Hibiki Kurosawa
Member
Well it's pretty much true at this point. 3DS is one hell of a system! It's one of my favs right now!
They actually included user scores bwahahaha
It's the "Nintendo" difference.Anyone else find it BS Wii U gets a free pass for hiding behind another platform?
Paying a $1000 sure isn't going to make the PS4/XBO look less attractive when it does 1st party and 3rd party support for far less.
The irony of this post.Nintendo didn't claim they could cure you of being a fanboy so I'm not sure what your post has to do with the thread.
List of games meeting the criteria, I'm counting 9 right now:
PlayStation 4:
The Last of Us Remastered (95 / 8.7)
Guilty Gear Xrd -SIGN- (86 / 8.5)
Xbox One:
None
PlayStation Vita:
Persona 4 Golden (93 / 9.3)
Rayman Origins (88 / 8.5)
Machinarium (88 / 8.5)
LittleBigPlanet PS Vita (88 / 8.8)
Rayman Legends (87 / 8.7) (probably not counted)
Tearaway (87 / 9.1)
Final Fantasy X / X-2 HD Remaster (86 / 8.6)
I guess we can blame PS/Xbox fanboys trolling each other.
Nintendo also gets a free pass for doing the absolute minimum to support their consoles while 3rd parties get crucified for doing the same.
I am a littler confused, people are complaining that nintendo uses user scores, but doesn't it also say regular meta critic score of 85+? So what they're saying is professional reviewers and users agree this game is quality? In my opinion, this makes their claim more credible when both users and reviewers agree.
I'll clarify, the Nintendo crowd is very lenient on Nintendo for allowing long droughts of games on their consoles. Meanwhile, they heavily criticize third party publishers for doing the same on Nintendo consoles.Half of this sentence is BS and the other part doesn't make any sense.
Are you sure about that? Take a look back through this thread, or head over to the Game of the Year 2014 voting topic to see people having meltdowns over an influx of Bayonetta 2 votes.
Nintendo also gets a free pass for doing the absolute minimum to support their consoles while 3rd parties get crucified for doing the same.
"Nuh uh"Ummmmm what's the argument. It's true, so I fail to see what's got everyone up in arms.
Ummmmm what's the argument. It's true, so I fail to see what's got everyone up in arms.
"There are fewer good games on Nintendo consoles. Also fewer games in general. Hardware is underpowered as fuck. Buy a Wii U this Christmas!" - NOA
It's the "Nintendo" difference.
Nintendo also gets a free pass for doing the absolute minimum to support their consoles while 3rd parties get crucified for doing the same.
The Holy Church of Nintendo can do no wrong.
The irony of this post.
"There are fewer good games on Nintendo consoles. Also fewer games in general. Hardware is underpowered as fuck. Buy a Wii U this Christmas!" - NOA
was this joke or serious?
How did a thread for such a straightforward ad work its way up to 17 pages? It's an ad. What else are they going to say?
I'll clarify, the Nintendo crowd is very lenient on Nintendo for allowing long droughts of games on their consoles. Meanwhile, they heavily criticize third party publishers for doing the same on Nintendo consoles.
Well using user scores makes actually more sense than using the "review" scores done by "professional" sites like IGN, Polygon and so on, that are seeing "Oscar-caliber drama"s and are giving out 10/10 like candy as soon as the publisher orders a bit of ad-space on their site.
For quite a few games the user score makes way more sense than the "professional" "review" score. Just take a look at for example NieR.
And for the games Nintendo listed there isn't actually a huge difference between those "professional" reviews and the actual user reviews. At least for the Wii U side. I don't care enough to check the 3DS side.
Bayonetta 1 86 / 9.1
Bayonetta 2 91 / 9.1
Smash Bros 92 / 9.0
3D World 93 / 9.0
Mario Kart 88 / 9.1
Wind Waker 90 / 8.9
Rayman Legends 92 / 8.5
Pikmin 3 87 / 8.6
I'll clarify, the Nintendo crowd is very lenient on Nintendo for allowing long droughts of games on their consoles. Meanwhile, they heavily criticize third party publishers for doing the same on Nintendo consoles.
