Peterthumpa
Member
I'm not really an expert on business strategies and approaches, and I'm probably beating a dead horse here, but I'm still trying to understand two points:
- lack of AC adapter;
- only XL version available;
From a cost perspective, I'm really, really doubtful about the real financial benefits on omitting a required accessory for a device like this versus the image damage that this kind of decision may cause. Nintendo is basically lying about the device's MSRP if a charger isn't included, the potential buyer has to buy one, plain and simple. And the "oh, you can use your current 3DS charger" will never cut it. You'll want to sell the thing sooner or later, and doing it without a charger included will lead to a smaller resell value. So, in other words, why Nintendo? Why? Supply constraints? It's not like this company is bleeding money to come up with such extreme decisions. Things like this are what makes me fear for their next console / handheld in the oven - it's puzzling.
Also, more or less the same rant for the non-XL New 3DS. I mean, again, from a financial point of view, faceplates should, in theory, reactivate one of the money printing machines in idle inside Nintendo's HQ. Just take a guess about how much they cost for the end consumer versus how much they cost for Nintendo to produce. Take into account that a single owner could buy dozens of those things, and you got yourself an insta-success on your hands. Again, supply constraints?
Or maybe, just maybe... really bad senior management? I'm sorry guys, but I can't see a point, at all, in things like this. If there's one, enlighten me.
- lack of AC adapter;
- only XL version available;
From a cost perspective, I'm really, really doubtful about the real financial benefits on omitting a required accessory for a device like this versus the image damage that this kind of decision may cause. Nintendo is basically lying about the device's MSRP if a charger isn't included, the potential buyer has to buy one, plain and simple. And the "oh, you can use your current 3DS charger" will never cut it. You'll want to sell the thing sooner or later, and doing it without a charger included will lead to a smaller resell value. So, in other words, why Nintendo? Why? Supply constraints? It's not like this company is bleeding money to come up with such extreme decisions. Things like this are what makes me fear for their next console / handheld in the oven - it's puzzling.
Also, more or less the same rant for the non-XL New 3DS. I mean, again, from a financial point of view, faceplates should, in theory, reactivate one of the money printing machines in idle inside Nintendo's HQ. Just take a guess about how much they cost for the end consumer versus how much they cost for Nintendo to produce. Take into account that a single owner could buy dozens of those things, and you got yourself an insta-success on your hands. Again, supply constraints?
Or maybe, just maybe... really bad senior management? I'm sorry guys, but I can't see a point, at all, in things like this. If there's one, enlighten me.