Kojima makes really fun games that are a blast to play, and he does a great job of evolving the mechanics and layering gameplay systems with each new title. But his writing and characterizations, at least when flying solo as he has been after MGS3, are inconsistent at best and often downright terrible much of the time.
1) You haven't played The Phantom Pain yet, so you're not capable or allowed to touch on its story telling.
2) Posting pictures doesn't grand your arguments more validity. Nice gimmick, though.
3) Your condescending and aggressive tone isn't necessary and is only making you look like you're overcompensating for your thin arguments.
For the record, thinking that contextually out of place lingerie/bikinis are pandering and stupid does not mean a person has "insecurity towards sexuality."
It's not contextually out of place, as I've explained multiple times. Is it pervy, because Kojima could've come up with something else? Sure. Probably. But it's not contextually out of place, not narrative wise, and not compared to the other entries in the franchise.
Are you aware of the conflict here?
I'm aware that you can't read, as there is no conflict. The "lighthearted" bits were referencing the older, more arcadey games, and the "war simulator" bit was referencing this new game, The Phantom Pain. In fact, that exact distinction was the exact point I was trying to make. But you were so busy tripping over yourself to get to your keyboard and reply in anger that you didn't even see what I was really saying. Thanks for proving my point, btw.
I think you could afford to look in a mirror.
I think you could afford debate classes and a way to reply thoughtfully instead of emotionally.
EDIT: This blows my mind. You know that as a fictional character with fictional superpowers, Kojima could have done anything he wanted with her, right?
Yes, and I never argued otherwise. Again: read my post. My point was that despite this artistic (and, sure, pervy?) decision, he created a context for that decision that validates it within the narrative of the game *and* the earlier conventions of the franchise. Does it change the sexualization? No. Does it make it easier to swallow? Definitely, unless you want to keep going on about how it should've been removed altogether (a.k.a. censorship) because being sexy is bad or condescending to people with vaginas, completely glossing over how powerful she is as a character and the fact that you don't even know what she'll end up wearing by the end and why. All of this which, again, has more to do with one's inability to deal with sex in media in general than the game itself.
She's in a bikini because he wanted her in a bikini,
Yes. And there's nothing wrong with that. I enjoy looking at a beautiful woman in a bikini. The problem is when it becomes the sole focus of advertisement or art, but that is not the case in TPP.
I really don't feel like repeating myself anymore; it's obvious you're not going to change your mind. You're obviously not looking for a proper discussion and the chance to maybe learn a thing or two; you're just here to shout at the pervy men who hate women because they enjoy their hyper depiction in media.
Whoops, actually, that's just an assumption, but one that is justified by your nasty posting style.
If he wanted her dressed in an actual combat uniform, he could have made her hair the sunlight/oxygen-absorbant part. I can't seriously believe you're trying to make this argument.
My argument is a very decent one and one with more facets than you're trying to play off, mister angry man. But I've shown you that now. I'm also glad you don't write stories for video games, because, honestly, through her hair!? At least the skin bit is believable, seeing as how there are animals who actually do that already.
Really GAFers, how do you put up with these people?
Oh, and one more thing: you can unlock outfits for Quiet later in the game. You can put your Bibles down.