One is temporary.![]()
And, uh, which is which?
One is temporary.![]()
And, uh, which is which?
yeah. I was at the petco off of Eager Rd. I didnt even know about the Galleria until I was checking out and overheard somebody talking about it. Then at the gas station I heard some cops talking to the workers about how they had told a bunch of businesses in the area that it would be in their best interest to close for the night.
No. Perhaps you can find me an example of an occupying army in the world - and then find me the parallels across the United States that mimic the occupying army.
I found no examples.You seem pretty intelligent and can do your own research. Like I said, the comparison isn't as far fetched as you seem to think and I stand by that.
Why are you putting injustices in scare quotes?Until you remove humanity out of the picture, there will always be "injustices."
I found no examples.
Encompasses all the subjective and objective violations of actions contrary to one's views.Why are you putting injustices in scare quotes?
Being from Kansas and seeing people like Westboro protesting funerals, their counter protests, and abortion clinic protests, there sure as hell are protests met with displays of similar force.Would people start rioting if prayer vigils weren't met with swat gear and dogs? Are people more or less likely to riot when their public grief is met with "GET BACK!", "GO THERE!", "NOT HERE!" from people in the same uniform that brought about the tragedy in the first place?
Shit, people destroy property to get to the hottest item on the black friday sale annually.
I meant that the London riots were off-topic, sorry for the confusion.
My point about the young lad was that there is no good press to come out of riots, they interview the people who are opportunistic as that makes for a better story. Also, I did not deny that the riot would be a direct result of Michael's death. I do, however, fail to see how rioting, the likely the destruction of innocent people's property, spreading fear and the inevitable looting that comes along with it would not help any cause that you wish to represent.
If you disagree, tell me how it's advantageous to the cause.
One is temporary.
I have plenty of real life experience, actually.Sounds like you should move to the hood then. Nothing beats real life experience.
I hope everyone there stays safe tonight. Sounds like the police are more prepared tonight.
The riots will do in the media what they have done to this thread. Overshadow the killing of Michael.
I have plenty of real life experience, actually.
I believe One is natural order of complete control where the other occurs from disaster conditions where societal order has fallen apart.
Hmm? Your inquiry was answered - to what manner are you still confused? Perhaps you can use this opportunity to explain the relevance to such a distinction in relation to the disheartening death of this adult?So no answer then. Alright.
You didn't answer the question. Your explaining what you think makes them happen, not why they are different.
I have plenty of real life experience, actually.
It does make sense, I realise that it is a very tense time that we live in but the cycle of violence needs to stop somewhere and justice is not instantaneous. I hope justice is served, I'm sure there's not one person here that wouldn't want to see it but I do worry that riots could jeopardise justice somewhat.Ohh 😅
Advantageous? Only in that things could be worse. I prefer peaceful protest, wait, no I prefer justice foremost. Then peaceful protest, but riots are better than war. And the ease of arms in the country coupled with the civil unrest, heightened racial tensions, and wealth inequality could easily start an inferno. Riots aren't quite up to "spark" level. Make sense?
There are times where I get to hear about those who believe the CIA is out to get them, and that the entire system is out to undermine them - or my personal favorite, chips implanted to control their thoughts. Outlandish mantra typically gets swept under the rug since I get to hear about it rather frequently.But apparently not enough to see how someone could view the police as an occupying army without being dismissive about it.
These terms are too generalizing and only serve to reinforce particular stereotypes.Yes, because rioting makes the 'black community' seem so much better to 'middle America' and there is absolutely no way that the media wouldn't portray it as a heroic stand against oppression.
Rioting wont solve shit, it'll make it worse.
It does make sense, I realise that it is a very tense time that we live in but the cycle of violence needs to stop somewhere and justice is not instantaneous. I hope justice is served, I'm sure there's not one person here that wouldn't want to see it but I do worry that riots could jeopardise justice somewhat.
There are times where I get to hear about those who believe the CIA is out to get them, and that the entire system is out to undermine them - or my personal favorite, chips implanted to control their thoughts. Outlandish mantra typically gets swept under the rug since I get to hear about it rather frequently.
Makes them happen? No, but a police state is a government which aims to control the populace through coercion and force (is a permenant construct). Martial law would come at the result of disaster where the municipality ceases to function and only the National Guard can keep the peace. (Temporary until the municipal government is restored)You didn't answer the question. Your explaining what you think makes them happen, not why they are different.
There are times where I get to hear about those who believe the CIA is out to get them, and that the entire system is out to undermine them - or my personal favorite, chips implanted to control their thoughts. Outlandish mantra typically gets swept under the rug since I get to hear about it rather frequently.
https://vine.co/v/MYZZKaHFvr6
Be prepared to get gassed.
Next area - the loop and Hampton village. Might be trolls. Stay safe STL GAF!
I was not equating such.How does one equate police brutality and harassment against minority groups (which has been well documented) to micro chip conspiracy theories?
Makes them happen? No, but a police state is a government which aims to control the populace through coercion and force (is a permenant construct). Martial law would come at the result of disaster where the municipality ceases to function and only the National Guard can keep the peace. (Temporary until the municipal government is restored)
I have no doubt that a percentage of American cops are cruel, aggressive people. There's far too many videos, reports and news stories for me to be able to deny that but once again I cannot support rioting.Real talk. It would take a real jackass to deny Mike justice because of the riots. Especially when the police caused this. There have been postings in this thread about people being provoked by officers screaming obscenities, but even should you choose to ignore that as hearsay, the pictures of them bringing out the dogs is damning enough. This causation only flows one way.
Oh and the riots do have one small positive. It makes this a much bigger story.
