BruiserBear
Banned
Then why did you buy the more expensive console
Might want to read what he said again.
Then why did you buy the more expensive console
AAA games this gen would cost upwards of 100mil per title.
Microsoft did the right thing imo with 3rd parties because the majority of sony's first party studio's closed down during the PS3 era
And if you think about it, Microsoft has always relied on exclusive 3rd party support
They have the most first party titles on the way in 2014
And what would you rather have, Titanfall or Killzone? That is our options
E3 is almost here, hopefully we all have more options by then
That is true about system sales, but I thought Xbox does better in software sales
If that is true, that is what developers care about the most. Systems sold is just something for console fanatics to talk about
Might want to read what he said again.
If only...I heard it was going to be Dragon's Dogma 2...
As long as MS has enough money, a third party game can ignore the PS4.
Didn't it turn out to be true last year with Dead Rising 3 though?
AAA games this gen would cost upwards of 100mil per title.
Microsoft did the right thing imo with 3rd parties because the majority of sony's first party studio's closed down during the PS3 era
And if you think about it, Microsoft has always relied on exclusive 3rd party support
They have the most first party titles on the way in 2014[b/]
And what would you rather have, Titanfall or Killzone? That is our options
E3 is almost here, hopefully we all have more options by then
That is true about system sales, but I thought Xbox does better in software sales
If that is true, that is what developers care about the most. Systems sold is just something for console fanatics to talk about
It's not like Microsoft gave Phil Spencer a blank check. As this gen goes on it's going to be more and more expensive for MS to buy exclusives, especially for major franchises.
I hope it's a Wonderful 101 sequel just so I can see GAF melt down in realtime.
There are plenty of devs out there that need money to make the games they want. As can be seen by layoffs and closures.
My favourite part of this article is "at least one".
Didn't it turn out to be true last year with Dead Rising 3 though?
AAA games this gen would cost upwards of 100mil per title.
Microsoft did the right thing imo with 3rd parties because the majority of sony's first party studio's closed down during the PS3 era
And if you think about it, Microsoft has always relied on exclusive 3rd party support
They have the most first party titles on the way in 2014
And what would you rather have, Titanfall or Killzone? That is our options
E3 is almost here, hopefully we all have more options by then
That is true about system sales, but I thought Xbox does better in software sales
If that is true, that is what developers care about the most. Systems sold is just something for console fanatics to talk about
Wow there is so much bullshit here.
Plenty of independent devs, yes.
But when we hear 'big 3rd-party exclusive', that implies successful franchise games that are already publisher-funded because they're safe investments, but made exclusive anyway.
MS can easily pay for the development of Assassin's Creed or Call of Duty on behalf of Ubi/Acti. But they won't accept MS's money, because by choosing to invest in development themselves, they get greater returns from a multiplatform install base.
That's my least favourite. I really dislike third party exclusives. :/
Gamespot rumor? This has been a social media rumor for months now.
Hardly surprising, though. XB1's lineup of games would be pitiful right now if it wasn't for third-party moneyhats.
Instead of money hatting 3rd parties how about MS moneyhat themselves? Between Titanfall, the 400 million on the NFL deal and this they could of spent that money making like 20 exclusive 'AAA' games.
I feel like we do this every e3.
As long as MS has enough money, a third party game can ignore the PS4.
You should realize the difference. Games like Dead Rising 3 and Titanfall very well might not have come out were it not for MS helping with funding and helping development. In DR3s case, MS spent incredible amounts of effort in development by sending their employees to the office in Canada to help with dev.
So please, stop pretending like all they are doing is throwing money at games to keep them off of other systems, when in reality they are often helping to find and develop games that are stuck and need assistance. Not everything is that simple, so don't pretend to know what you are talking about.
Obsidian is a dev that would most likely gladly accept funding for a game they would like to make.
Isn't Ruffian rumored to make X1 game
Brad Grenz said:If MS wanted an exclusive for the Xbox One from them they wouldn't have cancelled the game they contracted them to make for the Xbox One like 2 years ago.
AAA games this gen would cost upwards of 100mil per title.
Microsoft did the right thing imo with 3rd parties because the majority of sony's first party studio's closed down during the PS3 era
And if you think about it, Microsoft has always relied on exclusive 3rd party support
They have the most first party titles on the way in 2014
And what would you rather have, Titanfall or Killzone? That is our options
E3 is almost here, hopefully we all have more options by then
That is true about system sales, but I thought Xbox does better in software sales
If that is true, that is what developers care about the most. Systems sold is just something for console fanatics to talk about
*Garden Warfare Joke*
AAA games this gen would cost upwards of 100mil per title.
Microsoft did the right thing imo with 3rd parties because the majority of sony's first party studio's closed down during the PS3 era
And if you think about it, Microsoft has always relied on exclusive 3rd party support
They have the most first party titles on the way in 2014
And what would you rather have, Titanfall or Killzone? That is our options
E3 is almost here, hopefully we all have more options by then
That is true about system sales, but I thought Xbox does better in software sales
If that is true, that is what developers care about the most. Systems sold is just something for console fanatics to talk about
January 25, 2014 - National Opposite Day
Samaritan
A platinum game might be big for GAF. Outside of GAF, not so much. Me and all my friends don't care about a platinum game. When they say big I'm sure they mean a AAA blockbusterIt has to be Platinum's game. How is a Platinum game not big?
Samaritan
It better not be damn DayZ.
It's Cranky Kong in Vanquish 2.Also this is the vaguest fucking thing I've ever heard
SOMEONE TOLD US A THING MIGHT BE HAPPENING THAT PEOPLE WILL BE EXCITED TO SEE HAPPEN BUT DON'T SEE COMING AND DIDN'T TELL US WHAT IT IS, GET HYYYYYPE
Can we get CBOAT in here?
![]()
Kinda like the PS4's?
Well, both consoles have shipped one exclusive FPS so far, and I think the vast majority of people would choose Titanfall if given the choice. If you don't believe me just look at the rage that occurred when it was announced as never coming to PS4.
why? sounds like a good rumour for MS.
Exclusive reveal....
Isn't Ruffian rumored to make X1 game
He hinted about Halo 5 Guardians before it was revealed.
AAA games this gen would cost upwards of 100mil per title.
Microsoft did the right thing imo with 3rd parties because the majority of sony's first party studio's closed down during the PS3 era
And if you think about it, Microsoft has always relied on exclusive 3rd party support
They have the most first party titles on the way in 2014
And what would you rather have, Titanfall or Killzone? That is our options
E3 is almost here, hopefully we all have more options by then
That is true about system sales, but I thought Xbox does better in software sales
If that is true, that is what developers care about the most. Systems sold is just something for console fanatics to talk about