Digital Limit
Member
Gus from roosterteeth said this. Here is your source, hope it doesnt hurt your brain.
You don't have to be a dick about it. I've already watched this video and don't recall him confirming that ADS changes how accurate a weapon is. Have a timestamp? Everything I've seen is just people discussing reticles or how a weapon feels, and ADS will always make a weapon feel more accurate. Frankie says otherwise quite plainly, which is why I'm doubtful.
No crosshair bloom when using smart scope.
![]()
Crosshair bloom when using hip fire.
![]()
Think of it similar to no bloom DMR vs DMR w/ bloom in terms of how it functions. Since AR/SMG are close-range atuomatics, the bloom doesn't affect these weapons as much as the DMR in Reach (because it was long range single-shot).
The only evidence I've seen is people discussing reticles, such as what you posted. Do we know that the reticles represent a change in how the weapon functions?
Here's a thought, would the guys who are completely against this semi-faux ADS prefer not to have visible weapons at all? I mean some of the weapons are pretty big when just walking around. The sniper is huge.
I like seeing my weapon. It's a nice trade-off for power weapons and is immersive.