Ramsey wouldn't do that to Sansa as he needs her to secure the North.
Which is my point. You can't throw out "it's congruent with the time period" like it's some kind of explanation that we should just accept for something we don't like.
Ramsey wouldn't do that to Sansa as he needs her to secure the North.
Which is my point. You can't throw out "it's congruent with the time period" like it's some kind of explanation that we should just accept for something we don't like.
Which is my point. You can't throw out "it's congruent with the time period" like it's some kind of explanation that we should just accept for something we don't like.
Which is my point. You can't throw out "it's congruent with the time period" like it's some kind of explanation that we should just accept for something we don't like.
I honestly don't think that we are better at dealing with victims of physical violence.We have a very different relationship to violence culturally than we do to sexual assault. There's a whole host of things, but probably the big one is that as a culture we're a lot better at dealing with victims of violence then we are at dealing with victims of sexual assault (well unless they're black)
But Ramsey raping Sansa IS something he would do and was completely expected by all parties involved.
Ramsey flaying Sansa makes no sense and would only serve to rally the North against him, his father would probably kill him himself if he did that to Sansa.
Which is my point. You can't throw out "it's congruent with the time period" like it's some kind of explanation that we should just accept for something we don't like.
I was sure that Ramsay was going to take sansa on a nice walk, get to know her dreams and Aspirations And give her flowers. I was totally caught Off guard by this
I was sure that Ramsay was going to take sansa on a nice walk, get to know her dreams and Aspirations And give her flowers. I was totally caught Off guard by this
So I am kinda confused. Are people mad that rape was depicted in the show or just the way it was depicted.
But Martin told the New York Times that although his books are epic fantasy, they are based on history (the series is loosely inspired by the Wars of the Roses). And "rape and sexual violence have been a part of every war ever fought, from the ancient Sumerians to our present day".
"To omit them from a narrative centered on war and power would have been fundamentally false and dishonest, and would have undermined one of the themes of the books: that the true horrors of human history derive not from orcs and Dark Lords, but from ourselves. We are the monsters. (And the heroes too). Each of us has within himself the capacity for great good, and great evil," the author said.
History, according to Martin, is "written in blood", and although Westeros the fictional continent where the series is set is not "the Disneyland Middle Ages", it is "no darker nor more depraved than our own world". "The atrocities in A Song of Ice and Fire, sexual and otherwise, pale in comparison to what can be found in any good history book," he said.
Arya and Jon Snow are the only two people left that aren't carrying around tons of collateral baggage.
I didnt really mind it outside of being uncomfortable. This season has been complete shit though.
I didnt really mind it outside of being uncomfortable. This season has been complete shit though.
I feel like a lot of this has to do with the fact that a lot of people love Sansa (and the Starks) and also because she's a virgin. If it were a character that isn't beloved getting raped I don't think the level of outrage would be as high. But that's just guessing by me. Poor Sansa![]()
You don't have to guess, there's a handful of people just in this thread saying the rape scene in the books was less bad -- and actually, better writing! -- because it involved a side character who wasn't Sansa.
The male character standing in the room during the scene being discussed was nearly raped. Nice try I guess?
Yeah, I don't understand the outrage. This show has been brutal from day one. Here's a quote from GRRM explaining sexual violence in his work from an interview last year:
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/may/06/george-rr-martin-game-of-thrones-sexual-violence
Sansa had 0 clue how bad of a person Ramsay was.
She sacrificed herself to marry Ramsay yes, that was her choice. She never would have done it if she knew what this Ramsay dude is capable of.
Let's see. It's the son of the man that betrayed and killed her mother and brother. She sees maimed Theon. Myranda tells her Ramsay killed his girlfriend because she bored him. Yeah, pretty high chance this guy is going to be a mean dude.
D & D wanted to have a rape to shock people but they weren't smart enough to have it make sense. (It makes sense that Ramsay would do it of course. It makes no sense that Sansa would put herself in that position)
When a showrunner doesn't realize they made a rape scene, I don't trust them to deal with the after effects of one.
A similar but not exact scene happens in the books, but the scene ends just before the rape happens. By showing the rape, it becomes indulgent.
Let's see. It's the son of the man that betrayed and killed her mother and brother. She sees maimed Theon. Myranda tells her Ramsay killed his girlfriend because she bored him. Yeah, pretty high chance this guy is going to be a mean dude.
D & D wanted to have a rape to shock people but they weren't smart enough to have it make sense. (It makes sense that Ramsay would do it of course. It makes no sense that Sansa would put herself in that position)
Some people seem to think that because you include dragons you have to make the story take place in happy fantasy land.Yeah, I don't understand the outrage. This show has been brutal from day one. Here's a quote from GRRM explaining sexual violence in his work from an interview last year:
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/may/06/george-rr-martin-game-of-thrones-sexual-violence
Let's see. It's the son of the man that betrayed and killed her mother and brother. She sees maimed Theon. Myranda tells her Ramsay killed his girlfriend because she bored him. Yeah, pretty high chance this guy is going to be a mean dude.
D & D wanted to have a rape to shock people but they weren't smart enough to have it make sense. (It makes sense that Ramsay would do it of course. It makes no sense that Sansa would put herself in that position)
The show creator's defense of the scene is pretty bad too. They called it "a woman making a difficult decision." They came out to defend their last rape scene as well, claiming it was also not actually rape. This seems to be a recurring issue.
Shock who? Book readers know Ramsay rapes his new bride; TV watchers know that Ramsay is a sick fuck who will obviously rape Sansa because that's basically his whole shtick. Who's shocked at all by what happens there?
And people say "well you don't know where it's headed!" Well I can guess with a 90% certainty of what these events lead to by the end of the season.
The show is terrible for reasons other than this.
Let's just completely remove important character arcs, instead we get Jaime and Bronn's merry trip to Dorne.
Shock who? Book readers know Ramsay rapes his new bride; TV watchers know that Ramsay is a sick fuck who will obviously rape Sansa because that's basically his whole shtick. Who's shocked at all by what happens there?
The way it was depicted... whatever. D&D don't have the rep to make it come off as any more than a shock scene.
As a book reader the issue lies with the effect it has on the development of Sansa and Theon. It's just cheap writing to try to get them to a certain point in their story. And people say "well you don't know where it's headed!" Well I can guess with a 90% certainty of what these events lead to by the end of the season.
well littlefinger put her there, he persuaded her. and we don't know if he really cares about her well being, as far as we know he only wants her to be alive, and the boltons certainly won't kill her, she is far more worth to them alive.
and most of the things you mentioned were only revealed to her after she was already there. she can hardly call a cab back to the vale.
To be fair, I don't think she's 13 in the show.I don't get it, after all. How did people who are dropping this show because of this scene get past the 13 year old Danny forced by her brother to be raped on the wedding night to a Dothraki leader brute?
That was season 1