So what's your excuse for the huge droughts on PS4 and X1 its first year?
"The church of Nintendo", yet we aren't meant to drag fanboy drivel into this. Good on you for being a massive hypocrite.You aren´t supposed to understand that the picture in the OP is just marketing material with handcrafted rules to make the advertised product look good.
You are meant to drag fanboy drivel like "the church of Nintendo" into this and assert that Nintendo fans are somehow hypocritical....or don´t even look at the picture in the OP and say " DISAGREE, system XYZ is far better !" .
Just no. User reviews in a lot of cases are laughable. Just look at the negatives and you will see comments that will make your head hurt coupled with scores of 0 and 10's galore for little reason. Its a joke.
The only reason this silly metric is used by NoA is create the image that WiiU has more "quality" games.
Outside of 1st party games, what kind of drought was there on the two consoles?So what's your excuse for the huge droughts on PS4 and X1 its first year?
Isn't it a good sign if people aren't crowding your games to give it 0s though? Like people give the game 0s when they don't like it for whatever reason.Just no. User reviews in a lot of cases are laughable. Just look at the negatives and you will see comments that will make your head hurt coupled with scores of 0 and 10's galore for little reason. Its a joke.
The only reason this silly metric is used by NoA is create the image that WiiU has more "quality" games.
"The church of Nintendo", yet we aren't meant to drag fanboy drivel into this. Good on you for being a massive hypocrite.
I'll clarify, the Nintendo crowd is very lenient on Nintendo for allowing long droughts of games on their consoles. Meanwhile, they heavily criticize third party publishers for doing the same on Nintendo consoles.
My post was reeking of sarkasm, Khaos_Knight was the one who used the "church of Nintendo"-shit. It was written from the perspective of someone who is incredibly offended by this absolutely harmless ad.
Poe´s law in full effect :U
Because good games take time, which is something we've been able to reliably anticipate from Nintendo. If Microsoft or Sony were on their own and not jerking off the big Three AAA, they'd have the same crappy situation
Dead last and arrogant.
the Wii U is not a console. So no it's not.
Just no. User reviews in a lot of cases are laughable.
ZombiU - 4.5/10: The bad: Wii U gamepad adds little and hurts immersion
DKC: Tropical Freeze - 6/10: The bad: Dull, derivative level design, Employs some cheap and frustrating platforming tricks
The only reason this silly metric is used by NoA is create the image that WiiU has more "quality" games.
So just like those "professional" reviews.
http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/zombiu-review/1900-6400225/
http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/donkey-kong-country-tropical-freeze-review/1900-6415667/
Are you blind or something? The average user score is around the same as the "professional" scores (I guess super trustworthy to you), that were given out for Wii U games. I just listed them. Right in the post you quoted.
I think he meant that lots of games on other platforms with Metascores above 85 have nuked user scores.So just like some of those "professional" reviews.
http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/zombiu-review/1900-6400225/
http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/donkey-kong-country-tropical-freeze-review/1900-6415667/
Are you blind or something? The average user score is around the same as the average "professional" scores (I guess super trustworthy to you), that were given out for Wii U games. I just listed them. Right in the post you quoted.
Are you even allowed to include Pokemon X and Y?
might as well have game of the year editions.
Also I have a Wii U. After my little sister finished Mario 3D World it became useless. If sell it I am probably gonna have a 150 dollar lost and I only bought it a month ago or so.
Are you even allowed to include Pokemon X and Y?
might as well have game of the year editions.
Also I have a Wii U. After my little sister finished Mario 3D World it became useless. If sell it I am probably gonna have a 150 dollar lost and I only bought it a month ago or so.
I think he meant that lots of games on other platforms with Metascores above 85 have nuked user scores.