Mighty Chin
Banned
Can we just let this talk of MoS destruction go? Just let it go. It's been two years.
Honestly it's not even up there with my real issues with that movie.
I really hope they knock this one out of the park.
Can we just let this talk of MoS destruction go? Just let it go. It's been two years.
So why did thousands of people die? HahaNone of this is correct.
Are you sure you were paying attention when the movie was on?
But if you want to justify the "he's a force of good, even if people dislike him" angle, he has to save everyone, or at the very least he can't lose thousands. The screenwriters made him unable to save those people because that's more realistic, but in the process crippled all of their potential story lines because in the real world Superman would be a terrible thing, as he is in these movies. They really didn't think it through. You can't spend a whole movie talking about how Superman is the next Jesus and then also have him be an understandably controversial figure that operates "realistically" lolYour point of view is warped
General Zod and his machine did 99.9999% of the damage to Metropolis
It was not Superman pounding the earth into oblivion with a spaceship with peoples bodies being lifted and slammed into the ground
Superman put an end to the machine and saved the entirety of the planet, and then put an end to Zod in order to stop the killing.
He did not let anyone die. This is a completely warped reading of the Man of Steel.
So why did thousands of people die? Haha
So why didn't Superman save them? He's a messiah!Because Zod and his people killed them.
Four characters is too many
Guardians of The Galaxy establishes more than that in one movie and nobody gave it shit
Okay
I like to think that the hell hole that is Gotham isn't in New York, bad enough Marvel Heroes are fucking up the city all the time
So why did thousands of people die? Haha
So why didn't Superman save them? He's a messiah!
I've just come from the future where I've just seen the entire movie, and will PM you the answer if you ask nicely.I get that Superman broke Batman's building and that's why Batman wants to fight, but why is Batman in the desert in post-apocalyptic gear wearing a trench coat over his Batsuit fighting para-military forces with Superman's symbol as their insignia? It doesn't make any sense.
If only there was another studio that made superhero movies every year that fit this criteria.and I've really not been a fan of the "no jokes seriouspants" direction Goyer/Snyder seem to be taking DC movies in.
The classic Superman problem has never ever been that he can't save everyone. The classic Superman problem is that he has the potential to save everyone or do anything, so he has to always do the right thing.He didn't let them die. The majority of destruction to Metrolpolis was done while he was destroying the World Engine on the other side of the Earth, a process that only he could do. The classic Superman problem is that he can't save everyone. Happens in countless cartoons, comics and movies. He has to make a choice that would save the most people. It sets up his biggest fear. Once he reached Metropolis he resolved the problem as quickly as possible once he realized there was only one way to actually stop Zod.
There's always a way. Unless the writers don't make one because they want to write in destruction.Did you miss the part where he was fighting the giant terraforming machine in an environment that dampened his powers so that all life on Earth wouldn't cease to exist?
I'm saying its a terrible idea to make your fake fictional Superman a terrible hero that lets thousands of people die, because then you can't make a compelling Lex Luthor villain because everyone in the world should be of tne same mind as Lex Luthor. My original post was about how baffling it is that they went with this depressing tone for a Superman movie, and how ridiculous it is that Lex is supposed to be a villain in the world they've created.
It's in Jersey.
Why did you ask me to explain myself if you weren't interested in hearing the answer hahaThe depressing part is you throwing out plot progression in order to keep up you're.... "concern" going.
Good news...the movie will have two plus hours to show how perception can change.
The classic Superman problem has never ever been that he can't save everyone. The classic Superman problem is that he has the potential to save everyone or do anything, so he has to always do the right thing.
It's a ridiculous talking point that continuously gets parroted, despite there being overwhelming visual narrative proof in the film that it is false.
It's incredible, because it's at once a reinforcement that Kevin Costner's Pa Kent was 100% right (and surprise most people saying Superman is responsible for all the destruction are the same who think Pa Kent was compeltely wrong in his thinking and how he raised Clark) and hilarious because it's the kind of thing that Lex Luthor would want people to believe. Script flaws be damned, Man of Steel actually becomes retroactively even better due to some audience reaction actually reinforcing in movie character philosophies.
In the first Chris Reeve film Superman literally turned back time just so he could save everyone! He literally broke physics.Yes it is. It's be a recurring theme in Superman for a good 40 years. Even in the first Chris Reeve film his ultimate dilemma was being unable to save everyone. Happened with his father with the heart attack and toward the end with Lois when he had to stop that Earthquake machine. Happens in plenty of Superman comic and cartoon stories as well.
You can partly blame Marvel.It's a ridiculous talking point that continuously gets parroted, despite there being overwhelming visual narrative proof in the film that it is false.
In the first Chris Reeve film Superman literally turned back time just so he could save everyone!
