Ferguson: Police Kill 18yo Black Male; Fire Gas/Rubber Bullets Into Protesting Crowds

Status
Not open for further replies.
Look at that weasely bullshit. Just like that article someone posted a week or two ago. Passive voice out the wazoo. The journalist who wrote this should be fired. How about "a cop shot a kid." You know, actually saying what happened as concisely and directly as possible.

It's about protecting yourself from libel and showing detachment from the situation. Journalists use passive voice when discussing everything from Osama Bin Laden to meth-lab fires.
 

Bradlums

Member
It's funny, because I was responding to what I thought was a shitpost. That said, a kid got murdered by a system that isn't supposed to do that shit and, SURPRISE, it was another young black man. People don't have a right to loot, and no one is saying that they do, but people are angry and I can't really say I blame anyone for that.

a disproportionate amount of black on white crime occurs daily compared to white on black crime and your same "system" covers that up as well. shit goes both ways my man
 

Camp Lo

Banned
you are correct. the people approaching said problem with said approach are not guilty of white guilt. that does not encompass everyone in this thread though. some people here are not only saying it's reflexive to riot, but that people SHOULD be looting and fucking shit up in general to just stir the pot. because white america has had it coming for so long

Can you post those quotes, I haven't read up since last night.
 

Renzoku

Banned
Like Steve said, it's a convenient way for people to distract themselves from the very real issue that lead up to this kid getting killed.

People are like "Whew, a bunch of black people are rioting now, I thought we were going to have to talk about why some kid got murdered by a cop again." It's stupid that they did it but you can easily empathize with their feelings of hopelessness and condemnation that led to them rioting in the first place.

What people should be focusing on is this kid that got shot in the back.

People will focus on it. Probably for months. Trayvon's lawyer getting involved seems to have the making of turning this into a national circus.

The point is, this rioting isn't some sort of fabrication designed to take away from the killing, rather it's a direct result of it, and it was the primary event occurring in the hours after the shooting. It can't just be ignored, but it will also probably fall off as the primary point of discussion after a few days once we know more about what happened and the legal battle commences.
 
Honestly I see both the initial confrontation and the ensuing riots as being equally news worthy, but if the mods decide for this thread to be solely about the confrontation then so be it. Though, this story is not as black and white (bu dum ksh) as these posters truly believe it is

My point of contention is not "let's ignore that these riots are happening." I don't think anyone here thinks that burning down a Quick Trip is the ideal reaction to a perceived injustice perpetrated by those who are supposed to protect and serve. But the main thing that bothers me is -- and I'm not saying it's necessarily occurring in this thread in as much as it's something I notice on things like my Facebook feed or in comment sections (I live in the St. Louis area) -- that it becomes regarded as almost the official black reaction to the shooting. For instance, someone expresses grief at the young man who was killed, and the retort is "oh, but it's ok when people loot and riot!?" Even worse is when the event that sparked the rioting is ignored entirely in favor of just focusing on the "angry black thugs" narrative of reporting rioting as the real story here.
 

Siegcram

Member
a disproportionate amount of black on white crime occurs daily compared to white on black crime and your same "system" covers that up as well. shit goes both ways my man
Do you have any sources for this? The last one I saw who tried this line of argument linked to a white supremacist study.
 

Bradlums

Member
My point of contention is not "let's ignore that these riots are happening." I don't think anyone here thinks that burning down a Quick Trip is the ideal reaction to a perceived injustice perpetrated by those who are supposed to protect and serve. But the main thing that bothers me is -- and I'm not saying it's necessarily occurring in this thread in as much as it's something I notice on things like my Facebook feed or in comment sections (I live in the St. Louis area) -- that it becomes regarded as almost the official black reaction to the shooting. For instance, someone expresses grief at the young man who was killed, and the retort is "oh, but it's ok when people loot and riot!?" Even worse is when the event that sparked the rioting is ignored entirely in favor of just focusing on the "angry black thugs" narrative of reporting rioting as the real story here.

I highly doubt this initial shooting will go ignored. If anything, main stream media will focus more on the initial shootings than the riots, but that's just my guess
 

Jado

Banned
Let me rephrase, not everyone, just some *cough* sea manky *cough*

*cough* Stop *cough* doing this stupid *cough* thing.

You came into the thread undermining everyone's posts and now you're continuing to evoke "white guilt." I'm neither black nor white, but hispanic. Do I have "brown guilt" for having empathy and understanding with the victim and the people who looted out of frustration? Really, what a piece of shit thing for you to say that people are only responding to this out of your assumptions of racial guilt.
 

Bradlums

Member
Holy shit..we just went through this yesterday. A perfect circle.
Do you have any sources for this? The last one I saw who tried this line of argument linked to a white supremacist study.

http://www.examiner.com/article/federal-statistics-of-black-on-white-violence-with-links-and-mathematical-extrapolation-formulas

"Blacks are 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against whites then vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit a robbery."
 
Just saw this video retweeted that features a guy that claims to be an eyewitness. Mentions Brown was on his knees with his hands in the air when the cop shot him in the head, and then shot 4 more times. I should note that this video is NSFW due to language.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tfy5FiqzWHI&sns=em

It's a side note, but TIL that people in St Louis really do say 'hurr.' I thought that was a gimmick Nelly made up in the 90's. That's what I've heard dudes from St Louis say (other rappers, even. I guess they were jealous of his success?).
 

Mr. Patch

Member
a disproportionate amount of black on white crime occurs daily compared to white on black crime and your same "system" covers that up as well. shit goes both ways my man

Black on white crime is covered up by the system? Hahahahaha

I can smell the white supremacist logic through the screen.
 

Bradlums

Member
*cough* Stop *cough* doing this stupid *cough* thing.

You came into the thread undermining everyone's posts and now you're continuing to evoke "white guilt." I'm neither black nor white, but hispanic. Do I have "brown guilt" for having empathy and understanding with the victim and the people who looted out of frustration? Really, what a piece of shit thing for you to say that people are only responding to this out of your assumptions of racial guilt.

and all you're doing is committing ad-hominem. please quote me before you attack my personal character

Black on white crime is covered up by the system? Hahahahaha

I can smell the white supremacist logic through the screen.

look up two posts there, mate
 
D

Deleted member 47027

Unconfirmed Member
ncKryfO.png

67c2P3v.png

iJ2C1YD.png

EGoXmkt.png
 

marrec

Banned
My point of contention is not "let's ignore that these riots are happening." I don't think anyone here thinks that burning down a Quick Trip is the ideal reaction to a perceived injustice perpetrated by those who are supposed to protect and serve. But the main thing that bothers me is -- and I'm not saying it's necessarily occurring in this thread in as much as it's something I notice on things like my Facebook feed or in comment sections (I live in the St. Louis area) -- that it becomes regarded as almost the official black reaction to the shooting. For instance, someone expresses grief at the young man who was killed, and the retort is "oh, but it's ok when people loot and riot!?" Even worse is when the event that sparked the rioting is ignored entirely in favor of just focusing on the "angry black thugs" narrative of reporting rioting as the real story here.

Yep, this is my main concern with the aftermath. People who don't want to face the truth of WHY the riots happened in the first place and instead want to use it as a full stop to the conversation.
 

Sub_Level

wants to fuck an Asian grill.
My point of contention is not "let's ignore that these riots are happening." I don't think anyone here thinks that burning down a Quick Trip is the ideal reaction to a perceived injustice perpetrated by those who are supposed to protect and serve. But the main thing that bothers me is -- and I'm not saying it's necessarily occurring in this thread in as much as it's something I notice on things like my Facebook feed or in comment sections (I live in the St. Louis area) -- that it becomes regarded as almost the official black reaction to the shooting. For instance, someone expresses grief at the young man who was killed, and the retort is "oh, but it's ok when people loot and riot!?" Even worse is when the event that sparked the rioting is ignored entirely in favor of just focusing on the "angry black thugs" narrative of reporting rioting as the real story here.

Should there be another thread? The victim's family has gone on the record distancing themselves from this. Seems like rioting has the potential to happen again later today if things get out of control, and there is also the fallout of the businesses destroyed and the subsequent investigation/apprehension of any looters they can pin down if the PD even has those kinds of resources to spare right now.
 
I see the merits of Battersea's points, he put it quite well. But at the same time, people should not be outraged when law enforcement take action against said rioting. People start stealing and burning shit, yea shit's gonna go down

in other words, there is STILL a lot of misplaced white quilt in this thread

Stop using this word, it makes you sound remedial as fuck and it makes your agenda clear as fucking day. Just stop posting, go make a thread expressing how you really feel about black people and stop shitting up this one with your covert bullshit.

a disproportionate amount of black on white crime occurs daily compared to white on black crime and your same "system" covers that up as well. shit goes both ways my man

For someone who apparently took sociology classes and the like you sure are absolutely fucking clueless. We also had another member equally dumb use this same tired argument in this very fucking thread.
 

Bradlums

Member
Now, do you know WHY that is? Or we are all perfect and treated as equals in America, right?

yes, incredibly statistically significant figures are completely thrown out the window because of systematic oppression. 39 times more likely really means nothing to you?
 

mre

Golden Domers are chickenshit!!
Care to point where in the legal system it says that the penalty for assault is death?
The issue isn't whether the law allows for lethal force in this situation. As has been pointed out, Missouri law authorizes the police to use all necessary force to effect the detention of a "fleeing felon," (and someone who assaulted a police officer in Missouri is a felony) and provides for a rebuttable presumption that the amount of force exercised by the police officer is reasonable. I'll happily provide a citation for that if you like.

So the issue isn't whether or not Missouri law allows for lethal force in situations where someone has allegedly committed assault and is fleeing police officers. The issue is why do we authorize our police officers the discretion to exercise lethal force in situations like this (where the suspect is not known to be armed) in the first place?
 

As I said before, peaceful protests are only effective when you have a functioning government. It's the height of cruelty to admonish people for resorting to violence, while ignoring the violence they're responding to, and demanding that they only engage in predefined "acceptable" forms of peaceful protest - all the while knowing that said forms of protest will be banned by the state.

It would be much more honest to simply say, 'do nothing and accept your fate'.

So a cop shouted "Bring it on, you fucking animals" during the peaceful protest.

#notallcops tho

Egging people on in the hope that they react so the cop can justify killing them?

It seems to be lost in the riot narrative that the police provoked the rioters. As we saw, even the initial peaceful protest was met with lines of cops and attack dogs.

Just saw this video retweeted that features a guy that claims to be an eyewitness. Mentions Brown was on his knees with his hands in the air when the cop shot him in the head, and then shot 4 more times. I should note that this video is NSFW due to language.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tfy5FiqzWHI&sns=em

Holy shit.
 
http://www.examiner.com/article/federal-statistics-of-black-on-white-violence-with-links-and-mathematical-extrapolation-formulas

"Blacks are 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against whites then vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit a robbery."
"Statistics From My Ass".

Have fun in that swamp dude.

Now, do you know WHY that is? Or we are all perfect and treated as equals in America, right?
Those statistics aren't even accurate; I would not waste my time with them (or him) if I were you.

Wow, nice job finding exactly the white supremacist study I was talking about. You're not so smart, are you?
I had a feeling of such.
 

andycapps

Member
you are correct. the people approaching said problem with said approach are not guilty of white guilt. that does not encompass everyone in this thread though. some people here are not only saying it's reflexive to riot, but that people SHOULD be looting and fucking shit up in general to just stir the pot. because white america has had it coming for so long

Well sure, not everyone agrees with how things should be done. This goes back to MLK and Malcolm X.

a disproportionate amount of black on white crime occurs daily compared to white on black crime and your same "system" covers that up as well. shit goes both ways my man

Even if this is true, what the hell does it have to do with anything?
 

Jaeger

Member
yes, incredibly statistically significant figures are completely thrown out the window because of systematic oppression. 39 times more likely really means nothing to you?

I don't even know what you are even fucking asking. It's clear how you feel. That's fine. Land of the free (yea fucking right).
 

Brakke

Banned
So the issue isn't whether or not Missouri law allows for lethal force in situations where someone has allegedly committed assault and is fleeing police officers. The issue is why do we authorize our police officers the discretion to exercise lethal force in situations like this (where the suspect is not known to be armed) in the first place?

Take it one further in this case: the suspect was known to not be armed.
 

mre

Golden Domers are chickenshit!!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom