Sony has bundles and other stuff for that game.Next? lol
pic
Even if they didn't pay for parity, most here wouldn't believe, there's really nothing they can do to proof otherwise.As stated, I wonder if MS had something to do with this?
Would MS really sink that low?
I'm not a fan of MS, but if this is on them, I would be surprised.
Sadly.It won't and it won't.
I always kind of liked Ubisoft as a Publisher, contrary to the general opinion, and I always loved AC (even after Ezio...), but I really disrespect this decision.
I'm confuse. They did 900p on xone but they can't reach 1080p on ps4 for the CPU. Isn't it the ps4 gpu more powerful compared the xone for same percentage necessary to achieve 1080p? Resolution on xone should be even lower of 900p if the game it's really CPU limited. Or maybe xone has secretly a powerful CPU.They arent 'code translators', as far as I know.
I will. Gameplay, the story, and the graphics still looking as good as e3/gamescom will always matter much more to me than the resolution, or parity. But then again my words will probably be disregarded considering the tag underneath my name. >.>Getting this game used for sure. Who is actually going to buy the game new on PS4? Just wondering.
That's all well and good on a personal level, but 1080p should have been the absolute uncompromised standard this generation to match 1:1 pixel distribution with 1080p TVs that have been sold since 2004. And while I admire that in your mind its just "numbers" there is a real, tangible difference between the two that comes down to more than just "180 lines".
Has anybody at all suggested anything like this?
They are CPU bound so that could explain the limitation on the PS4 as well...
I agree that the statement is terrible, but perhaps the goal of running the game at 1080p with all the bells and whistles has proven impossible, even on the most powerful of the two consoles.
This game has a marketing deal with MS?
I hope nobody. I hope it fucking bombs on PS4 and it wakes this industry the fuck up.
So how many upset people are going to buy it anyway? Every time I see posters boycotting a company, the next week most are playing the game.
Will be interesting to see what's left in the PC files this time around.
Next? lol
![]()
Lets be honest- if this game reviews well most people on here claiming they won't buy it will probably buy it. They may even type out on the review thread "so conflicted guys! I want to play this game but also don't want to support forced parity!" as they are in line at Gamestop.
Canceled.
Maybe PC Version.
I think this is an interesting point of view. It would imply that developers are using PS4 sales to subsidize XO development. If true, it might be a good business decision, to have sales across two platforms instead of just one.Does this mean my PS4 versionwill be a fraction of the price of other platforms because less time was spent developing the PS4 version?that I'm not going to buy
I have assumed it took less time to get the PS4 version to its current state.
Welp, Ubi just saved me $60
But if the X1 can run it fluently at 900p, then PS4 could run it at 1080p, or at a higher refresh rate, so if we assume the game will look identical regarding texture, effect amount/resolution than PS4 is underutilized.
Yeah, all games from Ubisoft
By that reasoning how do we know some Marketing deals with Sony havent gimped the xbox one to have lower resolution/frame rates? It doesnt make sense for MS to pay for something like this when the Resolution and Framerate issue is not something that will make the game sell considerable more in Xbox One or Considerable less in PS4.If a co-marketing deal actively harms the experience of the game on another platform, then it's something people will detest.
Ubisoft's wording states that they are holding back the PS4 version just so it doesn't surpass the Xbone version. Due to the marketing deal with MS, the implications that this change is the outcome of the marketing deal are certainly there.
Exclusive content is fine since it's just side activities that don't affect the overall story or just new outfits. Timed exclusive DLC is fine since it will come to the other platform. But limiting the game on another platform it could have looked much better on because of parity? Not good at all. I bought the most powerful console so I can have the best looking games and don't want to have them watered down in the name of parity (money).
So... I wonder what the PR retraction will be.
Option 1: "PR mis-spoke. PS4 version is not at 900p/30fps for parity, we couldn't make it run any better"
Option 2: "We are doing this for the gamers. We don't think any gamer should get an inferior version just because they bought a different console"
Option 3: "Resolution isn't set in stone yet for these platforms, we are still in active development." Followed by complete silence. Followed by DF analysis post-launch showing nothing changed.
I'm putting my money on Option 2.
People still haven't read the damn quote fully
CPU BOUND REFERS TO FRAMERATE, NOT RESOLUTION.
(Will buy used after trading in black flag)/10
Next? lol
![]()
Yeah, all games from Ubisoft