More outrage at depiction of rape in Game of Thrones television show (spoilers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Which is my point. You can't throw out "it's congruent with the time period" like it's some kind of explanation that we should just accept for something we don't like.

Well, that's a pretty terrible point.

You're arguing about the scene in relation to the plot, which has yet to unfold. How can you complain about something that hasn't concluded yet?
 
Which is my point. You can't throw out "it's congruent with the time period" like it's some kind of explanation that we should just accept for something we don't like.

But Ramsey raping Sansa IS something he would do and was completely expected by all parties involved.

Ramsey flaying Sansa makes no sense and would only serve to rally the North against him, his father would probably kill him himself if he did that to Sansa.
 
Which is my point. You can't throw out "it's congruent with the time period" like it's some kind of explanation that we should just accept for something we don't like.

barely anything that happens in Westeros is acceptable. I think she probably suffered emotionally way more when Joffrey made her look at her father's head in a spike for torture sake, but that's only a guess.
 
I feel like a lot of this has to do with the fact that a lot of people love Sansa (and the Starks) and also because she's a virgin. If it were a character that isn't beloved getting raped I don't think the level of outrage would be as high. But that's just guessing by me. Poor Sansa :(

I do think they're overusing the rape thing. Actually I don't even mind it happening because the rules of the world and what happens after weddings are already built, but it could have been implied or happened off screen rather than going full boar on the shock.

Or have her get out of it somehow. I don't know though. I'm against the over-use of rape but overall I'm kind of indifferent. This show is basically torture porn sometimes both physically and mentally.
 
We have a very different relationship to violence culturally than we do to sexual assault. There's a whole host of things, but probably the big one is that as a culture we're a lot better at dealing with victims of violence then we are at dealing with victims of sexual assault (well unless they're black)
I honestly don't think that we are better at dealing with victims of physical violence.
 
But Ramsey raping Sansa IS something he would do and was completely expected by all parties involved.

Ramsey flaying Sansa makes no sense and would only serve to rally the North against him, his father would probably kill him himself if he did that to Sansa.

I mean even if you argue she didn't know to what extent Ramsay was twisted when she accepted the engagement, the house has a skinless dude as their sigil for Christ's sake.
 
Which is my point. You can't throw out "it's congruent with the time period" like it's some kind of explanation that we should just accept for something we don't like.

Bruh you need to think this through more.
 
I was sure that Ramsay was going to take sansa on a nice walk, get to know her dreams and Aspirations And give her flowers. I was totally caught Off guard by this
 
I was sure that Ramsay was going to take sansa on a nice walk, get to know her dreams and Aspirations And give her flowers. I was totally caught Off guard by this

And that's really the point, isn't it?

It would have been strange if that scene went down any other way.
 
I was sure that Ramsay was going to take sansa on a nice walk, get to know her dreams and Aspirations And give her flowers. I was totally caught Off guard by this

Of course she was, there's some unwritten rule that after being treated like shit 3 times in a narrative you're suppose to overcome.

I don't understand how people magically thought she was going to get outta the situation. Anything they could of pulled wouldn't of been believable. Even if Theon killed Ramsay, then what?
 
Oh.

I see how this is going.

Very well. The show will continue, it will get massive ratings, and all will be well until the strange and confusing conclusion. For no matter how passionate, our internet arguments amount to very little. And life rolls on.

Thanks for helping me rediscover solid ground on this argument. Have fun.
 
I had no idea that Sansa or the other Starks were fan favorites, in my opinion they are the worst major characters in the show and are boring to watch. Anyway can't sign off on this outrage, shock value is what HBO and GoT are all about.
 
WTF? GoT is full of depraved shit, but that stuff happens every day IRL and has since humans have walked on the planet. If you can't handle that kind of subject matter then don't watch the show.
Ramsay raping Sansa sounds like something that that character would do
, so I'm not quite sure why people are surprised, and rape in general is something that probably happens constantly in Westeros, at least compared to our modern day reality/culture, so it definitely wasn't over the top for me.
 
Game of Thrones is pretty much "torture porn" at this point, so to deviate from that formula would probably lose the show viewership.

It needs the shock value.

Problem is, they're slowly running out of people to torture. Keeping Sansa as the "last pure virgin" in the show was a way to maintain some suspense and keep tension up surrounding her virtue. Look at the close calls she had with Joffrey. That was great tension.

Now, she's just another victim/survivor and it's one less idea to root for.

Arya and Jon Snow are the only two people left that aren't carrying around tons of collateral baggage.
 
Yeah, I don't understand the outrage. This show has been brutal from day one. Here's a quote from GRRM explaining sexual violence in his work from an interview last year:

But Martin told the New York Times that although his books are epic fantasy, they are based on history (the series is loosely inspired by the Wars of the Roses). And "rape and sexual violence have been a part of every war ever fought, from the ancient Sumerians to our present day".

