NoA: "there are more great games on Nintendo platforms than anywhere else!"

I am a littler confused, people are complaining that nintendo uses user scores, but doesn't it also say regular meta critic score of 85+? So what they're saying is professional reviewers and users agree this game is quality? In my opinion, this makes their claim more credible when both users and reviewers agree.
 
They actually included user scores bwahahaha

Well using user scores makes actually more sense than using the "review" scores done by "professional" sites like IGN, Polygon and so on, that are seeing "Oscar-caliber drama"s and are giving out 10/10 like candy as soon as the publisher orders a bit of ad-space on their site.

For quite a few games the user score makes way more sense than the "professional" "review" score. Just take a look at for example NieR.

And for the games Nintendo listed there isn't actually a huge difference between those "professional" reviews and the actual user reviews. At least for the Wii U side. I don't care enough to check the 3DS side.

Bayonetta 1 86 / 9.1
Bayonetta 2 91 / 9.1
Smash Bros 92 / 9.0
3D World 93 / 9.0
Mario Kart 88 / 9.1
Wind Waker 90 / 8.9
Rayman Legends 92 / 8.5
Pikmin 3 87 / 8.6
 
Anyone else find it BS Wii U gets a free pass for hiding behind another platform?

Paying a $1000 sure isn't going to make the PS4/XBO look less attractive when it does 1st party and 3rd party support for far less.
It's the "Nintendo" difference.

Nintendo also gets a free pass for doing the absolute minimum to support their consoles while 3rd parties get crucified for doing the same.

The Holy Church of Nintendo can do no wrong.

Nintendo didn't claim they could cure you of being a fanboy so I'm not sure what your post has to do with the thread.
The irony of this post.
 
List of games meeting the criteria, I'm counting 9 right now:

PlayStation 4:
The Last of Us Remastered (95 / 8.7)
Guilty Gear Xrd -SIGN- (86 / 8.5)

Xbox One:
None

PlayStation Vita:
Persona 4 Golden (93 / 9.3)
Rayman Origins (88 / 8.5)
Machinarium (88 / 8.5)
LittleBigPlanet PS Vita (88 / 8.8)
Rayman Legends (87 / 8.7) (probably not counted)
Tearaway (87 / 9.1)
Final Fantasy X / X-2 HD Remaster (86 / 8.6)

I guess we can blame PS/Xbox fanboys trolling each other.

Machinarium is not retail.
I mean, they didn't count Shovel Knight either.
 
I am a littler confused, people are complaining that nintendo uses user scores, but doesn't it also say regular meta critic score of 85+? So what they're saying is professional reviewers and users agree this game is quality? In my opinion, this makes their claim more credible when both users and reviewers agree.

Shhh, let them keep going.
 
Half of this sentence is BS and the other part doesn't make any sense.
I'll clarify, the Nintendo crowd is very lenient on Nintendo for allowing long droughts of games on their consoles. Meanwhile, they heavily criticize third party publishers for doing the same on Nintendo consoles.
 
Are you sure about that? Take a look back through this thread, or head over to the Game of the Year 2014 voting topic to see people having meltdowns over an influx of Bayonetta 2 votes.

GAF is a very different perspective over general gamers.

For example, GAF goes nuts over nostalgic things like if Crash would be returning....I could go on, you get the idea.

WiiU is not in the console race, its hardly on the radar - take a look through any console sales thread...its not competing at all.

Things like Bayonetta 2 etc are big with some very vocal but tiny slice of the gaming market - the game bombed.
 
How did a thread for such a straightforward ad work its way up to 17 pages? It's an ad. What else are they going to say?

If it's that upsetting for you, why don't you go fix Metacritic's user scores yourself?
 
Ummmmm what's the argument. It's true, so I fail to see what's got everyone up in arms.

You aren´t supposed to understand that the picture in the OP is just marketing material with handcrafted rules to make the advertised product look good.

You are meant to drag fanboy drivel like "the church of Nintendo" into this and assert that Nintendo fans are somehow hypocritical....or don´t even look at the picture in the OP and say " DISAGREE, system XYZ is far better !" .
 
"There are fewer good games on Nintendo consoles. Also fewer games in general. Hardware is underpowered as fuck. Buy a Wii U this Christmas!" - NOA
 
"There are fewer good games on Nintendo consoles. Also fewer games in general. Hardware is underpowered as fuck. Buy a Wii U this Christmas!" - NOA

was this joke or serious? the system is nice. I can't understand have people played all of the games already mentioned in op? for the general population that is more then enough gaming for a year atleast. other then hard code gamers, people do not want to spend 60 bucks every month. i have never spent more then 25 on game and game listed are truly good.
 
It's the "Nintendo" difference.

Nintendo also gets a free pass for doing the absolute minimum to support their consoles while 3rd parties get crucified for doing the same.

The Holy Church of Nintendo can do no wrong.


The irony of this post.

I'm not sure you know what irony means. Wii U is probably my least played console.
 
"There are fewer good games on Nintendo consoles. Also fewer games in general. Hardware is underpowered as fuck. Buy a Wii U this Christmas!" - NOA

bNr1age.gif
 
I'll clarify, the Nintendo crowd is very lenient on Nintendo for allowing long droughts of games on their consoles. Meanwhile, they heavily criticize third party publishers for doing the same on Nintendo consoles.

Huh? You do know Nintendo is only one company and can only do some much, right? I like how you use the word "allowing" like it's their goal to do that. It's not like they may have limited manpower and therefore can't release a game every week.
 
Have to say I like the metric of only pronouncing a game as of the highest quality only if the positivity is shared among both critics and users. Creates a lot less oddities at the top table than just using critics.
 
Well using user scores makes actually more sense than using the "review" scores done by "professional" sites like IGN, Polygon and so on, that are seeing "Oscar-caliber drama"s and are giving out 10/10 like candy as soon as the publisher orders a bit of ad-space on their site.

For quite a few games the user score makes way more sense than the "professional" "review" score. Just take a look at for example NieR.

And for the games Nintendo listed there isn't actually a huge difference between those "professional" reviews and the actual user reviews. At least for the Wii U side. I don't care enough to check the 3DS side.

Bayonetta 1 86 / 9.1
Bayonetta 2 91 / 9.1
Smash Bros 92 / 9.0
3D World 93 / 9.0
Mario Kart 88 / 9.1
Wind Waker 90 / 8.9
Rayman Legends 92 / 8.5
Pikmin 3 87 / 8.6

Just no. User reviews in a lot of cases are laughable. Just look at the negatives and you will see comments that will make your head hurt coupled with scores of 0 and 10's galore for little reason. Its a joke.

The only reason this silly metric is used by NoA is create the image that WiiU/3DS has more "quality" games.
 
You aren´t supposed to understand that the picture in the OP is just marketing material with handcrafted rules to make the advertised product look good.

You are meant to drag fanboy drivel like "the church of Nintendo" into this and assert that Nintendo fans are somehow hypocritical....or don´t even look at the picture in the OP and say " DISAGREE, system XYZ is far better !" .
"The church of Nintendo", yet we aren't meant to drag fanboy drivel into this. Good on you for being a massive hypocrite.
 
Just no. User reviews in a lot of cases are laughable. Just look at the negatives and you will see comments that will make your head hurt coupled with scores of 0 and 10's galore for little reason. Its a joke.

The only reason this silly metric is used by NoA is create the image that WiiU has more "quality" games.

This post makes my head hurt.
 
Just no. User reviews in a lot of cases are laughable. Just look at the negatives and you will see comments that will make your head hurt coupled with scores of 0 and 10's galore for little reason. Its a joke.

The only reason this silly metric is used by NoA is create the image that WiiU has more "quality" games.
Isn't it a good sign if people aren't crowding your games to give it 0s though? Like people give the game 0s when they don't like it for whatever reason.
 
"The church of Nintendo", yet we aren't meant to drag fanboy drivel into this. Good on you for being a massive hypocrite.

My post was reeking of sarkasm, Khaos_Knight was the one who used the "church of Nintendo"-shit :P. It was written from the perspective of someone who is incredibly offended by this absolutely harmless ad.

Poe´s law in full effect :U
 
I'll clarify, the Nintendo crowd is very lenient on Nintendo for allowing long droughts of games on their consoles. Meanwhile, they heavily criticize third party publishers for doing the same on Nintendo consoles.

Because good games take time, which is something we've been able to reliably anticipate from Nintendo. If Microsoft or Sony were on their own and not jerking off the big Three AAA, they'd have the same crappy situation
 
My post was reeking of sarkasm, Khaos_Knight was the one who used the "church of Nintendo"-shit :P. It was written from the perspective of someone who is incredibly offended by this absolutely harmless ad.

