I'm confused. Aren't you a Steelers fan?
I guess a fan of cheeters is going to defend another team like the Pats.

I'm confused. Aren't you a Steelers fan?
I guess a fan of cheeters is going to defend another team like the Pats.
Never been therethis is what Jacksonville looks like:
![]()
You are such a cynical bastard.sure, and they said artificial sweeteners were safe, WMDs were in Iraq, and Anna Nicole married for love!
I think all Patriot haters should be imprisoned.
How many fans spirits have the Bills murdered?none of us need the full Patriot experience by coexisting with a murderer.
How many fans spirits have the Bills murdered?
Then how come the league didn't make a big deal about what the Vikings/Panthers did? Or have real guidelines in place for measuring balls? This wasn't a big deal for them until they think the Patriots did it.
There's no evidence the league thought ball manipulation threatened the integrity of the game until after the AFC title game.
Go back to the NFL thread. There was actually some news and conversation here.
So wait - why did the judge recuse himself in the union case?
How many fans spirits have the Bills murdered?
where did you hear this?
...what Brady or the Pats did.
Albert Breer twitter, unless I misread it.
According to what's on the docket, the case was assigned to Judge Richard H. Kyle. Judge Kyle has been involved with the NFL before. He was assigned the antitrust case filed by the union in 2011 but recused himself.
I love how ridiculously bad the Wells report is is ignored and it's simply a fact now that there was wrongdoing. It's becoming more and more clear, if that was even necessary, that most couldn't possibly care less about the actual evidence. The conclusions were not reasoned into and reasoning you and others out of them isn't easy or perhaps even possible.
The judge that is assigned the case was the same judge that was assigned the in Brady v NFL in 2011 (2011 lockout) but he recused himself of that case.
yes!
Innocent people don't destroy evidence.
Innocent people don't refuse outright to cooperate with an investigation
Fuck the Wells report. Brady's actions alone tell me that he's guilty. Anybody who could seriously defend them is..well, a Pats fan, apparently.
I love how ridiculously bad the Wells report is is ignored and it's simply a fact now that there was wrongdoing. It's becoming more and more clear, if that was even necessary, that most couldn't possibly care less about the actual evidence. The conclusions were not reasoned into and reasoning you and others out of them isn't easy or perhaps even possible.
First Bill Cosby then Hulk Hogan and now bionic. I have no more heroes.
So when are the Pats hiring back McNally and Jastremski?
uhhh bionic is being 100% serious, what the hell are you talking about?bionic is trolling the shit, doe, and they fell for it.
bionic is trolling the shit, doe, and they fell for it.
The NFL would need to give the Pats approval to do so.
Did I forget to mention ignorance? It's clear you haven't been following any of this closely and have no idea what's actually happening. The investigation got all of the information it needed, including every number Brady texted and all of the emails they requested. They never actually asked to physically take his phone. They were given access to every phone of every non player associated with the Patriots. Every single message, besides three on Feb 7th, can be corroborated between the text messages they already have from other phones and numbers texted on Brady's phone. When asked why the NFL didn't follow up on any texts sent to specific numbers they claim they were interested in, they responded that it was too hard to track those down.
The CBA does not provide any basis for demanding a player hand over messages and, despite this, the investigation was given plenty.
Your understanding of the situation is entirely wrong.
No, no they wouldn't.
None of that has anything to do with what I posted.
Innocent people don't destroy evidence.
Innocent people don't refuse outright to cooperate with an investigation
Fuck the Wells report. Brady's actions alone tell me that he's guilty. Anybody who could seriously defend them is..well, a Pats fan, apparently.
What you posted was wrong and/or incomplete and I explained why.
No, you brought up bullshit that has nothing to do with it. The Patriots deflecting by giving up non players phones has nothing to do with Brady's cooperation or lack thereof.
Fuck the Wells report. Brady's actions alone tell me that he's guilty. Anybody who could seriously defend them is..well, a Pats fan, apparently.
Deflecting? What the hell are you talking about? The entire reason they wanted the messages was to look at what he said to the equipment guys, to determine if anything was going on and if he knew about it. They have all of the relevant messages because they had access to those non player phones.
You really don't understand what's happening.
So when are the Pats hiring back McNally and Jastremski?
Patriots owner Robert Kraft advised Commissioner Roger Goodell last week that Patriots employees John Jastremski and James McNally have been indefinitely suspended without pay by the club, effective on May 6th. Neither of these individuals may be reinstated without the prior approval of NFL Executive Vice President of Football Operations Troy Vincent.
Yes they would. The NFL said so explicitly in their statement in May.
No, you brought up bullshit that has nothing to do with it. The Patriots deflecting by giving up non players phones has nothing to do with Brady's cooperation or lack thereof.
Not that it matters, but I'm not a Patriots fan. I'd root against them against most teams (though this whole thing will make me root for them this year).
The Colts broke NFL rules by taking the Patriots ball and testing it themselves. A false story was written saying the Patriots balls were 2+ PSI under the limit. And that was it; game over. From there on out, it has been nothing but PR. Every single thing the NFL has done has been done from a PR perspective, not from a fact-finding perspective or an integrity of the game perspective. What matters is headlines, not reality.
The reality is that the NFL did not punish teams who were caught altering the pressure of their footballs, or even applying adhesives to them - until it was a PR issue with the Patriots. They did not have a decent system in place to test the balls, instead using random gauges with wildly different accuracy, and not bothering to record the measurements. They didn't care until it was a PR issue with the Patriots (a PR issue generated by Colts rule breaking and a false story).
The scientific evidence suggests that the balls were not deflated - the NFL ignored that for PR reasons. The employees involved were talking about officials overinflating balls above their own limits (understandable given their laughable testing process), but that doesn't fit the PR narrative. The NFL can't implicate themselves for their poor process, for their lack of punishment of other teams who we know cheated, and the Colts for cheating. No, the Patriots HAD to have deflated the balls.
Because the Competitive Integrity Policy has never been given to players, no player in NFL history has ever been disciplined---or even investigated-for violating this Policy, let alone for being generally aware of someone else's violation of this Policy. Rather, only Clubs and Club personnel have been subject to discipline thereunder. For example, in 2009, the NFL suspended a member of the New York Jets equipment staff after he "attempted to use unapproved equipment to prep the K[icking] Balls prior to" a Jets game against the New England Patriots. NFLPA Ex.209 at l. According to the NFL in imposing the discipline, the equipment personnel's "attempt to use unapproved materials to prep the K[icking] Balls could [have] easily be[en] interpreted as an attempt to gain a competitive advantage." 1d. However, the Jets' kicker-the player who could have benefitted from the alleged attempt to gain a competitive advantage" (id.)-was not investigated, let alone disciplined. tlr'g Tr. 25A:7-12 (Vincent). This was perfectly consistent with the Competitive Integrity Policy's application to Clubs, not players, as well as the fact that even if the Jets kicker was "generally aware" of the infraction, general awareness is not a basis for discipline.
Deflecting? What the hell are you talking about? The entire reason they wanted the messages was to look at what he said to the equipment guys, to determine if anything was going on and if he knew about it. They have all of the relevant messages because they had access to those non player phones.
You really don't understand what's happening.
Not that it matters, but I'm not a Patriots fan. I'd root against them against most teams (though this whole thing will make me root for them this year).
The Colts broke NFL rules by taking the Patriots ball and testing it themselves. A false story was written saying the Patriots balls were 2+ PSI under the limit. And that was it; game over. From there on out, it has been nothing but PR. Every single thing the NFL has done has been done from a PR perspective, not from a fact-finding perspective or an integrity of the game perspective. What matters is headlines, not reality.
The reality is that the NFL did not punish teams who were caught altering the pressure of their footballs, or even applying adhesives to them - until it was a PR issue with the Patriots. They did not have a decent system in place to test the balls, instead using random gauges with wildly different accuracy, and not bothering to record the measurements. They didn't care until it was a PR issue with the Patriots (a PR issue generated by Colts rule breaking and a false story).
The scientific evidence suggests that the balls were not deflated - the NFL ignored that for PR reasons. The employees involved were talking about officials overinflating balls above their own limits (understandable given their laughable testing process), but that doesn't fit the PR narrative. The NFL can't implicate themselves for their poor process, for their lack of punishment of other teams who we know cheated, and the Colts for cheating. No, the Patriots HAD to have deflated the balls.
Troy Vincent of the NFL would need to approve it.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000492190/article/nfl-releases-statement-on-patriots-violations
If they are reinstated by the Patriots, Jastremski is prohibited from having any role in the preparation, supervision, or handling of footballs to be used in NFL games during the 2015 season. McNally is barred from serving as a locker room attendant for the game officials, or having any involvement with the preparation, supervision, or handling of footballs or any other equipment on game day.
Who determines what is relevant? You?
And:
Well, since there is zero proof of any wrong doing, they should be trying to get these guys reinstated. No? Poor schlubs.
I don't understand what you are arguing. The Patriots are not allowed to hire those two guys without the NFL approving it. You argued that was not the case.
The investigation identified the time periods. They have every message sent between Brady and the equipment personnel that they needed and the logs he provided show that.
I don't understand what you are arguing. The Patriots are not allowed to hire those two guys without the NFL approving it. You suggested that was not the case.
Yeah, OK, so they need Troy Vincent's approval. Shouldn't be hard as there's no hard evidence against them. Kraft and Brady are united in this thinking, they both should be trying to get them reinstated with the club.
What he's saying is that getting these chaps reinstated should just be a formality since everyone knows the Patriots did absolutely nothing wrong.
Why are the Patriots not lobbying for these two to be reinstated? seems that for an innocent party the Patriots are rolling over and taking a lot of punishment. Did they get their draft picks back yet?
I wouldn't know how easy or difficult it would be to get Troy Vincent's approval, though I imagine the NFL wouldn't grant it as the NFL's claim is that the two are responsible for deflating footballs.
Your argument makes a ton of assumptions that coincidentally favor your perspective.
Has the attempt even been made?
It's 4 games though. Brady still got his superbowl wins so it's really not a big deal imo.
I wouldn't know how easy or difficult it would be to get Troy Vincent's approval, though I imagine the NFL wouldn't grant it as the NFL's claim is that the two are responsible for deflating footballs.