It's a matter of principals (feelings), not a matter of effects (cost, effort). We've established it. I'm going to explain why I feel it's shitty even if this is not necessarily how it plays out for me.
No, you're being labeled as such because you are in here making excuses for a company that is fucking its consumers.
There is no excuse or defense for this shit. And yet, I am biting the bullet and putting up with it because I'm weak. No one has called me an apologist.
Correct. Buying the N3DS and then buying a charger doesn't make you a corporate apologist. Saying that it isn't that big of a deal, telling people they are overreacting, saying it isn't a black/white issue makes you a corporate apologist. This isn't a complex issue. Nintendo has zero excuse, adding in an AC Adapter that costs them sub $1 on a $200 electronic device isn't that difficult. Defending a corporation that is doing something that is anti-consumer makes you a corporate apologist.
When you start having calls for government intervention, you leave the zone of "reasonable criticism" and go full blown into "is he really serious/concern trolling" territory.
No one likes the fact that there's no AC adapter included, but some of the responses liken this to an affront of a religion, and that's just a tad bit overboard.
Its sad to see anti consumer practices like this being justified and even outright praised here. No, it's not even sad really, it's sickening. People bending over backwards to defend corporations. The lot of you corporate apologists might as well have obey stamped on your fucking foreheads.
I mean, I get that you're upset, but really? No one thinks this is really a good idea, but some of us just kinda shrug. Yeah maybe we should be more upset, but that doesn't make us mindless drones of consumerism. It's these reactions that I personally take pause and speak up to criticize.
Yeah, i dont see the need for exaggerations like that. I think its important to see what the case is really about and have a perspective out from that (we're talking about a charging cable here). Its also fully possible to say that this is such a small thing in the big scheme of things without having anything to do with being a corporate apologists.
Yeah, i dont see the need for exaggerations like that. I think its important to see what the case is really about and have a perspective out from that (we're talking about a charging cable here). Its also fully possible to say that this is such a small thing in the big scheme of things without having anything to do with being a corporate apologists.
Yeah, i dont see the need for exaggerations like that. I think its important to see what the case is really about and have a perspective out from that (we're talking about a charging cable here). Its also fully possible to say that this is such a small thing in the big scheme of things without having anything to do with being a corporate apologists.
I know we are talking about an integral part, saying it's just a charging cable is kinda of funny. You are buying an electronic device that cannot be used with the items in the box. Yet, we have people acting like meh, whatever.
No, you're being labeled as such because you are in here making excuses for a company that is fucking its consumers.
Three is no excuse or defense for this shit. And yet, I am buying the billet and putting up with it because I'm weak. No one has called me an apologist.
Seriously. It isn't too bad on here, but some of the comments I've seen on other sites reminds me of people in abusive relationships. "YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND, HE BEATS ME BECAUSE HE LOVES ME". It's crazy.
My big issue with it is besides the fact that it's stupid, is I wish there was transparency here. Nintendo, just say it's saving you money. Be transparent about it. I'd bet the retailers giving shelf space for this are happy too because it ups their attachment rate and it's probably a high mark up item. But just be honest about why you're doing it.
Also, I think it speaks to the fact that Nintendo probably doesn't expect to get new customers with this device. It seems like they're positioning it to be an upgrade for people who have the 3ds currently.
I told the story to all my non-gamer colleagues. I do not think a single one thought it was a good idea. People have become accustomed to things, and charger included is one.
So they're acting like they have been eating this cost all along and we should be thankful for a "lower price" on the unit rather than the truth of, they want to produce an item for ~$1 and sell it for ~$10?
I'm kind of amazed that the people who think this is no big deal are so committed to filling this thread with Nintendo defense posts. What's the motivation? Obviously the people on the other side are going to be active in a thread like this because of their outrage... they're pissed at a company that's trying to sell a product that won't work out of the box. But I don't get how anyone would be energized to defend such a company.
So they're acting like they have been eating this cost all along and we should be thankful for a "lower price" on the unit rather than the truth of, they want to produce an item for ~$1 and sell it for ~$10?
I know we are talking about an integral part, saying it's just a charging cable is kinda of funny. You are buying an electronic device that cannot be used with the items in the box. Yet, we have people acting like meh, whatever.
So they're acting like they have been eating this cost all along and we should be thankful for a "lower price" on the unit rather than the truth of, they want to produce an item for ~$1 and sell it for ~$10?
It's just a terrible experience for a new 3DS owner. I could understand if the charging port was micro-USB or something, but it's proprietary. How are they supposed to know the brand new system they just bought doesn't come with the necessary adapter to charge the thing?
I think this will be the most common respond. I think the same thing, sounds like a weird and silly thing when a charger isnt included in the package. Its whats being done about it that matters the most, in my opinion, after the intial reaction and the opinion about it has been spoken.
In the big scheme of things, not at all, at least in my opinion. It sounds like a silly decision to not include a charger, no arguements from me against that. But i have bigger problem in my life (unfortunately) than having to shell out some extra for a charger. I'm basically saying my opinion about it, that i think the decision to not include a charger is silly, but then i try to find a solution to how to solve it the best way for me. I dont think this issue is big enough to waste a lot of energy on.
Can we stop with the bad analogies? They're popping up all over the place lately and they don't help discussion at all, mostly because they're all awful.
It would be much better to just discuss the product at hand and explain why you feel it's unreasonable/reasonable.
there's really no excuse. People I know (apologists, I guess you'd call them) are needling me for not keeping the charger from my stolen 3DS (I gave it to someone who needed it, figuring I had no use of it..) and saying it's my fault I now need to buy one, and that Nintendo is in the right.
If you buy a device that needs ac power, it should come with something to get that ac power. especially if the adapter it needs is something proprietary like Nintendo's. I can't understand how anyone can defend them selling a device that needs to be plugged in and not including the means to plug it in. It's baffling.
In the big scheme of things, not at all, at least in my opinion. It sounds like a silly decision to not include a charger, no arguements from me against that. But i have bigger problem in my life (unfortunately) than having to shell out some extra for a charger. I'm basically saying my opinion about it, that i think the decision to not include a charger is silly, but then i try to find a solution to how to solve it the best way for me.
Understandable, by all means buy the N3DS and buy a charger. It works for you, that is fine. It doesn't make you a corporate apologist, but we do have those here that are legitimately defending the practice.
I think this thread wouldn't reach this page if not for the people defending Nintendo. Its surprising to see people go so far in defending such a practice.I'm starting to wonder how far will people go to defend Sony or Microsoft if they did something similar.
Nintendo is making an assumption that people who purchase the New Nintendo 3DS already have an AC adapter. In Japan, the plug came with the DSi and the smaller 3DS, but it did not come with the 3DS XL as well as both New Nintendo 3DS sizes.The odd thing is that Nintendo is actually punishing people who are not early adopters. So, if you bought an original-size Nintendo 3DS, then you got a plug. But if you waited for the XL, too bad.The odd thing is that Nintendo is actually punishing people who are not early adopters. So, if you bought an original-size Nintendo 3DS, then you got a plug. But if you waited for the XL, too bad.
Nintendo may say it's not passing along charges to the consumer or that it's saving the consumer money. Actually, Nintendo is saving Nintendo money. Nintendo is thinking about what's best for Nintendo.
I can't even... now we are being the bad guys because we want free stuff? Namely the AC adapter? Ok, I said last post would be my last but it's hard not to come back to this thread :/
Understandable, by all means buy the N3DS and buy a charger. It works for you, that is fine. It doesn't make you a corporate apologist, but we do have those here that are legitimately defending the practice.
Yeah, i dont see why there is much need to defend the practice in itself.
Generally speaking, i wish that electronic devices would have on standard charger for everything. I think that could be benefitial for the enviorment (as it would reduce the need to produce more chargers). Cellphones used to be bad at this, but now everything uses micro-usb (or lightning for iPhone).
Yeah, i dont see why there is much need to defend the practice in itself.
Generally speaking, i wish that electronic devices would have on standard charger for everything. I think that could be benefitial for the enviorment (as it would reduce the need to produce more chargers). Cellphones used to be bad at this, but now everything uses micro-usb (or lightning for iPhone).
Speaking of lightning for iPhone, this is essentially the same as Apple not shipping a lightning cable with the iPhone. I wonder how many people defending this practice would suddenly have a problem with it if it were Apple.
Generally speaking, i wish that electronic devices would have on standard charger for everything. I think that could be benefitial for the enviorment (as it would reduce the need to produce more chargers). Cellphones used to be bad at this, but now everything uses micro-usb (or lightning for iPhone).
You know I agree to an extent. The biggest problem is some chargers charge my devices faster. My Amazon Kindle charger charges my cell phone 4x faster than the charger that came with the phone.
You know I agree to an extent. The biggest problem is some chargers charge my devices faster. My Amazon Kindle charger charges my cell phone 4x faster than the charger that came with the phone.
You may want to look into the draw of your charger... and the battery, and see how those ratings compare. It may well be charging it faster but if it starts singing a loud tune, you'll probably not be very happy.
Thanks for posting that... nice article. Hopefully someone at Nintendo will wake up and see how disgusting this is, and they'll figure out a way to get the cable in there before Feb. 13.
You may want to look into the draw of your charger... and the battery, and see how those ratings compare. It may well be charging it faster but if it starts singing a loud tune, you'll probably not be very happy.
I think that will be the response from every outsider who hears about it. Even Apple doesn't do this shit, and theyre maybe the one company that could get away with it.
I don't get anyone defending this. It's absolutely insane. The device you get from the box only works for 10 hours before I have to spend more money to continue using it.
This point has been made dozens of times in this thread, and answered just as many times: The PS3 still came with composite cables so you could use the thing.
So weird seeing all this outrage as a European. Seems like such a none issue nowadays here. As long as it's clear there isn't one in the box (it is) and as long as shop assistant/websites sell essential items at pos (they should do in any half decent electronics store), then this really shouldn't be an issue for the vast majority of people. Everyone thought it would be a huge issue the the UK, it wasn't.
Net result is it's slightly cheaper, and those who have a charger aren't paying for what they don't need. If you need to buy one separately, you would have been paying that cost if it was included in the box anyway so no harm.
Plus all the publicity it's getting will probably help inform potential buyers quite nicely
Net result is it's slightly cheaper, and those who have a charger aren't paying for what they don't need. If you need to buy one separately, you would have been paying that cost if it was included in the box anyway so no harm.
Net result is the price is the exact same, they aren't cutting you a slight discount. The price would have been the exact same if the charger was included. You really think they were going to break the $199 price point for a $1-2 charger?
So weird seeing all this outrage as a European. Seems like such a none issue nowadays here. As long as it's clear there isn't one in the box (it is) and as long as shop assistant/websites sell essential items at pos (they should do in any half decent electronics store), then this really shouldn't be an issue for the vast majority of people. Everyone thought it would be a huge issue the the UK, it wasn't.
Net result is it's slightly cheaper, and those who have a charger aren't paying for what they don't need. If you need to buy one separately, you would have been paying that cost if it was included in the box anyway so no harm.
Plus all the publicity it's getting will probably help inform potential buyers quite nicely
Europeans tend to have what I feel is a better sense of consumer rights than Americans. This is being viewed as a ripoff when all Nintendo is doing is providing choice. Choice is always a good thing when it comes to consumer friendliness. Why it's being spun the other way? no idea.
Europeans tend to have what I feel is a better sense of consumer rights than Americans. This is being viewed as a ripoff when all Nintendo is doing is providing choice. Choice is always a good thing when it comes to consumer friendliness. Why it's being spun the other way? no idea.
The price is honestly the biggest story out of today's events and it's being lost in adapter-gate. The 3DS is 4 years old at this point, and they're still asking $200 for the new revision. Never mind a refurb Wii U, you could have bought a fucking Xbone over the Holidays for $200 effective if you otherwise wanted to buy one of the bundled games. As outrageous as the cost is, they're doing so knowing full well the platform only has 1-2 more years of notable support (if that). Topping it off with the official excuse of a $2 adapter bleeding them dry in BoM and they've blown way past insulting to lost their fucking minds territory.
charging 200 dollars for a device with a 240p screen in the year of our lord 2015 is insanity alone but i give nintendo credit with their innovation in the handheld space. first it was region-locking and now it's not including proprietary accessories needed for the system to function. trailblazers.
I agree. The New 3DS should be between $150 to $170 by now at the very least, as it'll be officially 4 years old on the 26th of February (that's the date in which the 3DS was first released in Japan).