Poe´s law in full effect :U

My apologies friend. :)
 
Because good games take time, which is something we've been able to reliably anticipate from Nintendo. If Microsoft or Sony were on their own and not jerking off the big Three AAA, they'd have the same crappy situation

Funny part is, they are jerking off AAA publishers who are releasing AAA rushed garbage.
 
Just no. User reviews in a lot of cases are laughable.

So just like some of those "professional" reviews.

http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/zombiu-review/1900-6400225/
ZombiU - 4.5/10: The bad: Wii U gamepad adds little and hurts immersion

http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/donkey-kong-country-tropical-freeze-review/1900-6415667/
DKC: Tropical Freeze - 6/10: The bad: Dull, derivative level design, Employs some cheap and frustrating platforming tricks

The only reason this silly metric is used by NoA is create the image that WiiU has more "quality" games.

Are you blind or something? The average user score is around the same as the average "professional" scores (I guess super trustworthy to you), that were given out for Wii U games. I just listed them. Right in the post you quoted.
 
So just like those "professional" reviews.

http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/zombiu-review/1900-6400225/


http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/donkey-kong-country-tropical-freeze-review/1900-6415667/




Are you blind or something? The average user score is around the same as the "professional" scores (I guess super trustworthy to you), that were given out for Wii U games. I just listed them. Right in the post you quoted.

Look at the guys post history. Ignore him. He is one of the biggest Sony homers, anti-Nintendo psychos on GAF.
 
I'm not sure if this was mentioned but there's a few simple statistical reasons why the user scores for Wii U games are higher than PS4 and XB1.

> Most Wii U games are niche in the grand scheme of console gaming. They barely sell. Why is this relevant? Because the vast majority of the people who will post user scores for them are people who have actually bought and played the games, thus getting higher user scores. Mainstream games like CoD get FAR more criticism and backlash. Most mainstream console gamers haven't even heard of these Wii U games.

> There's a legit rivalry between PS4 fanboys and XB1 fanboys. They will give far more 1s and 10s respectively than Wii U user scores because Wii U doesn't exist in there eyes. Console warring to them is just PS4 vs XB1. Wii U is niche and irrelevant for them.

> The size of the Nintendo fanbase is disproportionately high on the Internet for whatever reason. I'm probably going to get shit for this one while people ignore the two above but it's true. There's tons of Nintendo fans on NeoGAF yet the Wii U sells 75k consoles per month on NPD. They're an extremely vocal and passionate fanbase.

/2cents
 
So just like some of those "professional" reviews.

http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/zombiu-review/1900-6400225/


http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/donkey-kong-country-tropical-freeze-review/1900-6415667/




Are you blind or something? The average user score is around the same as the average "professional" scores (I guess super trustworthy to you), that were given out for Wii U games. I just listed them. Right in the post you quoted.
I think he meant that lots of games on other platforms with Metascores above 85 have nuked user scores.
 
Are you even allowed to include Pokemon X and Y?

might as well have game of the year editions.

Also I have a Wii U. After my little sister finished Mario 3D World it became useless. If sell it I am probably gonna have a 150 dollar lost and I only bought it a month ago or so.
 
Are you even allowed to include Pokemon X and Y?

might as well have game of the year editions.

Also I have a Wii U. After my little sister finished Mario 3D World it became useless. If sell it I am probably gonna have a 150 dollar lost and I only bought it a month ago or so.

Protip: There are other games.
It´s a secret to everyone
 
Are you even allowed to include Pokemon X and Y?

might as well have game of the year editions.

Also I have a Wii U. After my little sister finished Mario 3D World it became useless. If sell it I am probably gonna have a 150 dollar lost and I only bought it a month ago or so.

You are missing out on a lot of amazing shit. You poor soul.
 
Looking at my library, I bought 5 Wii U games this year. It took me three years to acquire that many games for the regular Wii. It's a shame the system released when it did in the state it did, because I feel a lot of people are missing out.
 
Surprised by the salty reaction over a small ad. If you don't agree, just make your own lists as it honestly doesn't matter either way.
 
I think he meant that lots of games on other platforms with Metascores above 85 have nuked user scores.

and it's pretty unreasonable to think that the reason for that is that theres more people giving those games 0 for no reason...

Like others have said, the note that we end up with using user reviews makes more sense than the critic reciews in many cases.
 
Wow some people have really got their panties in a bunch over this. Nintendo has released excellent games this year, and they have by far had the best exclusive output of any of the console manufacturers, in my opinion.
 
Top Bottom