Yes but your definition of 'studying up' is very different from your average Fox News viewer, the people who would buy this 'black community riot!' 'black people are thugs' rhetoric the fucking second a riot starts. I do not mean to generalise massive groups but it does help the ease of communicating what I'm trying to discuss. People will not walk in each other's shoes in this instance and most people will feel no sympathy for rioters. You may, I may, most of 'Gaf may but I would disagree that most of America may.These terms are too generalizing and only serve to reinforce particular stereotypes.
The truth of the matter is, there are many subs of the Black community and the lower half of Middle America is on the verge of falling into what used to be the "low income" status, if it hasn't already. They might want to study up on what's happening b/c it'll be getting rougher going forward and the problems will spread outward.
They say the best way to understand another person is to walk their shoes. Lots of people who never imagined they would, are going to be walking the shoes of these rioters sooner or later (that isn't to say they're literally going to riot. Hopefully not.)
No, there is quite the difference especially in relation to world usage and American Constitutional law/opinion. Still trying to understand the relevance to the article at hand though.So what you are saying is the only difference is intent. One is permanent and the other is temporary. So really there's no difference at all then in your mind.
Or because he assaulted an officer while struggling over the officer's gun.
A witness provides a very very different account of what happened:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfy5FiqzWHI&sns=em&app=desktop
Considering how often officers lie about violent altercations, I'm not inclined to believe the "official" statement.
Im here in STL and Riots are resuming I am waiting for shit to go down.
No, there is quite the difference especially in relation to world usage and American Constitutional law/opinion. Still trying to understand the relevance to the article at hand though.
I was not equating such.
Because we can generalize the actions of one to the actions of hundreds of thousands while, at the same time, generalizing among the tens of millions of contacts every year with LEOs. Right?
Seems pretty tame compared to yesterdayI am too. And no, they're not really. Just a few pockets of activity. Nothing major.
Nah, police departments nationwide have been proven to be corrupt nationwide, top to bottom, root and stem.
The "few bad apples" argument has to be retired, or we have to come up with a new definition for the word 'few':
Farrar and his small police force have become the poster boys of body-worn cameras...
...the year-long trial period ending in February saw an 88 percent drop in complaints against police and a 60 percent reduction in uses of force by the police. And these steep declines occurred even though the cameras were in use only about half the time.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/08/nypd-cameras-rialto-farrar-bloomberg.html
In 2011, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 685,724 times.
605,328 were totally innocent (88 percent).
350,743 were black (53 percent).
223,740 were Latino (34 percent).
61,805 were white (9 percent).
341,581 were aged 14-24 (51 percent).
http://www.nyclu.org/content/stop-and-frisk-data
The Los Angeles Police Commission is investigating how half of the recording antennas in the Southeast Division went missing, seemingly as a way to evade new self-monitoring procedures that the Los Angeles Police Department imposed last year.
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/lapd-cops-disabling-recorders-cops-either-them/
There were 10,000 abuse complaints filed against the Chicago PD between 2002 and 2004
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/seven-reasons-police-brutality-is-systematic-not-anecdotal/
Criticisms against the entire police force are not generalizations, they are backed by empirical data.
Nah, police departments nationwide have been proven to be corrupt nationwide, top to bottom, root and stem.
The "few bad apples" argument has to be retired, or we have to come up with a new definition for the word 'few':
Farrar and his small police force have become the poster boys of body-worn cameras...
...the year-long trial period ending in February saw an 88 percent drop in complaints against police and a 60 percent reduction in uses of force by the police. And these steep declines occurred even though the cameras were in use only about half the time.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/08/nypd-cameras-rialto-farrar-bloomberg.html
In 2011, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 685,724 times.
605,328 were totally innocent (88 percent).
350,743 were black (53 percent).
223,740 were Latino (34 percent).
61,805 were white (9 percent).
341,581 were aged 14-24 (51 percent).
http://www.nyclu.org/content/stop-and-frisk-data
The Los Angeles Police Commission is investigating how half of the recording antennas in the Southeast Division went missing, seemingly as a way to evade new self-monitoring procedures that the Los Angeles Police Department imposed last year.
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/lapd-cops-disabling-recorders-cops-either-them/
There were 10,000 abuse complaints filed against the Chicago PD between 2002 and 2004
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/seven-reasons-police-brutality-is-systematic-not-anecdotal/
Criticisms against the entire police force are not generalizations, they are backed by empirical data.
I expect many different accounts from witnesses. I'm sure at this stage of the game with the media attention that turning to "youtube" might not be the wisest avenue to take.A witness provides a very very different account of what happened:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfy5FiqzWHI&sns=em&app=desktop
Considering how often officers lie about violent altercations, I'm not inclined to believe the "official" statement.
Yes but your definition of 'studying up' is very different from your average Fox News viewer
People will not walk in each other's shoes in this instance and most people will feel no sympathy for rioters. You may, I may, most of 'Gaf may but I would disagree that most of America may.
I don't hope for revolution, I don't hope for people 'studying up', I hope for people to do the best that they can in the context of the culture, situation and possible aftermath of a situation like this.
Seriously, what the FUCK are you talking about? A kid got executed by a COP, people hold a vigil and more COPS come to display more force.Being from Kansas and seeing people like Westboro protesting funerals, their counter protests, and abortion clinic protests, there sure as hell are protests met with displays of similar force.
So police in 3 of the largest cities = all police are corrupt? OK.
Oh, and this video is from St. Louis, cops threatening to arrest a man if he doesn't plant a gun on somebody else
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5B6FK3lXc
Makes you wonder how many other guys are sitting in prison right now because they didn't / couldn't record these intimidation tactics. I don't trust cops, and that's because of how my friends and I have been treated by them in the past, ran into far more dickheads than good cops.