.
Rare going third party confirmed!
Melchiah
Member
That's the only one which would piss me off as a PS4 owner. I don't think it's likely after releasing the trilogy for the PS3, especially as EA was happy with ME2 sales eventhough the late port wasn't even marketed. Considering the PS4's userbase, they'd leave substantial sales behind. Just like FFXV would, if it were to pass the XB1.
I'm more or less indifferent about DC4 & RE7, unless the series would actually return to the glory of the early entries. GTAV & HL3 won't ever be exclusive, nor Fallout 4 & L4D3 leave PC behind, nor DQXI & MH5 be tied to a platform that's not popular in Japan.
PG doing BattleToads well God Damn. That would be something
Cornbread78
Member
Umm, we already have Titanfall, DR3 & to a much lesser extent the timed PvZ:GW. Having games exclusive to the XB1 is a way to stand out when they lack in hardware.
I certainly hope not.
friskykillface
Banned
I can see it being left 4 dead 3, console exclusive of course, it'll still come out on PC
TheDarkKnight774
Member
Beyond Good and Evil 2!
WavyStretch
Neo Member
People saying GTA want they're heads busting. That would cost $1 billion, its just ridiculous to claim that. $250 million to develop and sales of 30 million copies over 2 platforms, lost revenue from the other platform would be at least $500 million if not more. Just no.
Steverulez
Member
Microsoft want to make money, so I doubt BG&E2 will be it!
Feel free to save this post for when/if it comes out and its a huge hit
Plinko
Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Rare is first-party.
That would be great but first of all this will not be a 3rd party exclusive since MS owns the IP and IIRC CBOAT said that the Platinum exclusive will cause some shitstorm but not on the same degree as Bayo 2 so it will probably be a sequel to a known title. Of course this goes against ntrkl's leak which implied that it would be a new IP directed by Kamiya.
BumblebeeCody
Member
Killer Instinct Season 2?
Triggerhappytel
Member
Completely agree, and I think the lukewarm sales of Titanfall will have reinforced this for EA and all publishers.
AntiFacebook
Member
Could be, but i don't think too many people outside of NeoGAF will get excited by that.
mocolostrocolos
Member
That is a Microsoft owned IP and we know who's developing it.
ValeYard
Member
Yeah, it WOULD suck if anyone locked this up, but there was that tweet from Monsieur Spencer the other day that I can't find on twitter anymore but got from the thread on No Man's sky...
TalentBurke
Member
Must be a Square Enix game.
- Status