Pat's incessant whining about anything calling back to Dark Souls 1 is really starting to irk me. Some thing in 2 are understandable (namely Ornstein) but, christ, the bitching about the majestic greatsword, when the weapon isn't even that offensive at pushing the prequel is bothersome.
It's a shame that Pat is, seemingly, making all of Woolie's first impressions of everything "this isn't as good as Dark Souls 1" or "this is bad because it tries to use Dark Souls 1's lore". It's also a shame that he's probably going to extremely color Woolie's opinion of the Ivory Crown DLC because of that. The whole crux of the DLC is something about Dark Souls 1 and one of the cooler implementations (and reveals) of it. But Pat's already stated how much he hates it in a recent podcast which is probably just going to affect Woolie's opinion on it.
The game's a sequel. Let it borrow from the previous game. I don't see how a lot of those things are an issue. It's using a lot of previous lore to establish its own environments and story.