Comfort Jones
Banned
i am not making any value judgments when i say that he is making, at its heart, an economical argument here. he puts forth the idea that government should reduce or eliminate its role in regulating something that is currently considered to be criminal so that the natural forces of the "market" will take over and effect a better and simpler solution.
it's a clearly libertarian argument. i don't see any way around that.
Under that view libertarians basically don't believe in laws because the natural force of the market would deal with everything, which is such a ludicrous and extreme view of it, and is basically the same as saying someone advocating that the government should completely control our lives or some other nonsense is a "democrat argument".