Such fucking bullshit.
I can now see other devs/publishers doing this. Especially if AC:U sells well regardless.
Disrespect for the consumers all around.
Uncommon, sure, but it has happened. Most recent that I can remember is Watch Dogs... another UBI game.
Where do I tweet on it to post a comment?
In Watch dogs, it was the best they could do, not the same thing at all.
If this game is 900p on the PS4, it better have the cleanest AA possible with the remaining overhead, and a decent level of AF and overall effects, like higher quality motion blur, high res textures, greater draw distance etc. If they've limited the PS4 version to the same as the Xbox One's 900p, they need to get rid of the high level of aliasing currently visible in all the Xbox One footage of gameplay. Still annoyed it's not going to be 1080p due to intentional limitation though. Looks like exclusives are going to be the far better deal this gen.
Sony needs to take a page from Microsoft's playbook and start pressuring publishers to take full advantage of the Ps4's hardware. I think it is lame to ever put such pressure on any developer, but Sony should not bring a knife to a gun fight. They made a better machine and they shouldn't allow Microsoft to try and rob them of that advantage through bullshittery like this.
It should also have a smoother framerate. What we saw and heard about today is pretty choppy.
0:24 on that though...hahahahahahahhaa
Cool, time to stop upgrading PC's you can still have fun at lower settings. Hope all companies lock their games at console settings, after all, you can still have fun.I promise you all. You can still have fun at 900p.
Yes, you would! In fact, we do! And this is why we have a problem.This is one of their biggest franchises, you would think they would make each version the best it could?
The worst part of this is we all know the PC port will be a complete train wreck. There's just no way to escape Ubisoft bullshit.
It should also have a smoother framerate. What we saw and heard about today is pretty choppy.
In Watch dogs, it was the best they could do, not the same thing at all.
![]()
edit - to lessen the confusion, this is true version![]()
Not sure how you're meant to improve on perfection but worth a try.
![]()
This Post Brought To You By the Microsoft Xbox One, The All-in-One Entertainment System
If this game is 900p on the PS4, it better have the cleanest AA possible with the remaining overhead, and a decent level of AF and overall effects, like higher quality motion blur, high res textures, greater draw distance etc. If they've limited the PS4 version to the same as the Xbox One's 900p, they need to get rid of the high level of aliasing currently visible in all the Xbox One footage of gameplay. Still annoyed it's not going to be 1080p due to intentional limitation though. Looks like exclusives are going to be the far better deal this gen.
I get that and understand that. But the guy I quoted said that he basically is entitled to all PS4 games to be 1080p because he spent $449 CA for it.
I have both systems and a very high end PC that I use at 4k, so believe me, I wish every game on every system would be 1080p. But realistically, there are going to be some games that are not.
Personally, I think the Xbox One and to a lesser degree the PS4 are under powered systems. I think the both should of been more powerful and be able to do more than what they currently showing. The "jump" was just not that substantial as they have in the past.
And you know that for sure?
Full HD towns man.How the hell did they go from targeting 1080p/60fps to 900p/30fps?!
Ubisoft just can't catch a break this gen...
Final Fantasy XIII has an OT, everything is possible.I wonder if there will even be an OT with as much hate GAF has for Ass Creed now lol
How is it not the same? Watch Dogs PS4 was 900p, AC:U PS4 is 900p. Two similar games with a 6 month period and they run at the same resolution and frame rate.
Full HD towns man.
They are hard.
There certainly was a debate over Destiny.
This is obviously a bit blunt, but this scenario seems very plausible to me, especially given MS's proclivity as of late for throwing money at developers to make the Xbone more enticing.Translated: "Microsoft paid a shitload of money to hide the fact their console is much worse"
Cool, time to stop upgrading PC's you can still have fun at lower settings. Hope all companies lock their games at console settings, after all, you can still have fun.
Honestly, your comment has to be a joke right?
Shouldn't people be pissed at Ubi? They have the final call as to let anyone grease their wheels. I for one am happy MSFT is putting up a fight even if it means them throwing money any way they can. The onus is on the developer/publisher to deny or accept monies. But I am also in the camp that has a PS4, Xbone and a Wii U. So I have the luxury of choice and don't have to be butthurt about this whole thing.This is obviously a bit blunt, but this scenario seems very plausible to me, especially given MS's proclivity as of late for throwing money at developers to make the Xbone more enticing.
Interesting, someone should dig further at that point.So, is Ubisoft saying that Bruno St-André was lying?
I wonder if there will even be an OT with as much hate GAF has for Ass Creed now lol
How the hell did they go from targeting 1080p/60fps to 900p/30fps?!
Ubisoft just can't catch a break this gen...
I wonder if there will even be an OT with as much hate GAF has for Ass Creed now lol