I believe the key word I used is "generally."
There was no "generally" used in your original post.
I believe the key word I used is "generally."
Um, the kickstarter money was donated before the videos were made. And speaking for every backer seems unwise, though most critics do seem to not be backers.
Also, "the Tropes vs Women project is a nonprofit endeavor", as described by Anita Sarkeesian.
They want to look good. It's a simple way to make some people happy, why not? It's free
You're comparing a waitress to someone who made a page on KS?
A lot of the initial harasment wasnt just about her making those videos. It was about her needing money to buy games so she could do research. Something i dont think would be a huge issue with anyone whos actually a passionate gamer because theyd have past experience and id suspect a decent enough library. Which she clearly didnt outside a handful of games. So yes in a way she helped make herself an easy target. Still doesnt mean she deserved the harassment. And i didnt say she hasnt done anything positive. I just think someone more integrated into gaming would be more effective.
Since we are talking about a female figurehead, yeah, I thought waitress was a good comparison, I neglected to point out $5.60 (or my original $7) was less than the federal minimum wage.
But if you want to say she shouldn't pay herself, you are free to make that argument, as we are to counter and mock it.
No, I was laughing at your post because you're comparing a hard working waitress/waiter to someone who made a blog and received money.
It seems like common sense. People got to live, eat, deal with violent terrorist threats, etc. Do people think labor is free?
Im a medical device sales guy and virtually all of the Hospitals I work with are "non Profit" institutions. They still have multiple employees that make well over 500k/year a piece. Its just the institution uses its profits to fuel itself in future projects and stuff.
Non-Profit does not mean all of the employees work for free.
You said you only saw fighting in response to claims she raised awareness. How is that not equivalent to claiming she didn't raise awareness?This is what in talking about. People cant have a civilized discussion without attacking each other. I didnt say she didnt raise any awareness. Its just its been mixed in with a lot of negativity as well.
No, I was laughing at your post because you're comparing a hard working waitress/waiter to someone who made a blog and received money.
No, I was laughing at your post because you're comparing a hard working waitress/waiter to someone who made a blog and received money.
This is what in talking about. People cant have a civilized discussion without attacking each other. I didnt say she didnt raise any awareness. Its just its been mixed in with a lot of negativity as well.
Well just look at this thread. People say shes done well by raising awareness but all i see is one side fighting with another. I feel like someone who actually gave a damn about gaming and really wanted to change it would of been more effective and would of not have shifted so much focus on themselves and instead focus on the issues. Well she tried movies first i think and i guess it didnt work out for her so gaming was next i suppose. Seems she got what she wanted in a way.
You don't think research, analysis, critical writing, video compiling & production is hard work?
Good for her!
I think she's making a greater/better impact than most kickstarter campaigns do, and she's creating content, content that has actual merit. I also love seeing entitles douche-nozzles get their panties in a bunch over her opinions. They're kinda proving her points.
Im a medical device sales guy and virtually all of the Hospitals I work with are "non Profit" institutions. They still have multiple employees that make well over 500k/year a piece. Its just the institution uses its profits to fuel itself in future projects and stuff.
Non-Profit does not mean all of the employees work for free.
$5.60 an hour assuming full time employment. $7 if you assume nearly two months vacation.
Being a waitress would pay more. Both #s are less than the minimum wage.
But, thanks for playing.
Edit: Decided to use 2080 hours (52 x 40) in a year instead of a more common 1824. Because I can
Edit #2: adding that both #s are lower the minimum wage.
I rather do this than be a waiter.
You don't think research, analysis, critical writing, video compiling & production is hard work?
There was no "generally" used in your original post.
I'm going to Kickstart my salary if you guys want to join. 99% will be salary, but it'll be good. I'll just find a subject that people feel they need to be gun-ho about for the week and make meh points the entire time.
Please, think of the subject matter.
If it's that easy, go do it.
No. Really. Otherwise you're just talking out of your ass.
This is her job now. She is going to pay herself to do it.
$5.60 an hour assuming full time employment. $7 if you assume nearly two months vacation.
Being a waitress would pay more. Both #s are less than the minimum wage.
But, thanks for playing.
Edit: Decided to use 2080 hours (52 x 40) in a year instead of a more common 1824. Because I can
Edit #2: adding that both #s are lower the minimum wage.
I'll never understand the hate she gets. You can disagree with someone without hating them. That's how you debate and make progress on things.
She's far far more open than the vast majority of the Kickstarters out there.
Lol what? Your the one with the salty as fuck original postSorry this offended you and hurt your feelings to get that emotional over it.
She's much more open than them but it should be pretty obvious why she's getting a lot of hate. A lot of people just really have a problem with feminism, sadly.I'll never understand the hate she gets. You can disagree with someone without hating them. That's how you debate and make progress on things.
She's far far more open than the vast majority of the Kickstarters out there.
Sorry this offended you and hurt your feelings to get that emotional over it.
Sorry this offended you and hurt your feelings to get that emotional over it.
She's much more open than them but it should be pretty obvious why she's getting a lot of hate. A lot of people just really have a problem with feminism, sadly.
No, I was laughing at your post because you're comparing a hard working waitress/waiter to someone who made a blog and received money.
You don't think research, analysis, critical writing, video compiling & production is hard work?
That doesn't answer the question.
Do you think the writing & production that goes into FF videos is hard work?
Sorry this offended you and hurt your feelings to get that emotional over it.
I've got some doctrinal disagreements with her on the finer points of feminism in some cases, but if you flat-out oppose her then uh yeah.Is that really all it boils down to? If you disagree with her, or just don't like her, it's because you have a problem with feminism?
Pretty much every kickstarter draws tons of ire lately. Seems to stem from poeple thinking donated money isn't earned, and that no product from such funding can possibly ever measure up to what was asked of the people requesting the funding initially.I'll never understand the hate she gets. You can disagree with someone without hating them. That's how you debate and make progress on things.
She's far far more open than the vast majority of the Kickstarters out there.
Not so much funny as expected. I would expect the kind of people who give money to this sort of project to be extremely pleased with the very big successes she's had in spreading her feminist message. If I'm giving money to produce a small series of videos for a cause I believed in I would trade a delay in the completion of the original project due to expanded scope for the kind of successes she's had with this in a heartbeat. Any non backer getting angry over "concern" for her backers clearly have another agenda.She sits home all day and eats potato chips!
It's funny to me that most of the outrage over her KS comes from people who didn't back her, while most backers are happy with what she's done and thrilled she's doing bigger things than the videos now to gain awareness.
FF videos? No, it's not. The production is sub par and her arguments are recycled. You're putting down real production and editing down if you think FF is hard work.
Her arguments are recycled in content. That's why this entire thing is so darkly hilarious. Nothing she's saying is groundbreaking and yet people still freak the fuck out about itFF videos? No, it's not. The production is sub par and her arguments are recycled. You're putting down real production and editing down if you think FF is hard work.
Is that really all it boils down to? If you disagree with her, or just don't like her, it's because you have a problem with feminism?
I've got some doctrinal disagreements with her on the finer points of feminism in some cases, but if you flat-out oppose her then uh yeah.
I think there is some truth in the fact that a lot of her detractors don't really watch her videos and just dislike the subject matter while throwing around the term "SJW". I understand your frustration that people with actual criticism on her work are lumped in with that crowd, though.
It says right in the OP she is volunteering her time to the project.
You're having a laugh if you think 40 hours a week are spent on this.
Not so much funny as expected. I would expect the kind of people who give money to this sort of project to be extremely pleased with the very big successes she's had in spreading her feminist message. If I'm giving money to produce a small series of videos for a cause I believed in I would trade a delay in the completion of the original project due to expanded scope for the kind of successes she's had with this in a heartbeat.
Why did you put the word hate in ""?I disagree. To me, she's been a questionable character from the very beginning, and I think a lot of what she does is manipulate the feelings of the liberal internet for her own benefit. I'd actually liken her to the worst of feminism: Someone exploiting it, as well as the "hate" she gets from more backwards people with regards to the subject, for her own personal benefit. I absolutely believe in the general thrust of feminism, but I don't think Sarkeesian's methods or even some of her points are exactly the "best" of what feminism can offer.
.
Why did you put the word hate in ""?
Do you believe that hate or the threats she's recieving are fabricated?