TGO
Hype Train conductor. Works harder than it steams.
Thats not really the same.Then how did we get Last of Us on the PS4? That's not an excuse anymore.
But all our PSone/PS2 Classics can be ported, especially the PSone Classics.
Thats not really the same.Then how did we get Last of Us on the PS4? That's not an excuse anymore.
Then how did we get Last of Us on the PS4? That's not an excuse anymore.
This isn't like the last gen. I have a ton of xbla and PSN titles that are orphaned without BC. Yes I do still play a lot of my arcade titles.
Without BC I will be a LOT more picky choosing which platform I buy digital titles for. Don't support my older purchases? Then they will be the last purchases I make there.... Very simple
Then how did we get Last of Us on the PS4? That's not an excuse anymore.
GOW collection (included 4 remasters), KH collection, MGS collection, ICO collection, TLOU, DMC, and ZOE. Probably spent near $100 for all those games by discounts and waiting. If i had to choose having PS2 BC all gen or the remasters. I'll pick the remasters. Of course everyone will say "why not both?" but remasters probably wouldn't have even happened if Sony kept BC around.
This! Sony wants you to pay for something which others offer for free. As hard as it sounds, it is how it is and i don't understand why gamers Support those practices.
Okay, so you just read the article completely wrong then? I guess that knee jerk must have hit your headThanks mate. You're great at arguing.
Then how did we get Last of Us on the PS4? That's not an excuse anymore.
Good lord if Xbox would of made a statement like this after Sony announced BC this place would of had a field day
Then how did we get Last of Us on the PS4? That's not an excuse anymore.
The comment is likely based on older consoles
PS3 is cell and PS4 is based on PC CPU. They can't even do it even if they wanted to, right?
Okay, so you just read the article completely wrong then? I guess that knee jerk must have hit your head
It might be helpful if someone would explain what it is and what it's setting out to do, instead of just saying what it is supposedly not there for.No matter how loud you say it people just don't seem to listen. For some reason a very large amount of people fail to understand what PS Now is and what it's setting out to do.
Nobody offers what PSNow does for free. PSNow is a streaming service. If I own a movie on DVD should I be entitled so stream it from Netflix for free?
Then how did we get Last of Us on the PS4? That's not an excuse anymore.
Backwards compatibility isn't used (according to Sony) because it was only on the early PS3 models. Most PS3 owners didn't use it because they didn't HAVE it (I mean PS2 games, btw). And they can't say anything about backwards compatibility on PS2.
Yes, if the show or movie was created by Netflix and you have a Netflix account.
I am not seeing why?Backwards is much more important this gen than any other gen though. Need them digital titles.
This. Plus no casuals are going to care about playing old games on a brand new console, especially when we're now a year & a half into the newer gen.
Sony tried that with PS3 being backwards compatible with PS2 games in the beginning of last gen, & looked at how well that worked out. People were more concerned about the price tag than that.
We are placing our bets on things like SharePlay, on things like Play as you Download, and things like Suspend/Resume.
I do not have an Amazon Prime Video account, but my purchases are available free to stream and download because they belong to me.Nobody offers what PSNow does for free. PSNow is a streaming service. It's a completely separate service. It doesn't cause your PS3 and PS3 games to stop working. If I own a movie on DVD should I be entitled so stream it from Netflix for free?
People are really over valuing backwards compatibility. Is it a nice feature? hell yeah! Having only 20 backwards compatible titles is retarded and shows how much they really care about this (not much). Hopefully they prove me wrong, i just dont see this as a feature that will make people go out and buy one. of course My opinion and all that jazz.
Then how did we get Last of Us on the PS4? That's not an excuse anymore.
I am not seeing why?
I am not seeing why?
Is this a serious question?
That game was ported over not emulated.
Thats not really the same.
But all our PSone/PS2 Classics can be ported, especially the PSone Classics.
They said trying to port that to the PS4 nearly killed them, it's not a simple task to move one game built on one pain in the assignment architecture to another one.
Are you dense?
By redeveloping it and charging $50 for it.
I do not have an Amazon Prime Video account, but my purchases are available free to stream and download because they belong to me.
Could Sony even go BC on PS4? PS3 used the cell so is it even possible?
We have experience of backwards compatibility. The earliest PS3 model was backwards compatible with PS2, and it is a much requested feature but actually its not so greatly used.
Hundreds if not thousands of dollars invested in digital titles which people can no longer play without keeping their old console hooked up is a pretty good reason.
AH ok I can see that.the x360/PS3 were the first consoles to have an extensive digital library and at the moment most of those games are locked to that specific hardware. it'd be nice to be able to bring digital purchases forward with you.
Yeah but ps4's is already.
How do you feel it is limited in terms of BC? The only things I know of are that it doesnt' support USB peripherals, Kinect or (currently) multi-disc games.Plus the backwards compatibility is limited on alot of things. Its not even true backwards compatibility. They hit a PR home run for sure with their wording.
Surprised at no mention of PS Now as at least a semi-comparison.
at the very least they should look at the pricing structure for PS Now.
It's because they want to push a paid service ie more money, which is fine but I won't pay for my game twice.
This! Sony wants you to pay for something which others offer for free. As hard as it sounds, it is how it is and i don't understand why gamers Support those practices.
My point is that with every generation comes a new set of hardware, different from its predecessors and yet BC was still a thing up until this gen. I know not all games were BC on the 360 and the PS3 but it still happened. I'm sure if Sony worked hard enough it's possible for them in some shape or form but if they don't think it's feasible, then that's a separate decision.