Ferguson: Police Officer Kills 18yo Michael Brown; Protests/Riots Continue

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's a thing with some of the pro-Wilson protesters explaining themselves:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimdalrympleii/why-darren-wilson-supporters-are-rallying-in-st-louis
“He deserves to be innocent until proven guilty.” — Sara Wilson

The call for due process was a common one at the rally, and Sara Wilson (who is not related to Darren) said almost no one is “seeking justice” for Darren. Sara Wilson added that Darren had been “crucified” before the facts had come out.

...

“It seems kind of one-sided. I mean the other side’s already got him convicted and he hasn’t had a say.” — Louie Puder

Many at the rally, including Puder, were frustrated by the media coverage of Brown’s death and the ensuing fallout. Puder said Brown may have been unarmed, but “he’s six foot four, 300 plus pounds, that’s a pretty lethal weapon there.”

Puder wore a blue shirt with a police-style logo printed on the front. It was common attire Sunday in St. Louis; the shirts were a fundraiser, and in the back of the bar near a pool table organizers Sunday were busy ironing logos on more shirts to meet high demand. Despite the ongoing DIY operation, the shirts still sold out, several attendees said.

...

“We’re out here to support Darren Wilson because he don’t have a voice.” — Ed Chambers

Chambers and others at the rally said that Wilson had been driven into hiding by threats and fears for his safety. “He’s in hiding and that’s not right,” Chambers said. “That’s why we’re out here.” Chambers also agreed with others at the rally who said Brown was the aggressor. “There’s evidence showing that it’s more in support of the officer,” he said.
 
I counted 11 shots. 5 shots after the pause (two were really close together). Dude who live tweeted the shooting counted 5 after Brown was surrendering.

Edit: Might have been six. I can't fully tell.
 
I counted 11 shots. 5 shots after the pause (two were really close together). Dude who live tweeted the shooting counted 5 after Brown was surrendering.

That would match up with the math of 5 wounds to the front and one wound either to the front or back.
 
Yes, and the evidence does support him.

I guessing though that his first few shots missed. That stopped Brown in his tracks and he turned around.

This audio would seem to confirm that more than 7 shots (6 that hit brown and one during the struggle in the car) were fired though.
I obviously super cynical about everything coming from that camp at this point but I can't be the only one that noticed that we heard nothing from anyone trying to explain what happened from the officers point of view until after the private autopsy report was in the media.

It's pretty easy to make evidence support your story when you don't tell it until after you see the evidence.

I'm sure there's a lot more that can be collected from the clothing and street that will provide a clearer picture but I'm still not sure why the several eye witnesses are being ignored. Aren't there at least 4 who all said they saw him with his hands up? Were they all imagining things, all lying or did none of them notice Mike Brown going crazy and charging headlong into bullets?
 
Here's a thing with some of the pro-Wilson protesters explaining themselves:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimdalrympleii/why-darren-wilson-supporters-are-rallying-in-st-louis

Fucking.

Amazing.

All of those quotes are fucking Onion-level.

“He deserves to be innocent until proven guilty.” — Sara Wilson
He fucking killed someone. He's guilty of that. Regardless of the nature of the shooting, he fucking killed someone.

“It was derailed with race. Michael Brown could have been white. It didn’t matter, Darren Wilson was doing his job.” — Mary Kourik
He fucking killed someone. It doesn't matter what race. It shouldn't. His job is not to execute people whenever he feels like it.

“It seems kind of one-sided. I mean the other side’s already got him convicted and he hasn’t had a say.” — Louie Puder
I'm sounding like a broken record at this point.

“We’re out here to support Darren Wilson because he don’t have a voice.” — Ed Chambers
The only reason he doesn't have a voice is because he is in fucking hiding. It's not like he's dead. Why are you treating it like he is the one that got killed?
 
Fucking.

Amazing.

All of those quotes are fucking Onion-level.

“He deserves to be innocent until proven guilty.” — Sara Wilson
He fucking killed someone. He's guilty of that. Regardless of the nature of the shooting, he fucking killed someone.

“It was derailed with race. Michael Brown could have been white. It didn’t matter, Darren Wilson was doing his job.” — Mary Kourik
He fucking killed someone. It doesn't matter what race. It shouldn't. His job is not to execute people whenever he feels like it.

“It seems kind of one-sided. I mean the other side’s already got him convicted and he hasn’t had a say.” — Louie Puder
I'm sounding like a broken record at this point.

“We’re out here to support Darren Wilson because he don’t have a voice.” — Ed Chambers
The only reason he doesn't have a voice is because he is in fucking hiding. It's not like he's dead. Why are you treating it like he is the one that got killed?

Don't you know? When your attorney tells you to shut up and not talk to the media because you shot someone to death, that's exactly like being dead.

edit:
I think I might be hearing an echo for one.

Could be--I'm still uncertain of the total number (that first volley is difficult for me), but the second volley seems pretty clear after listening to it a couple times.
 
