At the moment it's an AVB situation. His star player is gone and people don't know whether the boatload of new signings are actually players he wanted. It's hard to tell exactly what role he played in assembling this squad.
This is true, and like AVB I fear that sacking Rodgers won't solve the real problems in the team, it'll just be putting someone's head on a spike because someone's gotta take the blame.
I'm not married to the idea of Rodgers being our manager for years to come. If he gets sacked then so be it, onward and upward.
But putting Rodgers in the CL and taking away Suarez is like saying "okay, you did a great job in the last race. Try this race, it's even harder," then lopping one of your legs off. Lose Sturridge and that's a hammer in your other kneecap. Even a manager much better than Rodgers would really struggle with this.
Yes we did spend a lot of money with the Suarez income, but with a few exceptions they were essentially depth signings, and we needed depth desperately last year even when we had Suarez. Depth is why Man City won the title and why we lost it.
We need depth AND a replacement for Suarez. Look at that spending chart and see what teams can afford stuff like that. United are investing 190m in a marquee player with Di Maria and 103m for a player with a future ahead of him. Juan Mata was essentially a morale-instilling attempt and he cost ass loads too. United, City, Chelsea, Real, Barça, PSG can afford to buy depth and first team stars as well.
I would like to see us persist with Rodgers, because while the results are shocking at times I think we still show signs of playing good football, like against Man Utd which was encouraging if by nothing else than by the number of chances we had to score goals. We were undone by a great goalkeeper and some nervy finishing by a 19 year old winger being asked to play up front alone for the first time.