Huh?
Whoops, meant eccentric :3
Huh?
The 'older Batman' thing is the one part of this movie that I'm a bit dubious about.
It feels a bit like them wanting to have their cake and eat it too, setting up a cinematic universe whilst also getting to use aspects of DKR. Old Batman coming out of retirement seems a weird thing to start a franchise with, when they're going to want to get a decade+ worth of films out of this stuff.
Fucking awesome.
The attention to detail was impressive, but why is Bruce so concerned with that one building?
Why is he running towards it?
The attention to detail was impressive, but why is Bruce so concerned with that one building?
Why is he running towards it?
The attention to detail was impressive, but why is Bruce so concerned with that one building?
Why is he running towards it?
Wayne tower man.
Let's not forget his satellite too.
And the range on that heat ray is insane. Like damn.
In Metropolis?
Wayne Tower is supposed to be in Gotham.
Wayne Tower Metropolis.The attention to detail is impressive, but why is Bruce so concerned with that one building?
Why is he running towards it?
In Metropolis?
Wayne Tower is supposed to be in Gotham.
In Metropolis?
Wayne Tower is supposed to be in Gotham.
And the range on that heat ray is insane. Like damn.
I like his portrayal in the animated series (JL and Superman).
He was shrewd and charismatic.
Eisenberg's portrayal comes off as eccentric.
Even Smallville Luthor was more appealing.
The attention to detail is impressive, but why is Bruce so concerned with that one building?
Why is he running towards it?
Probably baked a couple of people looking on from the adjacent building.
Notice how Zod blasts are more orange and Supes are more red.
![]()
The second one is the grapple dodge Batman does.
If you've ever played the Arkham games, then pretty much every corporate building somehow ties to a supervillain.
It's the building closest to him geographically. He sees this happening right in front of him. What other building is collapsing in front of him?
Hehehe.
I do love that we get to see the view from the other side. I would never have guessed the range on the heat ray was that insane. I thought the scene in the train station was pushing the limits of how far it could reach....I was so wrong.
Whoa, that's a damn good catch.
Also interesting is that the energy bubble WW creates from the deflected shot is also orange.
Hmm.
I think someone on the panel referenced Oakland/SF directly. IIRCI like that the two cities are across the bay from each other. That's pretty awesome. I've always seen them as Rust Belt/Great Lakes cities, so that confirms it for me.
I don't think I have heard anyone say that.Man of Steel is too serious
Man of Steel isn't serious enough
Man of Steel isn't enough like the Marvel movies
DC needs to stop following Marvel's formula
Man of Steel doesn't address the destruction caused by the battle
BvS doesn't count
I can't comprehend subtlety and cannot understand that Superman is young and was trying to save lives, take the fight away without it being beat over my head.
I also cannot fathom that time has passed from the last battle scene to the last Daily Planet scene.
I've never read a Superman comic
I didn't want to like that movie
I don't want to like this movie
Also when he is holding the girl he is next to a Wayne Enterprises sign
Doomsday....
Yeah,this isn't the first time I've seen this mentioned.Apparently it's Zod after some genetic work or some such and not the Doomsday we know from comics/animated movies.
I don't think I have heard anyone say that.
Yeah welli doubt we'll get a doomsday from the phantom zone sorta thing but it'd be fine for a throwaway villain that's still super powerful used in one film etc
Well I have definitely heard people say that the Luthor lines were too goofy/cheesy for this movie.Change it to "the ending wasn't serious enough"
Yeah, I won't mind it so long as it's explained properly and doesn't come across as poorly developed or unearned.
You mean you guys didn't like the 2 minute "Doomday" fight in Smallville?Yeah welli doubt we'll get a doomsday from the phantom zone sorta thing but it'd be fine for a throwaway villain that's still super powerful used in one film etc
I wonder if DC will follow suit with post credit teasers and what we'll get with BvS. SS is the obvious choice.
Spoiler alert
Bale comes in and unmasks the imposter Batman aka Ben and everything is alright again.
Then in the end you wonder why the movie was actually good and the credits reveal it Nolan. It was Nolan all along damnit.
Decent movie with poor writing and odd scene choices but incredible action sequences.
But yeah, people overblow the last act because they're offended that there's civilian casualties in a battle of gods in a densely populated city.
This is another her lazy misconception and generalisation. People are not complaining about the destruction (that's to be expected). Instead what they don't like is the fact how this Superman does not appear to give a damn about the civilians inside. We don't expect him to save every one or even escape from Zod to go find people, but at least he could appear to at least have some concern. Show how he wants to help people but can't as hard as he tries. This supermans first thought is to go kiss Lois Lane amongst the rubble instead of enquiring or trying to look for survivor's.
That's what I hear. But perhaps it could work as a flashback or something. It would be cool if it were a teaser for the actual Justice League movie.SS takes place before BvS tho, doesn't it?
I think someone on the panel referenced Oakland/SF directly. IIRC
You mean you guys didn't like the 2 minute "Doomday" fight in Smallville?![]()
Man that "fight" was so disappointing. I remember how pissed off everyone was when that aired.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Yqhp14hyyQ
I think that's where people throw the counter argument of him being "new" to the whole Superman business. It's why people are saying they don't see Superman in this trailer too because he doesn't act like him at all. In the first movie we got him blowing up the cities buildings and now the people don't even want him so there probably won't be that many scenes showing some of that classic Superman attributes. It looks like there will be some scenes though since in the trailer it looks like he saved a girl from a burning building?This is another her lazy misconception and generalisation. People are not complaining about the destruction (that's to be expected). Instead what they don't like is the fact how this Superman does not appear to give a damn about the civilians inside. We don't expect him to save every one or even escape from Zod to go find people, but at least he could appear to at least have some concern. Show how he wants to help people but can't as hard as he tries. This supermans first thought is to go kiss Lois Lane amongst the rubble instead of enquiring or trying to look for survivor's.
That's what I hear. But perhaps it could work as a flashback or something. It would be cool if it were a teaser for the actual Justice League movie.
They took inspiration straight out of Fox's "How to Handle Popular Super Villians" handbook.Oh God, I had successfully suppressed the memory.
Damn you for reminding me.
Fuck, I hated how they handled Doomsday in Smallville. I hated how they handled pretty much every villain apart from Zod.
Darksied as a fucking cloud? A FUCKING CLOUD.
They took inspiration straight out of Fox's "How to Handle Popular Super Villians" handbook.
![]()
![]()
I wonder if DC will follow suit with post credit teasers and what we'll get with BvS. SS is the obvious choice.