Cpt.Underpants
Member
What about i5 3570k 4.1 ghz asus gtx 6702gb Windows 8 16 gb ram?
The Witcher 3: Is your system ready - Nvidia official system requirements
- Thread starter viveks86
- Start date
What about i5 3570k 4.1 ghz asus gtx 6702gb Windows 8 16 gb ram?
Company of Heroes as well (and I don't think you can disable the check there). Relic just has a boner for page swapping...
NoMoreTrolls
Banned
Is there a good guide/thread about overclocking? I've never attempted it before (first gaming PC built two days ago), and I don't want to fry my components.
My build:
PCPartPicker part list
My build:
PCPartPicker part list
scoobidoo112
Member
So I'm on a laptop for the time being. GTX 850m 4GB, 8GB RAM, i7-4710HQ. It runs Witcher 2 on high settings with a stable 50fps, any chance I can handle Witcher 3? I know mobile cards are pretty meh but I'm hoping I don't have to wait until I do my desktop upgrade.
Mix of Medium/high, based on everything we know so far. We're really guessing though.
finalflame
Banned
Didn't unlock -- back to the same old time as everyone else. Must have been a glitch :/
Dreams-Visions
Member
970 FTW+ ready
*dances*
Think it was mentioned a few times in this thread. Recommendation is 40+fps in the most demanding scenes.
Dries
Member
So is there already a exact number known of the fps cost that HairWorks and HBAO+ will cost? Separately and both?
With Ultra settings, HairWorks and HBAO+ I'm going for a capped 30-40 fps on my G-sync 1440p screen. I have 8GB RAM, a 2500K @ 4.4GHz and a factory-overclocked 980. Think that's doable?
With Ultra settings, HairWorks and HBAO+ I'm going for a capped 30-40 fps on my G-sync 1440p screen. I have 8GB RAM, a 2500K @ 4.4GHz and a factory-overclocked 980. Think that's doable?
Drama Zed Nod
Member
Sourtreats
Member
What kind of performance will I get on my rig if I buy this on PC?
i5 2500k sandy bridge,
Nvidia 770 Ti,
8gb RAM.
Is it possible to run it at a decent setting or should I just buy it on PS4?
i5 2500k sandy bridge,
Nvidia 770 Ti,
8gb RAM.
Is it possible to run it at a decent setting or should I just buy it on PS4?
Dictator93
Member
That rig is much better than the ps4.
770Ti? I am pretty sure that isnt a card. Do you mean the 750Ti?
The RAM and CPU config is much better than a ps4.
Sourtreats
Member
Sorry GTX 770
Dictator93
Member
Yes, much better than a ps4.
Your 770 is more or less better than a 960 so you should be able to pull off 1080P high settings
Sourtreats
Member
Fantastic, I will buy it on PC then.
Splendid. I'm not that clued up on the difference between GPU's, but 1080p max settings is what I'm aiming for.
On last question, does anyone know if the key of CDkeys is usable on Steam?
Dusktildawn48
Member
Which retailer?
There's no reason to get Gysnc right now if it's not that monitor. It's fantastic and makes me regret not waiting a few months for it when I bought mine.
However your retailer isn't offering you as good of a deal as they say they are. It retails for around 800 on sites like Amazon and Newegg, not 950.
NCIX
Well it was in CAD$ so it's about 800$ US. God our currency is so weak right now
NCIX
Well it was in CAD$ so it's about 800$ US. God our currency is so weak right now
Ah ok, yeah, that's a pretty good deal then. Not too keen on open box monitors but if they have a good return policy, I'd have jumped at it.
Only thing stopping me really is it's a higher resolution then I use right now (1080p) on a single GTX 970 I wonder how it would fare in Witcher 3 and the fact that you are forced to play game in fullscreen and not windowed borderless and it would make me alt-tab to switch screens and some game deal with that terribly.
You can play in bordereless windowed mode with Gysnc now, the most recent driver changed it so it affect those games too. Unless you just mean the game itself won't have the mode.
I have a 970 on 1440p with Gsync and so far 1440p works well with most games as long as you can keep it above 40 FPS. But yeah it's kind of a crap shoot.
huh I was sure gsync couldn't work if the game you ran was not in fullscreen, I'm trying to look for a confirmation if it does I'll buy the screen. I spend a lot of time playing FFXIV while watching tv shows on my second screen and surfing, if it's now possible that's awesome.
Not sure how it would work with a second screen but it's enabled by default on the desktop now. I think if you find the general Gsync thread you'll see people talking about it and the Nvidia rep that posts here talked about it a bit. Mainly because it makes using ULMB a bit harder now and there's been some discussion on how to make it easier to access.
BigTnaples
Todd Howard's Secret GAF Account
So, Andy said the Tweak guide should be going up today or tomorrow right?
Should give us a pretty good idea of how to make this game look as gorgeous as possible.
Also, looks here is the first example I have seen of near final code, HBAO+ On, Off. Or at least SSAO.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=164165602&postcount=803
Also...
I have a feeling some .ini setting tweaking or something will get us here. No chance they changed the rendering that drastically in the last couple months of development.
It's obviously some sort of difference in the SSAO/HBAO+ settings, but what we can't say for sure. But I have a feeling if anything gets fixed in the patch, it will be this.
This looks okay, again, different lighting.
Notice in the middle picture, how much the lightshaft changes the look of the grass?
Should give us a pretty good idea of how to make this game look as gorgeous as possible.
Also, looks here is the first example I have seen of near final code, HBAO+ On, Off. Or at least SSAO.
As I pointed out here, it seems to be disabled or glitched in many screens and footage....
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=164165602&postcount=803
Also...
I have a feeling some .ini setting tweaking or something will get us here. No chance they changed the rendering that drastically in the last couple months of development.
It's obviously some sort of difference in the SSAO/HBAO+ settings, but what we can't say for sure. But I have a feeling if anything gets fixed in the patch, it will be this.
This looks okay, again, different lighting.
Notice in the middle picture, how much the lightshaft changes the look of the grass?
So soon? The GTA V one took like a week after release
You should OC your GPU too if you have the PSU rating to spare.
I did im at 1600 mhz and i have added like 600 to the memory i guess im ok
BigTnaples
Todd Howard's Secret GAF Account
Sounds more than doable to me.
Looks like HBAO+ to me in that shot, none of the telltale artifacts of their SSAO implementation.
dampflokfreund
Banned
I'm not sure if I should buy this game for my laptop. I'm below the system requirements but I've never had any problems running modern games in high settings.
i5 4210U, GTX 850M, 8 GB.
Price is 29. Should I give it a try?
i5 4210U, GTX 850M, 8 GB.
Price is 29. Should I give it a try?
Very nice then. I'm running something comparable to your setup too. With a little tweaking it's pretty easy to get a 970 close to the performance rating of a 980 as I'm sure you're aware.
Can't wait to let my PC loose on this game finally!
Yea the performance of both of the cards are really close to 980 i guess might be a little better, its coming out tomorrow right ? At late night i guess ?
BigTnaples
Todd Howard's Secret GAF Account
Nice.
Could your more trained eyes tell us what seems to be the difference between these recent screens of grass
And these?
I am leaning towards it just being REALLY dependent on weather/ToD/Lighting how good/bad the foliage looks. Based on what the sun does to the grass in this screen.
Static Jak
Member
Wonder how hard HBAO+ will hit performance. I'll pretty much sacrifice any other setting to keep it on.
The first shot you posted uses their SSAO implementation, not HBAO+ (it has the telltale artifacts).
The differnce between the first set and the second set seems to come down to ToD/weather affecting lighting and that the first two have a different and more varied set of prevalent grass/foliage textures.
Also, I can discern that the 4th shot features a bear.
The differnce between the first set and the second set seems to come down to ToD/weather affecting lighting and that the first two have a different and more varied set of prevalent grass/foliage textures.
Also, I can discern that the 4th shot features a bear.
Luckily, HBAO+ is generally not that expensive considering how good it looks compared to other AO tech.
BigTnaples
Todd Howard's Secret GAF Account
Thank you! Enlightening.
SuicidalGnome
Neo Member
Been sat here wondering whether to get it on my laptop or Xbox. My laptop is a lot more powerful
i7-4710MQ,
870m 6GB Vram,
16GB DDR3
but if it's not going to look much better than my Xbox due to optimisation then I'll just get it on Xbox so I don't ever need to troubleshoot.
I was hoping for 1080p at a decent fps on my laptop.
Any help would be appreciated!
i7-4710MQ,
870m 6GB Vram,
16GB DDR3
but if it's not going to look much better than my Xbox due to optimisation then I'll just get it on Xbox so I don't ever need to troubleshoot.
I was hoping for 1080p at a decent fps on my laptop.
Any help would be appreciated!
PC Games Hardware has said that VRAM usage tops out at ~2.5GB when using the Ultra preset at 1440p, so you have a bit of headroom.
BigTnaples
Todd Howard's Secret GAF Account
Thats pretty damned good for Ultra/1440p.
A 290X is just slightly under a GTX 970 correct? Sometimes equal.
By this it looks like if dropped down to 1080p, people with 970's will be able to manage 60fps on Ultra, even without an OC. Hairworks effects on framerate to be determined, but an OC could make up for the difference.
Either way my SLI 970 FTW's are overclocked, and ready to hit that magic 30fps number at 4k.
Similar threads
- Locked