Innocent until proven guilty is something I always believe in and until Wilson is found guilty I won't presume anything. However, something tells me those people are being biased with their use of "innocent until proven guilty" and that's wrong.

It should always be the case. Not just when it suits your interests.

In fairness I will say that some people have already decided Wilson's shooting was unjustified and while it may look one way I don't think we should jump to conclusions until people who have access to all the evidence make a decision.
 
''innocent until proven guilty''

oh, the irony
Innocent until proven guilty is something I always believe in and until Wilson is found guilty I won't presume anything. However, something tells me those people are being biased with their use of "innocent until proven guilty" and that's wrong.

It should always be the case. Not just when it suits your interests.
Wilson needs to be judged by twelve, Brown was carried by six.
 
Innocent until proven guilty is something I always believe in and until Wilson is found guilty I won't presume anything. However, something tells me those people are being biased with their use of "innocent until proven guilty" and that's wrong.

It should always be the case. Not just when it suits your interests.

In fairness I will say that some people have already decided Wilson's shooting was unjustified and while it may look one way I don't think we should jump to conclusions until people who have access to all the evidence make a decision.

I understand the need to be proven guilty.

But right now, actions are speaking louder than words.
 
Its a good thing that guy on the audio was closer to the begging of his "conversation" rather than the ending. Of all the people, doing all the things someone could be doing, it had to be that guy at that moment, doing that.

I can't wait for all of the pieces to officially fall into place concerning what went down for sure. No matter what the 100% truth is, I just want to hear it.
 
Bv71Y68IcAAld_A.jpg


Michael Brown's father at his funeral
...

How can someone as a father donate to a man for killing another mans son? People protesting for Darren Wilson are so inhumane..
 
Bv71Y68IcAAld_A.jpg


Michael Brown's father at his funeral
...

How can someone as a father donate to a man for killing another mans son? People protesting for Darren Wilson are so inhumane..

Heartwrenching. I can't imagine how he must feel. Does anyone know why the media were present at such a private and intimate affair like a funeral?
 
that picture is so brutal :\

the sorrow and the helplessness and the rage of having your son taken from you like that.

Heartwrenching. I can't imagine how he must feel. Does anyone know why the media were present at such a private and intimate affair like a funeral?

it wasn't private. The whole public was invited. Supporters and anyone else. They put the protest on hold for the memorial service.
everything else has been so public, the world can see this too.
 
That's so sad :( why would somebody even take pictures at a funeral?

at major public event funerals its a common thing, especially when media coverage and public interaction are involved.

edit: just listened to the audio recording of the shooting. they really need to just move things along. I have no confidence in the Ferguson PD, so I'd really like some direct oversight of the investigation. fuck your turf and your rep. Your PD is the refuge of all the law enforcement rejects of the metropolitan area? You don't get the benefit of doubt. Not on a race case when too many of your own officers have racial fuckups on their records.
 
that picture is so brutal :\

the sorrow and the helplessness and the rage of having your son taken from you like that.



it wasn't private. The whole public was invited. Supporters and anyone else. They put the protest on hold for the memorial service.
everything else has been so public, the world can see this too.

Who invited them, the Brown family?
 
Is this a common thing in the US? I can't imagine going to such an event, let alone attending it for my son.

well they took donations to afford the funeral, plus they have many unrelated public citizens among the supporters who may want to pay their respects. This is something like a state funeral for a private citizen, instead of lying in state in a government building, the funeral is open for public viewing.
 
What are the odds on if Wilson gets indicted and especially if found guilty those pro-Wilson people will continue to claim he's innocent but was if "victim" of political pressure?
 
If the evidence is completely damning, they'll still say he was afraid for his life and under stress. It depends on what happened during the first few shots. How close they were to each other, whether or not Michael actually even touched him, etc. Right now there's a lot of flack and hearsay, so people really just want to see the facts of the investigation. (contrary to what a lot of people say, this is about justice, not hating on poor innocent police who wouldn't hurt a fly. It looks like a crime has been committed, and we want to see people held responsible.)
 
What are the odds on if Wilson gets indicted and especially if found guilty those pro-Wilson people will continue to claim he's innocent but was if "victim" of political pressure?

The trick is not minding when they do that. It's to be expected that ignorant people stick to their guns no matter how much we expose their ignorance.
 
that audio...god

yeah that doesn't sound like a close range scuffle over a firearm, with 5-6 shots being fired immediately. That was the original story.

Then you have Micheal superman punching Officer Wilson through his car window like Goku and running off.

so now what do the friends of Officer Wilson have to say, I wonder?
 
yeah that doesn't sound like a close range scuffle over a firearm, with 5-6 shots being fired immediately. That was the original story.

Then you have Micheal superman punching Officer Wilson through his car window like Goku and running off.

so now what do the friends of Officer Wilson have to say, I wonder?

"Wait for the facts."

"Too soon to say. "

"He feared for his life. "

This will change nothing for people that already believe otherwise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom