A You can't have one without the other. It's just not possible. There's no real way to prove this to as you seem to not want to understand the concept of dualism.
Way to sleaze over my post. I've been saying in this thread that there are negative aspects to all descriptors. It's not possible all are all inclusive and positive 100%. The exotic negatives are small. The positives are more neutral-good because it's interchangeable.
B It is also perfectly reasonable for someone in White Horse to find Eygptians exotic. How you don't see how exotic is relative is beyond me.
A If beauty is dualistic, then disprove my statement:
There are 5 paintings in the world. These are the only 5 paintings that have ever existed. All 5 of them are beautiful.
Or this rhetorical:
Do you love your mother? Did you need to hate something else to know you loved her?
B But it's just not true. You seem to believe that all these terms have dualistic properties, but that's just utterly false. If you think it's not then prove it to me. You haven't done that.
Because that ethnic Egyptian just might be a Canadian citizen. And when your bumpkin from White Horse calls that person "exotic" he is implying that he himself is the real Canadian, not the other.
But you know. Keep going with it. Some people don't mind, but others will think you're a bigot. Like it or not it's the cold truth.