In the first Chris Reeve film Superman literally turned back time just so he could save everyone!
There's always a way. Unless the writers don't make one because they want to write in destruction.
I'll definitely give it a watchThe sheer irony is amazing.
Dead, check ou this channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8XKsaYUSlv3rLBnhH5DOyA
He goes into extreme detail rebuking the myths of MoS with visual evidence
I can't believe that's what did it, but that was the climax of the film hahaBy posting this, you have officially made it to the ignore list. Congratulations.
No, that was the point of the whole thing. He always finds a way because he's Superman! "There's always a way" is basically his catchphrase, because he always finds a way to do the right thing and save everyone. It's not terribly realistic I suppose, but he's supposed to fill you with hope, not 9/11 comparisons. You're confusing Superman with someone like Spider-Man.But that wasn't the main conflict in it. It was literally that he couldn't save Everyone even with all his power. The turnback time thing was one of the weaker parts of the story and sort of negates how Superman has to make difficult choices despite that being a theme throughout the first and second Reeve film constantly.
Why did you ask me to explain myself if you weren't interested in hearing the answer haha
I can't believe that's what did it, but that was the climax of the film haha
I don't think anyone would have minded if Superman came up with a clever way like that to save Metropolis at the end of Man of Steel, but that wouldn't be "realistic" so they didn't do it.
No, that was the point of the whole thing. He always finds a way because he's Superman! "There's always a way" is basically his catchphrase, because he always finds a way to do the right thing and save everyone. You're confusing Superman with someone like Spider-Man.
No, that was the point of the whole thing. He always finds a way because he's Superman! "There's always a way" is basically his catchphrase, because he always finds a way to do the right thing and save everyone.
Oh it all makes sense in the more realistic context of the film, but I think it's a horrible decision to make a film like that in the first place. You could have still made a movie where he's just beginning and managed to save everyone anyway, and it wouldn't exactly have ruined the movie. You can even still add in choices about who to save for tension and still not have thousands of people die!U forget it superman begins
He just got the suit and the name the same week. He's totally inexperienced
Superman letting thousands of people die though has never been a thing. You can still have him make tough choices without him failing to be a super hero.Superman always finding a way to win hasn't been a consistent thing and since the 70s him having to make the tough choice of either involving personal happiness, humans lives or both has been a thing. Even at his most absurdly powerful winning required sacrifices like not being able to fix the lives of people in Kandor, having to sacrifice a potential relationship, etc.
Gadot is such a miscast as wonder woman, too skinny, poor acting, weird accent... I wish DC/Warner bros would think more about it but it's probably to late, we'll see.
Gadot is such a miscast as wonder woman, too skinny, poor acting, weird accent... I wish DC/Warner bros would think more about it but it's probably to late, we'll see.
Good lord at some of the posts on the past few pages. You hate the movie, we get it already.
I wish DC/Warner bros would think more about it
Question.
What's the deal with the contrast and black levels of this trailer, both the youtube and the higher quality quicktime version exhibit poor contrast/black levels. I first thought it was just my PC monitor as it's not that good with contrast/black levels, but I tried watching them on both my Kuro and Panasonic plasma and the the black levels were all grey, what's up with that?
Oh it all makes sense in the more realistic context of the film, but I think it's a horrible decision to make a film like that in the first place. You could have still made a movie where he's just beginning and managed to save everyone anyway, and it wouldn't exactly have ruined the movie. You can even still add in choices about who to save for tension and still not have thousands of people die!
Superman letting thousands of people die though has never been a thing. You can still have him make tough choices without him failing to be a super hero.
Guardians of the Galaxy established characters with the same weight of Batman, Wonder Woman, Lex, and continued fucking Superman? Yeah, why not, Starlord has the same lore, richness and cult status as Superman, no big issue here. Ok.
Yeah I watched it on a nice setup earlier and noticed that. Might just be a shit encode.Question.
What's the deal with the contrast and black levels of this trailer, both the youtube and the higher quality quicktime version exhibit poor contrast/black levels. I first thought it was just my PC monitor as it's not that good with contrast/black levels, but I tried watching them on both my Kuro and Panasonic plasma and the the black levels were all grey, what's up with that?
It's Uncharted 4 vids all over again. Someone forgot to encode it properly methinks.
Guardians of the Galaxy established characters with the same weight of Batman, Wonder Woman, Lex, and continued fucking Superman? Yeah, why not, Starlord has the same lore, richness and cult status as Superman, no big issue here. Ok.
Guardians of the Galaxy established characters with the same weight of Batman, Wonder Woman, Lex, and continued fucking Superman? Yeah, why not, Starlord has the same lore, richness and cult status as Superman, no big issue here. Ok.