"To omit them from a narrative centered on war and power would have been fundamentally false and dishonest, and would have undermined one of the themes of the books: that the true horrors of human history derive not from orcs and Dark Lords, but from ourselves. We are the monsters. (And the heroes too). Each of us has within himself the capacity for great good, and great evil," the author said.

History, according to Martin, is "written in blood", and although Westeros – the fictional continent where the series is set – is not "the Disneyland Middle Ages", it is "no darker nor more depraved than our own world". "The atrocities in A Song of Ice and Fire, sexual and otherwise, pale in comparison to what can be found in any good history book," he said.


http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/may/06/george-rr-martin-game-of-thrones-sexual-violence
 
For the record, I ultimately didn't think the scene was necessary---there were a lot of ways to get to where I think they're going without doing what they did. I also felt physically ill---it was awful to watch.

However, I have to think that a lot of people being upset has less to do with what happened than the person attached to it. I never saw the related storyline in the book, which is way way worse, garner this level of outrage, which suggests to me that it has less to do with the actual depiction or structural validity of the scene and more to do with their emotional attachment to the character.

In weird ways, despite the criticism, this show is far tamer in terms of sexual violence than the books are. This not excuse anything the show does, but people who criticize this book simultaneously on book purity and the shows gratuity confuse me. The books are way more gratuitous in many ways.
 
I didnt really mind it outside of being uncomfortable. This season has been complete shit though.

The scene was intended to be uncomfortable. It didn't glorify rape and the only people who would have actually liked that scene are degenerates. But given the circumstances Sansa was in, the only two (consistent) options were to show the scene as they did or to simply not show it and imply it happened. But this show has never sanitized the horrible shit that happens to anyone, so I don't really know why it would be expected they would either avoid it happening or not show you that it happened.

Rape, murder and abuse are unfortunately real things that happen to people in the world. The entire purpose of the show is to depict a medieval fantasy where the horrible shit that happens in real life has a serious impact on how events unfold. I just can't say it was gratuitous or didn't lead anywhere because I don't know what the long term plot is for this show or even the books.
 
I feel like a lot of this has to do with the fact that a lot of people love Sansa (and the Starks) and also because she's a virgin. If it were a character that isn't beloved getting raped I don't think the level of outrage would be as high. But that's just guessing by me. Poor Sansa :(

You don't have to guess, there's a handful of people just in this thread saying the rape scene in the books was less bad -- and actually, better writing! -- because it involved a side character who wasn't Sansa.
 
You don't have to guess, there's a handful of people just in this thread saying the rape scene in the books was less bad -- and actually, better writing! -- because it involved a side character who wasn't Sansa.

Ah, so rape is permissible as long as it's a character we don't like.

Well, at least it makes more sense now.
 
When a showrunner doesn't realize they made a rape scene, I don't trust them to deal with the after effects of one.

A similar but not exact scene happens in the books, but the scene ends just before the rape happens. By showing the rape, it becomes indulgent.
 
Sansa had 0 clue how bad of a person Ramsay was.

She sacrificed herself to marry Ramsay yes, that was her choice. She never would have done it if she knew what this Ramsay dude is capable of.

Let's see. It's the son of the man that betrayed and killed her mother and brother. She sees maimed Theon. Myranda tells her Ramsay killed his girlfriend because she bored him. Yeah, pretty high chance this guy is going to be a mean dude.

D & D wanted to have a rape to shock people but they weren't smart enough to have it make sense. (It makes sense that Ramsay would do it of course. It makes no sense that Sansa would put herself in that position)
 
Let's see. It's the son of the man that betrayed and killed her mother and brother. She sees maimed Theon. Myranda tells her Ramsay killed his girlfriend because she bored him. Yeah, pretty high chance this guy is going to be a mean dude.

D & D wanted to have a rape to shock people but they weren't smart enough to have it make sense. (It makes sense that Ramsay would do it of course. It makes no sense that Sansa would put herself in that position)

Shock who? Book readers know Ramsay rapes his new bride; TV watchers know that Ramsay is a sick fuck who will obviously rape Sansa because that's basically his whole shtick. Who's shocked at all by what happens there?
 
When a showrunner doesn't realize they made a rape scene, I don't trust them to deal with the after effects of one.

A similar but not exact scene happens in the books, but the scene ends just before the rape happens. By showing the rape, it becomes indulgent.

I disagree. I think it makes the consequences of something horrible less real if you just say something bad happened and don't depict it at all. They didn't show the rape, by the way, they just showed Theon's reaction to it happening.
 
Let's see. It's the son of the man that betrayed and killed her mother and brother. She sees maimed Theon. Myranda tells her Ramsay killed his girlfriend because she bored him. Yeah, pretty high chance this guy is going to be a mean dude.

D & D wanted to have a rape to shock people but they weren't smart enough to have it make sense. (It makes sense that Ramsay would do it of course. It makes no sense that Sansa would put herself in that position)

well littlefinger put her there, he persuaded her. and we don't know if he really cares about her well being, as far as we know he only wants her to be alive, and the boltons certainly won't kill her, she is far more worth to them alive.

and most of the things you mentioned were only revealed to her after she was already there. she can hardly call a cab back to the vale.
 
Let's see. It's the son of the man that betrayed and killed her mother and brother. She sees maimed Theon. Myranda tells her Ramsay killed his girlfriend because she bored him. Yeah, pretty high chance this guy is going to be a mean dude.

D & D wanted to have a rape to shock people but they weren't smart enough to have it make sense. (It makes sense that Ramsay would do it of course. It makes no sense that Sansa would put herself in that position)

I think she learned in King's Landing from Tyrion that just because you're the son of someone doesn't make you horrible. She had no idea what to expect of Ramsey when she agreed, once she got there and started seeing Ramsey for what he was it was too late to change her mind.
 
The show creator's defense of the scene is pretty bad too. They called it "a woman making a difficult decision." They came out to defend their last rape scene as well, claiming it was also not actually rape. This seems to be a recurring issue.

Within context the rape scene seems appropriate given what we know of Ramsay Bolton. Sansa also knows how brutal he is and chose the lesser of two evils (which goes to show how bad Ramsay actually is).
 
Shock who? Book readers know Ramsay rapes his new bride; TV watchers know that Ramsay is a sick fuck who will obviously rape Sansa because that's basically his whole shtick. Who's shocked at all by what happens there?

People who refuse to admit that Game of Thrones doesn't follow genre tropes. She tricked some idiot nobles last year at the Vale so she be able to out maneuver the Boltons after being in Winterfell a week.
 
I don't get it, after all. How did people who are dropping this show because of this scene get past the 13 year old Danny forced by her brother to be raped on the wedding night to a Dothraki leader brute?

That was season 1
 
The way it was depicted... whatever. D&D don't have the rep to make it come off as any more than a shock scene.

As a book reader the issue lies with the effect it has on the development of Sansa and Theon. It's just cheap writing to try to get them to a certain point in their story. And people say "well you don't know where it's headed!" Well I can guess with a 90% certainty of what these events lead to by the end of the season.
 
And people say "well you don't know where it's headed!" Well I can guess with a 90% certainty of what these events lead to by the end of the season.

ugh, we are saying that to not spoil the non book readers, of course we know where it's heading
 
The show is terrible for reasons other than this.

Let's just completely remove important character arcs, instead we get Jaime and Bronn's merry trip to Dorne.

What in the world...

As someone who has read all of the books multiple times but only seen the first season of the show... I think I need to resume watching now that HBO offers an service free from cable television.
 
Shock who? Book readers know Ramsay rapes his new bride; TV watchers know that Ramsay is a sick fuck who will obviously rape Sansa because that's basically his whole shtick. Who's shocked at all by what happens there?

It was shocking because it happened to Sansa not because there was a rape on GoT. There was murder in the show before the Red Wedding too. Doesn't mean RW wasn't shocking.
 
I'm pretty sure I saw a pregnant woman get stabbed in the stomach where her baby was killed and then she was murdered in front of her husband. That seemed a fair bit worse to me than what happened at the end of that episode.

Some pretty bad shit happens in game of thrones, it's not really for the faint of heart.
 
Surprising the readers of the book is just as important as surprising regular viewers of the show. Half of the reason people tune In to the show is to see what perverse unexpected shit is going to happen next.
 
The way it was depicted... whatever. D&D don't have the rep to make it come off as any more than a shock scene.

As a book reader the issue lies with the effect it has on the development of Sansa and Theon. It's just cheap writing to try to get them to a certain point in their story. And people say "well you don't know where it's headed!" Well I can guess with a 90% certainty of what these events lead to by the end of the season.

Oh, so you read the book and you know where it's going?

How could that be possible?
 
If we are offended by the portrayal of rape in a fictional medium why are we not offended by murder as well?

I am not posing that they are equivalent. They are however both horrible crimes that should not occur in real life.
 
well littlefinger put her there, he persuaded her. and we don't know if he really cares about her well being, as far as we know he only wants her to be alive, and the boltons certainly won't kill her, she is far more worth to them alive.

and most of the things you mentioned were only revealed to her after she was already there. she can hardly call a cab back to the vale.

She was offered a way out if she wanted out. To light a candle in the tower if she ever needed help.
 
I don't get it, after all. How did people who are dropping this show because of this scene get past the 13 year old Danny forced by her brother to be raped on the wedding night to a Dothraki leader brute?

That was season 1
To be fair, I don't think she's 13 in the show.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom