iceatcs
Junior Member
why? sounds like a good rumour for MS.
I think someone want leak not rumour.
why? sounds like a good rumour for MS.
Titanfall isn't exclusive (if it was only on their consoles, it would be fine to say that IMO, but it's on PC). If you wanted to treat TF as an exclusive all the PS4/PC games would have to be considered.Well, both consoles have shipped one exclusive FPS so far, and I think the vast majority of people would choose Titanfall if given the choice. If you don't believe me just look at the rage that occurred when it was announced as never coming to PS4.
Where are the moneyhatted PS4 games?
The Order? Whatever Quantic Dream is working on?
Where are the moneyhatted PS4 games?
I don't really see how your form of structuring a definition is any "more right" setting aside the term 2nd party not being a real term (which again, seems something that Phil Spencer is unaware). I don't know of any particular Oxford dictionary of game terms that has empirically determined the correct usage, where language is static and meaning doesn't evolve. You seem to simply be using one delineation to define what is first or third party (IP ownership rights). Is IP ownership a valid delineation, sure. But I don't particularly see how the delineation between internal and external publishing, or internal or external development aren't also valid delineations.not in such terms, but what people care about for their console wars is which franchises will basically stick around.
i'm trying to bring a lot more structure in determining what is right, since things like '2nd party' don't actually exist in the real world. i think it's better to be more informed and live outside the fictional world of consoles and companies with experience points, hp bars, and limit breaks.
I thought XSEED licensed North American publishing rights from the original publisher, i.e. Nintendo. And thus, most consider it a first-party title without ever knowing the IP rights of said title.he could really just mean that it's a first-party published title, in which case he would be correct. the last story is a third-party published game, but i don't think people consider it 'a third-party game' when it's copyrighted and trademarked under nintendo. any sort of third-party ownership they may consider is mistwalker, but attributing that much power to the publisher based solely on publishing is incorrect.
I don't really see why that is or should be the case. I don't know whether anyone considers Dead Rising 3 or Ryse a "less prestigious" game than Forza. I don't think people consider Gears of War a less "prestigious" title than Crackdown. And many would look at all five titles and call them first-party games.but something like the wonderful 101 is going to be more prestigious than lego city undercover
There are nuances. The terms 3rd and 1st party are used in several contexts. I would say though that the context you've determined as apparently the only correct usage is one I rarely see, and I highly doubt most people actually know the trademark ownership rights of every game for which they use these terms.this all stemmed from rrc1594 asking the difference between 2nd party and 3rd party. there is no such thing as 2nd party in the real world, so the point is to distinguish the purpose of a 3rd party in relation to 1st parties. that's really what it comes down to, and there are a lot of details and variations. dumbing that down does no one any favors.
Where are the moneyhatted PS4 games?
The Order? Whatever Quantic Dream is working on?
They are first/second party, like Forza and Halo, not moneyhatted.
He said moneyhatted, not Sony-funded second party studios.
They are first/second party, like Forza and Halo, not moneyhatted.
"Money-hatting" is funding for a game.
Wat?The Order? Whatever Quantic Dream is working on?
"Money-hatting" is funding for a game.
They are first/second party, like Forza and Halo, not moneyhatted.
Actually, those are both first party. Gears was an example of 2nd party, as mentioned by MS on multiple occasions.
Ready At Dawn and Quantic Dream are both independent studios.
I'm gonna say its a new Breath of Fire, cause I have no idea and want this to happen.
Reading this thread i'm anticipating the reactions to the announcement much more than the announcement itself.
AAA games this gen would cost upwards of 100mil per title.
Microsoft did the right thing imo with 3rd parties because the majority of sony's first party studio's closed down during the PS3 era
And if you think about it, Microsoft has always relied on exclusive 3rd party support
They have the most first party titles on the way in 2014
And what would you rather have, Titanfall or Killzone? That is our options
E3 is almost here, hopefully we all have more options by then
That is true about system sales, but I thought Xbox does better in software sales
If that is true, that is what developers care about the most. Systems sold is just something for console fanatics to talk about
Wat?
Well, both consoles have shipped one exclusive FPS so far, and I think the vast majority of people would choose Titanfall if given the choice. If you don't believe me just look at the rage that occurred when it was announced as never coming to PS4.
I remember they moneyhatted Agent in their 2009 E3 conference, but god knows what's going with it now.Sony won't moneyhat a game unless they get to retain the IP, which is really kinda sucky if you're a third-party developer.
He said moneyhatted, not Sony-funded second party studios.
As long as MS has enough money, a third party game can ignore the PS4.
Fallout 4
What do you think moneyhatted games are?
Oh yeah I forgot about that. ;_;But we are already getting a new BoF?
On iOs.
Monster Hunter Betrayalton!
Probably Shenmue 3
And Phil Spencer will get more love for going in his drawer and lazily writing a multi-million dollar check. The old MS playbook, if you can't beat 'em, outspend 'em.