Superheroes: I don't really want to dig for "good storylines", nor do I want to have to ignore certain other works because "it's not part of the main canon" or "it's a different timeline" or so on and so forth. I like my stories to be holistic works, and rarely do I make an exception only in cases of multiple disparate adaptations of an existing work, such as the Maoyuu Maou Yuusha series. From an outside perspective looking in, it feels like there's only one true "canon", the original series, and everything else up to now is more or less officially sanctioned fan fiction.
Others: I read stuff on occasion, The Sandman, Watchmen, The League of Extraordinary Gentleman, Scott Pilgrim. I have others series I have on the back back log, like Hellblazer and Lucifer, because as interesting as they are, comics simply aren't a priority in my life. Part of this is due to art style differences, I never liked the West's fascination with photorealism, whether in comics or in games. I'm a big character design/art style kind of guy, and I'll read something simply if the art looks interesting, no matter the actual quality of the series. An example that immediately comes to mind is O'Malley's Young Avenger's cover:
I was really disappointed to find out he wasn't doing an entire comic, because I would've definitely read that. What I like most about this cover is how you can see the personalities of all the team members reflected in the art. It's cartoony, yes, but visually, it conveys far more information about the story than something like:
(Which is still a good cover, don't get me wrong, but it doesn't have the same narrative impact as O'Malley's.)
Communicating story through art is drastically more difficult to do with photorealistic art, because our brains have different standards for abstracted faces and realistic ones. It's why cartoons characters can behave in ways LA actors can't, without breaking immersion or just becoming cringeworthy.